No... Didn't you see the retard's little wink at the end of his
horseshit?
Still doesn't change the fact that he has "issues".
Didn't have to start at the 'beginning'. All you had to do was read
the message being replied to rather than, as I said, pulling one
sentence out of context.
Considering your inability to handle more than one sentence at a time
and complete lack of reading comprehension skills and logic I was
tempted to say the same about you. But then I guess a few dummies
slipped through even in the 'good ole days'.
You must be...
they also employ tactics like claiming "racism","discrimination",or the
over-used "fascism".
Then they attempt to ruin the person's employment and lives using that.
Look at what happened to that Harvard professor who commented on women's
abilities in hard sciences,and is fighting to retain his job.
And he's a diehard liberal!!
So much for the vaunted liberal desire for "diversity";definitely NO
diverse opinions if they conflict with liberal views.
Ah, the old classic out of context one liner quote, snip the rest, and
go zinging off on an unrelated topic.
The merits, or not, of any particular policy, and that includes your
opinions on drug use, have nothing to do with the topic I was
discussing, which was the means by which policy is 'debated'.
Factually untrue, as even a most careless perusal of the budget would
reveal.
I believe statistics show that the U.S. spends more, per student , on
both primary and secondary education than any other country, and by a
rather hefty margin.
The harder drugs are not being smuggled in because cannabis is
illegal; the harder ones are illegal too.
I guess you missed prohibition in history class.
Come on, fucktard. Back up your bullshit.
When, in the entire escalation of cannabis use since the sixties, has
there been documentation of any THC related accidents?
Yes
There hasn't.
Bull
Yet recently, law enforcement retards want us all to
think there has due to us citing this anomaly in their logic.
So they show stats on positive tests for THC in recent traffic
accidents and stops.
Problem is that there is NO test for THC IN the body. The test only
finds metabolites which indicate that THC had been in the body... at
some time in the last TWO MONTHS.
Hardly a valid statistic pointer.
Come back when you actually have a clue.
To start with, why don't you give us all stats on traffic accidents in
countries where THC use is legal and prevalent?
What's that? Oh yeah... fucking silence is hard to hear.
And as I said... **** YOU, and **** OFF, BOY!
"Dummies" is not a word, dipshit... at least not of the meaning your
retarded ass intended.
Telling you to **** OFF again.
Idiots like you are the reason why despite us having all this great
electronic technology, and medical technology, etc. etc., we still cannot
stop killing each other.
Hey... I know! We could have one last kill session where we cull out
all the bad and are left only with "civil folk".
Ooops... hasn't that always been the goal as well as the reason?
The window of opportunity for mankind to have repaired their basic
faults died a couple thousand years ago when we killed The Son of God
himself.
Telling you to **** OFF again.
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:56:44 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
[snip]
You might be getting cause and effect mixed up with the
liberal/progressive tendencies. Perhaps it is the property of having a
broad education that makes one seem like a 'liberal'.
Naaaah! It's part of the mental defectiveness that thinks a label
(PhD) infuses intelligence.
Whereas Jim represents the kind of mental deficiency that fails to see
that it is kind of difficult to do the work required to get a Ph.D.
without having a fair measure of intelligence to start with - IQ tests
on people who have managed to get a Ph.D. suggest that they are pretty
much all drawn from that tail of the population with IQ's of 115 or
higher. Of course, once you've got over that threshold, your IQ-score
doesn't correlate to any significant extent with your subsequent
success.
Jim was once intelligent enough to qualify for membeship of Mensa,
which does go to show that the intelligence defined by IQ tests is a
rather narrowly applicable skill.
Slowman hits a home run.
On Nov 17, 4:39 pm, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:56:44 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
[snip]
You might be getting cause and effect mixed up with the
liberal/progressive tendencies. Perhaps it is the property of having a
broad education that makes one seem like a 'liberal'.
Naaaah! It's part of the mental defectiveness that thinks a label
(PhD) infuses intelligence.
Whereas Jim represents the kind of mental deficiency that fails to see
that it is kind of difficult to do the work required to get a Ph.D.
without having a fair measure of intelligence to start with - IQ tests
on people who have managed to get a Ph.D. suggest that they are pretty
much all drawn from that tail of the population with IQ's of 115 or
higher. Of course, once you've got over that threshold, your IQ-score
doesn't correlate to any significant extent with your subsequent
success.
Jim was once intelligent enough to qualify for membeship of Mensa,
which does go to show that the intelligence defined by IQ tests is a
rather narrowly applicable skill.
Slowman hits a home run.
Looked like a foul ball to me.
PhD's, in industry settings, are the least productive of all
employees... least cash-flow per dollar invested.
For example, Bob Widlar didn't even complete his undergraduate degree
until many years in industry.
And Slowman can't hold a job.
...Jim Thompson
On Nov 17, 4:39 pm, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:56:44 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
[snip]
You might be getting cause and effect mixed up with the
liberal/progressive tendencies. Perhaps it is the property of having a
broad education that makes one seem like a 'liberal'.
Naaaah! It's part of the mental defectiveness that thinks a label
(PhD) infuses intelligence.
Whereas Jim represents the kind of mental deficiency that fails to see
that it is kind of difficult to do the work required to get a Ph.D.
without having a fair measure of intelligence to start with - IQ tests
on people who have managed to get a Ph.D. suggest that they are pretty
much all drawn from that tail of the population with IQ's of 115 or
higher. Of course, once you've got over that threshold, your IQ-score
doesn't correlate to any significant extent with your subsequent
success.
Jim was once intelligent enough to qualify for membeship of Mensa,
which does go to show that the intelligence defined by IQ tests is a
rather narrowly applicable skill.Slowman hits a home run.
Looked like a foul ball to me.
PhD's, in industry settings, are the least productive of all
employees... least cash-flow per dollar invested.
For example, Bob Widlar didn't even complete his undergraduate degree
until many years in industry.
And Slowman can't hold a job.
Lenny Bruce used to claim that the war on drugs was merely a
conspiracy between the FBI and Mafia aimed at maximising the profits
the Mafia got from pushing the drugs and the kick-backs the FBI got
from looking the other way. In the Netherlands it turns out that the
governemnt can save money by giving drugs addicts their fix for free
(provided that the addicts shoot up under supervision so they can't
sell on part of their maintenance dose). It costs money to provide the
drugs and the supervision, but more than pays for itself by minimising
the problems created by desperate addicts.
Jim Thompson said:Pha-a-a-a-art ;-)
"Cannabis use has been associated with increased risk of becoming
involved in traffic accidents; however, the relation between THC
concentration and driver impairment is relatively obscure.
Besides ignoring that the testing mechanism measures levels and not
simply 'something detected', try considering, just for starters Mr.
Genius, the driver and/or passengers admitting to use.
There's more than one way to gather data than your Simple Simon
propaganda suggests.
