S
Scott Stephens
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Dirk said:And which Hank would that be, and do we have to kiss Karl's ass as well?
As Hank is apparently the metaphor for God, perhaps we should choose the
atheist one, on account of Occam's Razor. Why bother with crude
symbols or concepts to wrap the real thing?
The paradox, the irony about it, is those that don't believe in "Hank"
are likely to play sick little zero-sum games that wreck themselves and
the town they live in in their quest for their path of least-action. A
path of least-action oblivious to the same notion in the minds of their
neighbors.
Hank is more than a metaphor for a make-believe deity-parent, its a
metaphor for life and the characteristic organizing pattern it realizes.
As long as atheists keep demanding "theres no objective basis for
morality" they can plunder and loot their neighbors and children, hoping
theist-suckers will clean up the mess.
They fail to realize theists make up excuses to get their way as readily
as atheists. It is the pattern, a kleptocrasy, which is inculcated by
the delusion.
We don't ask for perfect, just for not total moronic fuckup.
I don't expect perfect, just not a crook that lies about saying he's
acting on your behalf while robbing you with taxes which subsidies the
thieving cronies which have bribed him, and subsidizing propaganda sewers.
--
Scott
**********************************
DIY Piezo-Gyro, PCB Drill Bot & More Soon!
http://home.comcast.net/~scottxs/
Those who sow excuses shall reap excuses
**********************************