Connect with us

short circuit detector

Discussion in 'General Electronics Discussion' started by ratstar, Nov 2, 2020.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. ratstar

    ratstar

    478
    18
    Aug 20, 2018
    got another one for u dudes to gawk at the insane simplicity. =)

    [​IMG]
    I replaced the picture for a better one, more descriptive and in voltage divider mode instead of current divider to save overloading the led.
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2020
  2. Harald Kapp

    Harald Kapp Moderator Moderator

    11,133
    2,539
    Nov 17, 2011
    What is your power supply going to be?
    With only 1 Ω in series with the LED you'll need veeery tight regulation of that supply otherwise the LED will burn through quickly and your "detector" will show a permanent short circuit.
     
    ratstar likes this.
  3. ratstar

    ratstar

    478
    18
    Aug 20, 2018
    I think a 9v battery will do.
    I can see u understand the circuit, because of what you said.
     
  4. Harald Kapp

    Harald Kapp Moderator Moderator

    11,133
    2,539
    Nov 17, 2011
    9 V to an LED with 1 Ω series resistor will result in ~7 A current.
    Don't worry about draining the battery: The LED will burn through much quicker.
     
  5. ratstar

    ratstar

    478
    18
    Aug 20, 2018
    but its 4.5 volts cause its in a voltage divider, and you can light an led off a battery with no resistor fine, with the volt reduction I think would be about safe.
     
  6. Harald Kapp

    Harald Kapp Moderator Moderator

    11,133
    2,539
    Nov 17, 2011
    Before you edited your image there was only one 1 Ω resistor, you "secretly" added a second one.
    Even with two 1 Ω resistors current through the LED will be ~ 3.5 A, still way too high.
    Yes, once, for a few milliseconds.
    Do not think, do the math -> no this won't work.
     
    Cannonball, Martaine2005 and davenn like this.
  7. ratstar

    ratstar

    478
    18
    Aug 20, 2018
    The second resistor, makes it a voltage divider, so only half the power of the battery hits the led. it should be safe. but i spose, I could be wrong...

    The fact that the invention actually works is not as important as the led frying with the wrong resistance, is it.
    U guys help keep my work safe from plagiarists, thankyou.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2020
  8. AnalogKid

    AnalogKid

    2,462
    711
    Jun 10, 2015
    With this circuit, I don't think that's a problem.

    ak
     
    OBW0549 likes this.
  9. ratstar

    ratstar

    478
    18
    Aug 20, 2018
    Why? it cant be because it doesnt work, because it does.
    Is it because its so easy everyone already knows?

    Have a look at this circuit on the internet-> (these guys dont know...)

    https://www.instructables.com/Short-Circuit-Detector-Part-1/

    Its overcomplicated, and I doubt it even works.
    You guys are lucky you have me here to point out these things to you. (im sorry if it offends the ego a little tho...)
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2020
  10. Harald Kapp

    Harald Kapp Moderator Moderator

    11,133
    2,539
    Nov 17, 2011
    Are we? Or are you lucky to be still here?
     
    Alec_t, OBW0549 and Martaine2005 like this.
  11. ratstar

    ratstar

    478
    18
    Aug 20, 2018
    If I count my blessings (albiet in an unavoidable circumstance.), I guess so.

    Im just letting you guys know that a voltage divider is enough to detect short circuits. isnt that clever.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2020
  12. Bluejets

    Bluejets

    4,598
    975
    Oct 5, 2014
    Wally..??

     
    Martaine2005 likes this.
  13. ratstar

    ratstar

    478
    18
    Aug 20, 2018
    So u think it isnt true?
     
  14. Harald Kapp

    Harald Kapp Moderator Moderator

    11,133
    2,539
    Nov 17, 2011
    If you want to keep your "inventions" from being used by others then don't post here. This is a public forum, open for everyone to read.
     
    ratstar likes this.
  15. ratstar

    ratstar

    478
    18
    Aug 20, 2018
    yes. sneaky business! =) u guys are an enigma to me.
     
  16. AnalogKid

    AnalogKid

    2,462
    711
    Jun 10, 2015
    Do you mean 'anathema"?

    ak
     
  17. ratstar

    ratstar

    478
    18
    Aug 20, 2018
    of course not, I love you guys. enigma as i meant, meant someone that is misunderstood by me.
     
  18. AnalogKid

    AnalogKid

    2,462
    711
    Jun 10, 2015
    It will do something, but not something useful. In this circuit, the beeper is on constantly until the probes are connected to a resistance of something less than 10,000 to 100,000 ohms. At that point the transistors attempt to place a dead short across the battery to turn *off* the beeper.

    It is clear from the schematic what the intent of the design was, but he got it wrong. BTW, this is to be expected from "Instructables". If you check the archives of this and other forum sites, you will find that many of his postings are wrong, and some are dangerous.

    ak
     
    ratstar likes this.
  19. AnalogKid

    AnalogKid

    2,462
    711
    Jun 10, 2015
    Only at the concept level. To us it isn't useful because of the strain it puts on the battery.

    ak
     
    ratstar likes this.
  20. ratstar

    ratstar

    478
    18
    Aug 20, 2018
    Thats understandable. I wonder if that wasnt the case maybe thered be some way to turn finish it off into an ohmmeter but unfortunately doesnt work very well...
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-