Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Re: Liability & responsibility of electrician?

  • Thread starter William Sommerwerck
  • Start date
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:18:40 -0400, Jamie


The putrescence that is the KeithStain stains the group(s) with each
post he makes.


AlwaysWrong, and Jamie make such a cute couple, don't you think? Both
look up to septic scum.
 
P

PeterD

Jan 1, 1970
0
BTW just measured our North American domestic single phase here!
Leg A = 119 volts, Leg B = 121 volts. Leg A to b = 232 volts.
119/115 = 3.4% high
121/115 = 5.2% high
232/230 = 0.8% high
It's about 02.00h in mid summer so system load is probably light and
utility will have adjusted. No AC loads here; not needed.

Except for the fact that the NA standard is 120/240 volts (there are a
number of authorative references, feel free to Google them). So your
two 'phases' are almost dead on (probably measurement error) and the
240 is slightly low (measurement error, seems odd that it can be off
consdiering that it is supposed to be the sum of the two 120 legs.)

The reason that it was standardized at 120 volts was because of the
massive interconnecting done in North America in the past 25 years.
Old standards included the 115 volts you mention, and 117 volts in
some areas, and even some with 110 volts. It was determined that it
would be necessary to standardize all voltages (just not the low
voltages we are discussing here) to allow interconnection, and direct
substitution of equipment.
 
H

Harold and Susan Vordos

Jan 1, 1970
0
RoyJ said:
And since there is likely no load in shop when the install was taking
place, the 245 would be a higher than normal reading.

But I question the use of "3phase" and "245 volts" in the OP question.
Around here, 245 volts would be perfectly normal for a single phase
circuit, very high for a "standard" 208/3 phase delta.

208 three phase isn't delta. It's wye.

Harold
 
C

Capt. Cave Man

Jan 1, 1970
0
208 three phase isn't delta. It's wye.

Harold

Are you sure? Perhaps it is just that way where you live.

Southern California distributes 208 ungrounded delta configuration in
the industrial park I was in at my last job.
 
C

Capt. Cave Man

Jan 1, 1970
0
Sure they did. Where did you get your 120 volts from?

Our building used one of the phases to feed a step down transformer
that supplied 240 center tapped secondaries to us for standard services.
Any power supply we made that was more than 1kW meant that we could not
use our standard feeds to test it, so we had to get one leg of a three
phase feed fed into our lab, which we found to be not respective to
ground.

So our "120" came from whatever manner the power company used to supply
the entire area. Step down transformers with the center tap of the
secondary grounded at the pole, and at the service entrance and panel. No
big mystery.
 
A

AwlSome Auger

Jan 1, 1970
0
Not much standardization at voltage over 600V, at all.

13.8, 12.47, 12.00 KV are all fairly common MV distribution voltages
around here.
jk


Set your goddamned PC clock right, you absolute retard.
 
J

jk

Jan 1, 1970
0
PeterD said:
It was determined that it
would be necessary to standardize all voltages (just not the low
voltages we are discussing here) to allow interconnection, and direct
substitution of equipment.

Not much standardization at voltage over 600V, at all.

13.8, 12.47, 12.00 KV are all fairly common MV distribution voltages
around here.
jk
 
S

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt

Jan 1, 1970
0
Id be happy to do just that. Or he can meet me in Orange County.

Gunner

And these pussified retards claim to be civil members of our community.

Your heart will come calling again, aschhole. When it does, I'll still
be here. God put me here to watch the passing of the world.
 
R

Richard Cranium

Jan 1, 1970
0
And these pussified retards claim to be civil members of our community.

Your heart will come calling again, aschhole. When it does, I'll still
be here. God put me here to watch the passing of the world.


Highly doubtful. The odds are much more favorable that one day you
WILL piss off the wrong person. Indeed, we haven't heard from the
military guy whose girlfriend you were so vulgar with. And he was
locally SD based, right? We'll know he's reached you when we see you
posting apologies. You are such a prick!
 
H

Herbert John \Jackie\ Gleason

Jan 1, 1970
0
He is a troll. Here are some of his sock puppets:

No. jk is a fucking RETARD.

Trust me, I am not the only one that gets annoyed when a retard posts
into Usenet, and doesn't care about ANY of the fucking conventions.

Both of you are stupid sombitches.
 
D

Doug Miller

Jan 1, 1970
0
It is Usenet, you stupid twit, and Usenet has "posting conventions",
not gang boy mentality rampant anarchy, dumbfuck.
You seem unaware that one of those conventions is to *not* use multiple
sockpuppets. To anyone who knows how to read headers on a post, it's quite
obvious what you're doing.
 
D

Doug Miller

Jan 1, 1970
0
Then it should also be obvious that I am not attempting to hide
anything, dumbshit.

No, what's obvious is that you're a liar too. You *are* hiding your real name,
and you *are* hiding your real email address, and you *are* lying about it.
Which makes it obvious that the convention as you
claim is meaningless.

Any convention you don't want to abide by is meaningless.
I use the nym which fits the response, from MY
POV. It has nothing to do with whatever your wee wittle bwain has
concocted. There is no hiding, and it is 'quite obvious' that you have
no clue why I do it.

Liar. You're hiding your real name.
They are 'nyms'. A 'sock puppett' as you call it IS where the person is
attempting to hide his ID.

As you are doing.
I do no such thing,

Liar.
 
D

Doug Miller

Jan 1, 1970
0
Then the various Licensed Electricians who installed machines etc over
the years at the factory I finished tearing down yesterday were all
doing it illegally. 75,000 sq ft and no grounds in any of the
boxes/runs.

You're a little late to the party, Gunner. I've already demonstrated that
Jamie doesn't have any idea what he's talking about when it comes to wiring
practices or the electrical code.
 
S

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt

Jan 1, 1970
0
a pseudonym is by it's very nature an attempt to at least obscure
identity. Use of multiple ones is an attempt to further do so. If
you are not, then attach the same sig to all of them, with your real
ID, or at least a consistent sockpuppet one.


As was already stated, you fucking retard. My ID is in EVERY post, and
NO, I do not need to provide it in a sig for retarded pussies like you.
 
D

Doug Miller

Jan 1, 1970
0
Usenet is an anonymous forum, dumbshit.

Wrong yet again. Possibly you'll learn more about the internet when you start
junior high school this fall.
Do you actually think I would
want you and ANY of the other dipshits in here knowing my real name?

You certainly have good reason to be afraid people will find out your real
name. If Mommy learns what you've been doing with her computer, she'll take
away your internet access.
Usenet is NOT email, you retarded twit, and NOBODY here has ANY
obligation to include ANY email, much less a valid one. So **** off and
die with that dumb shit too.

In addition to being a vulgar, loudmouthed, obnoxious, prepubescent liar,
clearly you're ignorant too. Google "RFC 1036" to cure your ignorance.
No, I am posting a name which includes an impossible email that to
anyone with half a brain knows is not a real email, and they go on
knowing that it is an anonymous nym.

In other words, you're hiding your ID.
Which you said you don't do.
Which makes you ... a liar.
 
S

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt

Jan 1, 1970
0
Yeah right



jk

You ain't real bright, are ya boy?

Well, I know that going in, considering that you do not even know how to
set your fucking clock. So I KNOW that you have no clue as to any other
aspect of Usenet, much less what a header is or how to discern its
contents.

As it states... My ID is in EVERY post I make. It has NOTHING to do
with the nym used.

Wake the **** up and smell your own stupidity, boy.
 
L

life imitates life

Jan 1, 1970
0
He creates a new puppet about every other week, when people stop
replying to him.


You're a goddamned idiot. Were what you are saying true, I would
discontinue using the old ones, and that is not the case. I use every
nym I ever have, and it has nothing to do with your petty little old fart
pussy boy assessments.

Your flawed assessment matches your character flaws to a tee, Mikey.

I hope the infection in that jaw bone crawls up to your brain at a
little faster rate. I hope it gets you, right as you think you are about
to get it. Oh, and oh yeah... serious pain should accompany it.

That is the kind of response a twit like you has garnered, Mikey.
 
S

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt

Jan 1, 1970
0
Gunner said:
Doug Miller wrote:


Rich. wrote:




a foot. With THHN, I can safely install nine #12s in one 1/2" EMT, for 4
_completely independent_ 20A circuits (4 phase conductors, 4 grounded
conductors, and one grounding conductor).


Actually, by code you can have 6 phase conductors, 3 neutrals, and use
the EMT as your ground, giving you 6 circuits instead of just 4.

I would like to know where you have 6 phase service?


He didn't say that. The context makes it very clear that by "phase conductors"
he means what the NEC refers to as "ungrounded conductors", or, in the
vernacular, "hot wires".

I won't go into the use of EMT as a ground source.


EMT is explicitly permitted by the NEC as an equipment grounding conductor.
[2008 National Electrical Code, Article 250.118(4)]
Yes, on the solid run, but not after any couplings, connectors etc..
A Greed Wire is to be inserted in the pipe to insure a real grounding
system and each box is to be connected to this ground.

You can not use EMT or the like for a grounding source directly, it
has to have a ground wire in it and the attached equipment in the
circuit also connects to this same ground.

As for the article you popped up, I think you'll find it proteins to
the use of EMT as a grounding buss point, meaning, several grounds can
come off this point using ground clamps from a single run with no
couplings how ever, a main ground source must be bonded to this pipe.

If you truly believe otherwise, then you are practicing very dangerous
habits.

Haven't you ever heard of galvanetic issues with EMT hardware?

I work in a manufactory facility where we still have a lot of older
machines using the access boxes as the ground sources for attached
equipment with no internal ground wire feed from the main buss. I can
say in the time that I have been there, we have seen several fires from
lose EMT hardware connections causing arcs because the attached
equipment was having ground issues.

With dust,oil and paint that has been apply to these machines, it
makes a nice catalysis for a fire.
Most of the time if your lucky, the lose connects will weld them
self's long enough to force the protection to initiate.
Then the various Licensed Electricians who installed machines etc over
the years at the factory I finished tearing down yesterday were all
doing it illegally. 75,000 sq ft and no grounds in any of the
boxes/runs.

California btw..Anaheim.


Jamie is a ham radio operator who claims to be an engineer. He is
about as bright as the 50+ sock puppet dimbulb troll.

his real name and address are:

Maynard A Philbrook, Jr
520 Pleasant St.
Willimantic Ct. 06226

He claims his company continues to use chemicals banned by the EPA,
that he reused outlets at higher than rated voltages where he works. He
pretends he is intelligent, but rarely makes a post without a dozen
spelling and punctuation errors, along with words that make no sense. A
lot like your friend Bill Sloman who cross posts here sometimes. The
old SOB who whines about everything American, and that they discriminate
against him in Europe, because he's old.


Are you done, pussy?

Do you think it is very wise posting people's private contact info
without being solicited to do so is a wise move?

And you are retarded enough to think that someone is going to be showing
up at my door?
 
S

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt

Jan 1, 1970
0
Wrong yet again.

No, it is absolutely right. My post headers ID the source, and THAT is
ALL you or anyone else needs to know about me. I have no legal or moral
requisite to ID myself to you at a personal level.
 
S

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt

Jan 1, 1970
0
In other words, you're hiding your ID.
Which you said you don't do.
Which makes you ... a liar.

NO! You fucking idiot! As was stated already, My ID is in EVERY post I
make, and nothing you jack off at the mouth with about "lying" amounts to
a goddamned thing, you stupid twit.
 
Top