Suppose RAM came with some level of independent processing power.
You have no concept of how multiple pipelines work, obviously.
Many
operations could then be performed directly,
Many INSTRUCTIONS do currently get executed with each clock cycle now.
Your brainless 'idea' proves how little you know about what is going on.
So, if the mini-cpu included RAM stick pre-processed 'some operations',
it would STILL have to deliver the result to the MAIN processor in order
to be useful to the computer.
Your idea is devoid of reason.
with careful software
design resulting in minimal data being tramsferred between the CPU and
RAM and between blocks of RAM.
The data has to be processed. That's what processors do. Memory holds
data. That's what memory does. Any of your "additions" complicates an
already optimized system.
I'm not suggesting we'll see such a change,
I am suggesting that we will not. I am also suggesting that you have
ZERO grasp of what is taking place. I suggest that you begin with an XT
PC and DOS and learn about programming first hand, instead of spouting
off about it as if you know what is going on. You strike me as a person
that makes petty personal observations about a subject or technology,
then wander around expounding on it as if you actually have some grasp of
it.
Folks like you sadden me to a degree. Mainly since you know what you
are pulling, and still blatantly pull it.
but the assumption of
functional split between CPU and RAM is simplistic.
Quite so. To the point that any dope that suggests it only carries an
IQ of around 35, at best.
Yep... that'd be you. 35.