Did the comments relate to the matter at hand, or were they a personal
attack on me?
'nuf said.
No. They were an attack on the level of brainlessness with which you
spewed your CRAP, expecting folks to take your pathetic horseshit as
being fact, which it was nowhere close to being. THAT stupidity is what
got you called stupid. Facts are not ad hominem... except, perhaps to
the twits such remarks target.
You have ZERO knowledge of image reproduction technologies, so you have
no business spewing your pathetic opinion as to what level of achievement
man may or may not have reached.
Very similar to the stupidity level that Obama carries when he insults
our teachers and doctors and other scientists around the nation. You are
pathetic, and your level of knowledge in the area you were attempting to
foist your bullshit onto folks in.
So yes, you dippy bitch, the comments related directly to the matter at
hand, which was "Shut the **** up about technologies you know NOTHING
about." which applied directly to the horseshit remarks you made about
SATA and about the enhanced graphics port speed.
In other words, it is YOU that is not fast enough, yet has reached the
upper limit of capacity your wee wittle bwain can muster.
Clarification for you slow ass: You remarks were retarded. Whether
you are or not doesn't matter. You behavior or your words DO matter, and
THAT is what was (and still is) retarded in nature.