B
[email protected]
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
It depends on the nature of the disagreement. There are some responses
that deserve derision, and this is certainly one of them.
You are letting your imagination run away with you. You haven't got a
shred of evidence to support this libellous allegation. Try e-mailing
[email protected] - last week ASML (who make optical
lithography systems for semi-conductor manufacturers, which do have a
lot in common with the electron beam lithography systems that I worked
on at Cambridge Instruments) advertised a large number of electronic
engineering jobs, so I applied for the four or five that I thought I
could do. She knocked me back on all of them within a few days.
As far as keeping my unemployment benefit goes, this was a complete
waste of time, because I've got a to give a contact phone number for
each job that I claim to have applied for, and the ASML advertisement
didn't give any such number, nor did their web-site.
The chance that I'd get anything out of them was very low - I did get
an interview out of them back in 1994, for what turned out to be a job
where I didn't have much to offer (which hadn't been obvious from the
ad) but nothing since - but it's fairly clear that they are getting
pretty desperate at the moment, so it seemed worth giving them one
more try.
You'd lose.
You've got to be kidding. I enjoy doing serious electronics, and I
can't really do the kind of stuff I like doing at home - my wife and I
may be comfortable, but a decent oscilliscope is out of my range.
Answering questions around here is a poor substitute, but its what I
can get.
The boredom would probably kill me.
Your reality. Which does seem to be based on your rather limited
imagination.
Illusions don't last.
Now apply this brilliant insight to religion, which is pure delusion.
Religious leaders do warp many peoples' perceptions of reality without
having the capacity to manipulate anything that any objective observer
could describe as real, except in the trivial sense of creating real
delusions in real people's heads.
Nope, but I've got enough nieces and nephews (8) to pass.
You both make it blindingly obvious here from time to time.
I doubt it. What works for me probably wouldn't work for you, because
you don't seem to have the intellectual skills to construct a coherent
argument (see above) nor the background to make sense of the kind of
stuff I read. But don't lose heart - you could come a long way just by
reading a decent newspaper (the Christian Science Monitor is a lot
better than it's name suggests).
Yes, that _is_ one of your problems.
that deserve derision, and this is certainly one of them.
You are letting your imagination run away with you. You haven't got a
shred of evidence to support this libellous allegation. Try e-mailing
[email protected] - last week ASML (who make optical
lithography systems for semi-conductor manufacturers, which do have a
lot in common with the electron beam lithography systems that I worked
on at Cambridge Instruments) advertised a large number of electronic
engineering jobs, so I applied for the four or five that I thought I
could do. She knocked me back on all of them within a few days.
As far as keeping my unemployment benefit goes, this was a complete
waste of time, because I've got a to give a contact phone number for
each job that I claim to have applied for, and the ASML advertisement
didn't give any such number, nor did their web-site.
The chance that I'd get anything out of them was very low - I did get
an interview out of them back in 1994, for what turned out to be a job
where I didn't have much to offer (which hadn't been obvious from the
ad) but nothing since - but it's fairly clear that they are getting
pretty desperate at the moment, so it seemed worth giving them one
more try.
I'd even be willing to bet that you've botched interviews on purpose
so that you don't have to go back to work.
You'd lose.
After all, why should you? As you've admitted, with what you and
your wife both bring in you're comfortable, so there's no real
incentive for you to get back in the race.
You've got to be kidding. I enjoy doing serious electronics, and I
can't really do the kind of stuff I like doing at home - my wife and I
may be comfortable, but a decent oscilliscope is out of my range.
Answering questions around here is a poor substitute, but its what I
can get.
The boredom would probably kill me.
Your reality. Which does seem to be based on your rather limited
imagination.
Illusions don't last.
But, I think you're trying to change the subject since that's not
what we were talking about, which was that if someone in touch with
reality wants to successfully warp someone else's perception of
reality then he must, at least, be capable of manipulating reality.
That, of course, implies a knowledge of reality adequate to allow
its perception to be warped.
---
Now apply this brilliant insight to religion, which is pure delusion.
Religious leaders do warp many peoples' perceptions of reality without
having the capacity to manipulate anything that any objective observer
could describe as real, except in the trivial sense of creating real
delusions in real people's heads.
Nope, but I've got enough nieces and nephews (8) to pass.
You both make it blindingly obvious here from time to time.
---
Ah, I see...
If only I'd accept your view of reality and "mend my ways" in order
to trudge down "Sloman's way" in lock-step with you that'd solve all
the problems you perceive I have?
I doubt it. What works for me probably wouldn't work for you, because
you don't seem to have the intellectual skills to construct a coherent
argument (see above) nor the background to make sense of the kind of
stuff I read. But don't lose heart - you could come a long way just by
reading a decent newspaper (the Christian Science Monitor is a lot
better than it's name suggests).
Sounds to me like it's _you_ who's got the problem, buddy-boy!
Yes, that _is_ one of your problems.