Jim,
Oliver, There's a way to do it... I just do it so
rarely that I'll have to dig thru my archives...
I've used it in the past to bracket 10K and 100K
ECL testing versus temperature.
Oh, do please post how to access the circuit
temperature(not the number 27) from inside a
parameterized expression. I'm dying to see
it.
When Mikey is not picking on Kevin...
I don't pick on Kevin. He starts it. But
I shouldn't get involved with him or I just
get irritated when I even tell him exactly
how to write a SPICE that runs as well as
mine and he's nothing but insults for it.
It's impossible.
he likes to throw stones at PSpice...
That's not true, you just take it personal.
I don't waste any time looking for muck
on PSpice, I just get decks e-mailed to
me that run differently between LTspice
and PSpice so I have a library of PSpice
bugs, since as often as not, a PSpice
bug is the cause of the discrepancy.
unfortunately he's really not very well
versed in PSpice notation.
I'm not? Isn't that a well known PSpice
bug? Modeling people I know are
disappointed by not being able to
parameterize models by temperature
outside of a few special tc's and tce's,
some of which those don't work right
either. Anyway, isn't the bug clearly
demonstrated by this deck?
* V(1) should be equal to V(2)
..param tc=.01
I2 0 1 1m
R1 1 0 1K tc={tc}
I3 0 2 1m
R3 2 0 {1K*(1+(temp-27)*tc)}
..temp 100
..tran 1 1
..probe
..end
--Mike