Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Never reinstall XP again

K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
The best we can hope for is that the next step is a big one. I think
that the next place that really needs a look is in the area of getting
rid of most of the memory to CPU and back transfers.

It is common already for CPUs to multiple cores and those cores to
have multiple ALUs but they all live on the same end of the same bus
structure. If some of the ALUs were moved elsewhere, trips over the
bus could be saved.

Please explain. The ALU is *part* (actually, many parts) of the
CPU. How are you going to move it "elsewhere" and where is
"elsewhere".
 
A

Archimedes' Lever

Jan 1, 1970
0
Wow! Tough guy! I'll wait to see if you can take care of Roy. I
doubt it.

He is gone. I did not expect you to notice, however.
Why? To see you soil your pants?

Ever see "Taken"? You'd look pretty funny with a couple of nine inch
spikes shoved into your knees and hooked up to the line voltage.

Any soiling I would do would be into your mouth in between 'hot wire'
sessions. You would not have a good day.
Where did you get your "degree", again? CJU?
What is the problem, KeithTard? You run out of stupid horseshit to
spew? Doubtful. I am sure you'll reply with more dirt stupid horseshit.
 
A

Archimedes' Lever

Jan 1, 1970
0
Sylvia, you have to remember that DimBulb isn't good at math. In
fact he's deathly afraid of it.


I was working with fractals and imaginary numbers before you even knew
what they were, dumbfuck... If you ever did, that is.
 
S

Sylvia Else

Jan 1, 1970
0
krw said:
Sylvia, you have to remember that DimBulb isn't good at math. In
fact he's deathly afraid of it.

Given his reply, it's certainly evident that he'd have failed statistics
101, if he ever took it.

Sylvia.
 
S

SkyPilot

Jan 1, 1970
0
At least I like pussy, you seem to like dicks... wonder why?

...Jim Thompson


That is funny. For one, I have never expressed any such desire. Two,
how would a twit like you know what "seems" a certain way unless you have
had first hand experience?

In other words, you pussified dumbfuck (that's a reference to you, not
what you like, idiot), You obviously know more about mens' private parts
than I do. I am only familiar with my own parts.

Jimmy, the senile, retarded Usenet twit loses... again.
 
S

SkyPilot

Jan 1, 1970
0
The best we can hope for is that the next step is a big one. I think
that the next place that really needs a look is in the area of getting
rid of most of the memory to CPU and back transfers.


You are about as computer science retarded as it gets, MooseDung.

ALL CPUs MUST transfer data between RAM and the processor, you stupid
twit.
 
S

SkyPilot

Jan 1, 1970
0
It is common already for CPUs to multiple cores and those cores to
have multiple ALUs but they all live on the same end of the same bus
structure. If some of the ALUs were moved elsewhere, trips over the
bus could be saved.
I doubt that you have enough brains to even know what is going on.

Check out the Cell BE structure if you want a modern process
architecture. It only happens to be at the helm of the world's most
powerful computer.
 
S

SkyPilot

Jan 1, 1970
0
Please explain. The ALU is *part* (actually, many parts) of the
CPU. How are you going to move it "elsewhere" and where is
"elsewhere".
He is an idiot. So are you for being a selective twit about who you
deride about being wrong.
 
S

Sylvia Else

Jan 1, 1970
0
SkyPilot said:
You are about as computer science retarded as it gets, MooseDung.

ALL CPUs MUST transfer data between RAM and the processor, you stupid
twit.

Suppose RAM came with some level of independent processing power. Many
operations could then be performed directly, with careful software
design resulting in minimal data being tramsferred between the CPU and
RAM and between blocks of RAM.

I'm not suggesting we'll see such a change, but the assumption of
functional split between CPU and RAM is simplistic.

Sylvia.
 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
He is gone. I did not expect you to notice, however.

Ever see "Taken"? You'd look pretty funny with a couple of nine inch
spikes shoved into your knees and hooked up to the line voltage.

You talk big for such a "short" boy. Got a little "Napoleon" thing
going on there, DimBulb?
Any soiling I would do would be into your mouth in between 'hot wire'
sessions. You would not have a good day.
What is the problem, KeithTard? You run out of stupid horseshit to
spew? Doubtful. I am sure you'll reply with more dirt stupid horseshit.

No spew. Answer the question Dimmie.
 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
I was working with fractals and imaginary numbers before you even knew
what they were, dumbfuck... If you ever did, that is.

AlwaysWrong lives up to his name again.
 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
Given his reply, it's certainly evident that he'd have failed statistics
101, if he ever took it.

Certainly true. AlwaysWrong, DimBulb, Archimedes' Liar, and more, all
fit. Stick around, you'll see exactly how scared he is of simple
arithmetic.
 
S

SkyPilot

Jan 1, 1970
0
Suppose RAM came with some level of independent processing power.

You have no concept of how multiple pipelines work, obviously.
Many
operations could then be performed directly,

Many INSTRUCTIONS do currently get executed with each clock cycle now.
Your brainless 'idea' proves how little you know about what is going on.

So, if the mini-cpu included RAM stick pre-processed 'some operations',
it would STILL have to deliver the result to the MAIN processor in order
to be useful to the computer.

Your idea is devoid of reason.
with careful software
design resulting in minimal data being tramsferred between the CPU and
RAM and between blocks of RAM.

The data has to be processed. That's what processors do. Memory holds
data. That's what memory does. Any of your "additions" complicates an
already optimized system.
I'm not suggesting we'll see such a change,

I am suggesting that we will not. I am also suggesting that you have
ZERO grasp of what is taking place. I suggest that you begin with an XT
PC and DOS and learn about programming first hand, instead of spouting
off about it as if you know what is going on. You strike me as a person
that makes petty personal observations about a subject or technology,
then wander around expounding on it as if you actually have some grasp of
it.

Folks like you sadden me to a degree. Mainly since you know what you
are pulling, and still blatantly pull it.
but the assumption of
functional split between CPU and RAM is simplistic.

Quite so. To the point that any dope that suggests it only carries an
IQ of around 35, at best.

Yep... that'd be you. 35.
 
A

Archimedes' Lever

Jan 1, 1970
0
You talk big for such a "short" boy.

You have no clue as to my stature, you retarded pussy.
Got a little "Napoleon" thing
going on there, DimBulb?


Yep... you're a 100% retarded 100% pussy.
No spew. Answer the question Dimmie.

Let's see... you jumped on the Johnny LarkTard bandwagon with the
"Always Wrong" horseshit, as well as the "scat" bullshit, as well as the
"no math" bullshit. Now... with the "didn't get a degree" bullshit.

As far as I can tell, you are too full of bullshit to get any answers
from me, other than declarations of how close you are to the brain power
that Roy has, which we all know hovers near nil. So **** you, boy.
 
S

Sylvia Else

Jan 1, 1970
0
SkyPilot said:
You have no concept of how multiple pipelines work, obviously.


Many INSTRUCTIONS do currently get executed with each clock cycle now.
Your brainless 'idea' proves how little you know about what is going on.

That has nothing to do with the issue.
So, if the mini-cpu included RAM stick pre-processed 'some operations',
it would STILL have to deliver the result to the MAIN processor in order
to be useful to the computer.

It's common in intensive computation problems that there are many
partial results. Suitable design can mean that those partial results are
not required elsewhere in a system, and such techniques would reduce the
required memory bus bandwidth.
Your idea is devoid of reason.


The data has to be processed. That's what processors do. Memory holds
data. That's what memory does. Any of your "additions" complicates an
already optimized system.

You seem to be arguing that it's currently functionally divided in a
particular way, and therefore that's how it should be done. In fact, the
distinction has already been somewhat muddied by the incorporation of
memory caches in the processors, as a different solution to the problem
of memory bandwith.

Sylvia.
 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
You have no clue as to my stature, you retarded pussy.

I wasn't referring to your stature, DimBulb.
Yep... you're a 100% retarded 100% pussy.

Yep. Li'l Napoleon.
Let's see... you jumped on the Johnny LarkTard bandwagon with the
"Always Wrong" horseshit, as well as the "scat" bullshit, as well as the
"no math" bullshit. Now... with the "didn't get a degree" bullshit.

I haven't used "Scat Man", but it certainly fits as perfectly as the
others. I was the one who said you didn't have a degree, then when
you said that you were degreed, asked where from.
As far as I can tell, you are too full of bullshit to get any answers
from me, other than declarations of how close you are to the brain power
that Roy has, which we all know hovers near nil. So **** you, boy.

IOW, you can't answer because you're Archimedes' Liar. I knew that.
 
Top