Maker Pro
Maker Pro

diodes for SMPS

S

Stefan Heinzmann

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim said:
Aren't we all? I prefer that I be called "eccentric" ;-)

Isn't that the privilege of the British? ;-)
 
J

John Woodgate

Jan 1, 1970
0
I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill
Actually, he was said to be a class-A jerk. :>)

But he lived a long time ago, didn't he? Newton was also a class-A jerk,
by today's standards.
 
J

John Woodgate

Jan 1, 1970
0
I read in sci.electronics.design that Jim Thompson
Aren't we all? I prefer that I be called "eccentric" ;-)

That's a crank that has only a small effect, isn't it? Personally, I
don't aspire to class A status.
 
S

Spehro Pefhany

Jan 1, 1970
0
Stefan Heinzmann wrote...

Actually, he was said to be a class-A jerk. :>)

Somewhat inefficient, but gets the job done?

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
 
S

Spehro Pefhany

Jan 1, 1970
0
Spehro Pefhany <Spehro Pefhany wrote...

What have you seen in the more carefully-written literature?

In your book, I don't seen any "S/schottky" references alone,
referring to a device. "S/schottky diode" is always capitalized.
"D/darlington" is always capitalized. Neither "Z/zener" nor Z/zener
diode is ever capitalized.

What did poor old Clarence Melvin Zener do to earn your contempt? ;-)

http://store.aip.org/OA_HTML/ibeCCtpItmDspRte.jsp?site=AIP&respid=50212&item=36982

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
 
W

Winfield Hill

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim Thompson wrote...
Aren't we all?

Can I quote your admission, later, as needed? :>)

Thanks,
- Win

whill_at_picovolt-dot-com
 
J

John Woodgate

Jan 1, 1970
0
I read in sci.electronics.design that Spehro Pefhany <Spehro@Pefhany.?>
wrote (in said:
Somewhat inefficient, but gets the job done?

While getting quite hot. But with good linearity.

What can we make out of jerk = d^3x/dt^3?
 
J

John Woodgate

Jan 1, 1970
0
I read in sci.electronics.design that Spehro Pefhany <Spehro@Pefhany.?>
What did poor old Clarence Melvin Zener do to earn your contempt? ;-)

Broke down at only 5.6 V? And had poor knees?
 
J

Jim Thompson

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim Thompson wrote...

Can I quote your admission, later, as needed? :>)

Thanks,
- Win

whill_at_picovolt-dot-com

Permission granted!

...Jim Thompson
 
E

Eric Chang

Jan 1, 1970
0
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Typically, ATX power supplies use diodes with substantially larger
voltage ratings than twice the supply voltage. The reason for this is
that leakage inductance causes spikes which add to the reverse voltage
that the diode must withstand. An 80V requirement is not at all
excessive. If you look at test results for ATX power supplies, these
diodes are snubbed to only just below their ratings, with the actual
voltages measured with an oscilloscope.

I would agree with Stefan that the 60A rating is somewhat large.
There are other salvaged components that would be a weak link first.
The board I am making has multiple 250watt atx transformers on it and uses
other components from atx powersupplies, such as the input filtering caps,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

It seems that there is some desire to reuse components from the base
ATX supplies. I completely sympathize with this desire, since
otherwise they end up in the trash. Jamie will find it pretty
challenging to snub a 30V diode intended for the 5V supply for 24V
service. In fact, at 24V out, the diode would not even survive the
steady state. By changing to a full wave rectifier output, there is a
chance of success, but it will be necessary to over snub and carefully
bring down the size of the snubber while monitoring with a load.
Else, pop!
....

I think I know what Jamie is trying to make. This is a challenging
project.
 
B

Bill Sloman

Jan 1, 1970
0
John Woodgate said:
I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill


But he lived a long time ago, didn't he? Newton was also a class-A jerk,
by today's standards.

Newton was a class-A jerk by the standards of his day, too.

Hooke and Wren were much more aimiable characters, if less expert
mathematicians, and Leibnitz sounds as if he was pleasant enough, and
pretty much comparable in mathematical talent.
 
Top