Maker Pro
Maker Pro

a "killer" app..

R

Robert Baer

Jan 1, 1970
0
Note, in Business Week Sept 6 Pg99, of "..a ray to disable or fry
electronics in a car .. to stop it".
Initially 2 B used in LA.
 
B

Bill Bailley

Jan 1, 1970
0
Robert Baer said:
Note, in Business Week Sept 6 Pg99, of "..a ray to disable or fry
electronics in a car .. to stop it".
Initially 2 B used in LA.

I guess it won't be long before an antenna to help that process will be
built into the wiring harness of all cars. I'm all for it. Too many innocent
deaths in high speed chases.

Bill.
 
J

John Woodgate

Jan 1, 1970
0
(in said:
I guess it won't be long before an antenna to help that process will be
built into the wiring harness of all cars. I'm all for it. Too many
innocent deaths in high speed chases.

But such a facility could, and undoubtedly will if it is implemented, be
immediately used by terrorists, hi-jackers and rapists, to their own
advantage.
 
B

Bill Bailley

Jan 1, 1970
0
But such a facility could, and undoubtedly will if it is implemented, be
immediately used by terrorists, hi-jackers and rapists, to their own
advantage.

Oh dear! Stepped on it again.

You are right John. I didn't think it through far enough. What a complicated
world, populated with very real threats, we live in.

Can we squeeze some strong encryption into this to make it a little tougher
for today's Uglies? Seems a shame to fry a micro with raw power when a
little software finesse may do just as well.

Regards,

Bill.
 
J

John Woodgate

Jan 1, 1970
0
(in said:
Oh dear! Stepped on it again.

You are right John. I didn't think it through far enough. What a
complicated world, populated with very real threats, we live in.

Can we squeeze some strong encryption into this to make it a little
tougher for today's Uglies? Seems a shame to fry a micro with raw power
when a little software finesse may do just as well.

Even if the law officers use encrypted data to shut down the engine
management system without damage, once it has a port that accepts r.f.
signals the villains could use a high energy transmission to destroy the
system.
 
B

Bill Bailley

Jan 1, 1970
0
Even if the law officers use encrypted data to shut down the engine
management system without damage, once it has a port that accepts r.f.
signals the villains could use a high energy transmission to destroy the
system.

That's it !!!!
I'm damn well going bush. Got me swag. Got me tucker bag. Got 40lbs of
kangaroo jerky and three vitamin pills. I'll be right. I even have my Slim
Dusty record collection and my VCR tape of "Welcome to Woop Woop" Goodbye
cruel world.

Bill. ( The disenchanted)
 
J

John Woodgate

Jan 1, 1970
0
I'm damn well going bush. Got me swag. Got me tucker bag. Got 40lbs of
kangaroo jerky and three vitamin pills. I'll be right.

As long as you steer clear of billabongs and coolibah trees. I'd also
recommend some water to wash your jerky down with. Give my regards to
the Black Stump.
 
P

Pooh Bear

Jan 1, 1970
0
Bill said:
I guess it won't be long before an antenna to help that process will be
built into the wiring harness of all cars. I'm all for it. Too many innocent
deaths in high speed chases.

I've seen 'World's Stupidest Police Videos' too !

US police officers seem too keen to use their vehicles like weapons.

The ray gun idea is amusing though. Would have to have a very narrow beam to
avoid bringiing *all* the traffic to a halt.

Before the adoption of large scale radar in the UK prior to WW2 - certain
'inventors' were amusingly touting the spurious idea of a death ray to defend
Britain from Nazi bombers. Funny but true.


Graham
 
K

Ken Smith

Jan 1, 1970
0
Note, in Business Week Sept 6 Pg99, of "..a ray to disable or fry
electronics in a car .. to stop it".


According to the Califoria police, they already have a state of the art
device that will stop a car. You just have to point it at the engine and
pull the trigger. It sometimes requires two applications but so far never
three. They call this device a shot gun.
 
J

John Woodgate

Jan 1, 1970
0
I read in sci.electronics.design that Pooh Bear <rabbitsfriendsandrelati
Before the adoption of large scale radar in the UK prior to WW2 -
certain 'inventors' were amusingly touting the spurious idea of a death
ray to defend Britain from Nazi bombers. Funny but true.

Well, I don't think scoffing is in order. Tesla and Yagi, who both made
significant contributions to electrical science, would certainly not
have ruled it out. In fact, the British Defence Ministry (or whatever it
was called then) asked a panel of eminent physicists whether it was
feasible, and the answer was more like 'we don't know how, and we don't
think anyone else does' rather than 'it's impossible'. In fact, we know
now it isn't impossible and we know how to do it, but there are enough
problems with it to make it unattractive as a weapon (or so we are
told).
 
J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
Before the adoption of large scale radar in the UK prior to WW2 - certain
'inventors' were amusingly touting the spurious idea of a death ray to defend
Britain from Nazi bombers. Funny but true.


Watson-Watt began by seriously researching exactly that idea. His
folks ran the math and concluded that they couldn't kill a plane with
RF, but they could detect it. So the good guys won the Battle of
Britain.

John
 
J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
According to the Califoria police, they already have a state of the art
device that will stop a car. You just have to point it at the engine and
pull the trigger. It sometimes requires two applications but so far never
three. They call this device a shot gun.

Black powder has a much higher volumetric energy storage factor than
any capacitor dielectric.

John
 
M

Michael A. Covington

Jan 1, 1970
0
Bill Bailley said:
Oh dear! Stepped on it again.

You are right John. I didn't think it through far enough. What a
complicated world, populated with very real threats, we live in.

Can we squeeze some strong encryption into this to make it a little
tougher for today's Uglies? Seems a shame to fry a micro with raw power
when a little software finesse may do just as well.

Or just rig the car to emit a VERY LOUD NOISE when this is done to it...
maybe trigger a non-resettable horn relay, so the car will honk until the
battery runs down. That would provide at least a little protection.
 
I

Ian Stirling

Jan 1, 1970
0
Black powder has a much higher volumetric energy storage factor than
any capacitor dielectric.

Not vacuum.

The plates are an issue of course.
 
I

Ian Stirling

Jan 1, 1970
0
Black powder has a much higher volumetric energy storage factor than
any capacitor dielectric.

Not vacuum.

The plates are an issue of course.

And as to energy density/Kg, it can't be beat.
 
J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
Not vacuum.

The plates are an issue of course.

And as to energy density/Kg, it can't be beat.


Hmmm, what sort of volumetric energy density can be had in a vacuum
cap? At some point, the e-field bodily rips atoms out of the plates,
somewhere around 1e10 v/m I think. As a practical matter, anything
above a couple of megavolts is unusable, and power conversion
electronics works reasonably only into the 10s of KV.

So one cubic meter of vacuum cap is 9 pF, charged to 1e10 volts, gives
us 450 megajoules, not too bad. I wonder what's the force on the
plates? But a cubic meter of gasoline would store more energy and be
rather easier to work with.

Right, the energy/kg of a vacuum is pretty good.

John
 
I

Ian Stirling

Jan 1, 1970
0
John Larkin said:
Hmmm, what sort of volumetric energy density can be had in a vacuum
cap? At some point, the e-field bodily rips atoms out of the plates,
somewhere around 1e10 v/m I think. As a practical matter, anything
above a couple of megavolts is unusable, and power conversion
electronics works reasonably only into the 10s of KV.

That's why I said the plates are a problem.
I think you can store much more energy in vacuum, if they werent.

I think the ultimate limit comes when you've got so much energy in
there that you start to get assorted particles popping out of nowhere.
So one cubic meter of vacuum cap is 9 pF, charged to 1e10 volts, gives
us 450 megajoules, not too bad. I wonder what's the force on the
plates? But a cubic meter of gasoline would store more energy and be
rather easier to work with.

Very true.
 
D

Dimitrij Klingbeil

Jan 1, 1970
0
Ian Stirling said:
That's why I said the plates are a problem.
I think you can store much more energy in vacuum, if they werent.

Would not the tunnel effect still rip a lot of electrons from the plates
under these circumstances, no matter what the mechanical strength of them
is. Besides, the principle of uncertainity may just help to get electrons to
the wrong plate as well (provided the distance is small enough, which seems
likely for Xe10 V/m with only Xe3 V available).

If it wasn't for issues like these, that crazy EER guy would likely turn out
to be right with his 'advanced dielectric' approach after all :)
 
K

Ken Taylor

Jan 1, 1970
0
Bill Bailley said:
I guess it won't be long before an antenna to help that process will be
built into the wiring harness of all cars. I'm all for it. Too many innocent
deaths in high speed chases.

Bill.
While there's no arguing that one is 'too many', just how many deaths do you
think occur because of high-speed chases? It's a bizarre solution to an
almost non-existent problem, a back-door attempt at Big Brother-type
control.

Ken
 
C

Clifford Heath

Jan 1, 1970
0
Ken said:
While there's no arguing that one is 'too many', just how many deaths do you
think occur because of high-speed chases?

Monthly or so in this country, often innocents, despite assorted
policies of abandoning the pursuits.
 

Similar threads

R
Replies
2
Views
1K
Robert Baer
R
M
Replies
2
Views
977
M
G
Replies
7
Views
2K
D Yuniskis
D
Top