You bent perception, E-1 grade retarded ****!That pretty much takes care of your "trust me" credibility on driving
while under the influence.
In case you missed it, you just admitted that another of your B.S.
arguments, "There is no test for THC in the blood," is false.
It IS the only means in use, idiot. Some lame research claim doesn'tDoesn't make it easy, does it? But the degree of accuracy wasn't the
topic, it was your false claim that the 'only' means of gathering data
was a urine test and that's demonstrably false.
Your credibility is zero and arguing about consuming a pound only
highlights that fact.
That would tend to explain your irrationality on this topic but, then,
'single puff' medicinal use isn't driving while inebriated, now is it?
Now that you've gone completely delusional there's little point in
continuing.
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:29:09 -0800, "Herbert John \"Jackie\" Gleason"
39 pm, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:56:44 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
[snip]
You might be getting cause and effect mixed up with the
liberal/progressive tendencies. Perhaps it is the property of having a
broad education that makes one seem like a 'liberal'.
Naaaah! It's part of the mental defectiveness that thinks a label
(PhD) infuses intelligence.
Whereas Jim represents the kind of mental deficiency that fails to see
that it is kind of difficult to do the work required to get a Ph.D.
without having a fair measure of intelligence to start with - IQ tests
on people who have managed to get a Ph.D. suggest that they are pretty
much all drawn from that tail of the population with IQ's of 115 or
higher. Of course, once you've got over that threshold, your IQ-score
doesn't correlate to any significant extent with your subsequent
success.
Jim was once intelligent enough to qualify for membeship of Mensa,
which does go to show that the intelligence defined by IQ tests is a
rather narrowly applicable skill.
Slowman hits a home run.Looked like a foul ball to me.PhD's, in industry settings, are the least productive of all
employees... least cash-flow per dollar invested.For example, Bob Widlar didn't even complete his undergraduate degree
until many years in industry.And Slowman can't hold a job....Jim Thompson
Can you imagine working with him? Entire departments would quit, or
drop dead from sheer boredom and force-of-pontification.
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:50:38 -0800, John Larkin
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:33:30 -0800, "Herbert John \"Jackie\" Gleason"
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:45:49 -0800, John Larkin
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:13:23 -0700, Jim Thompson
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:29:09 -0800, "Herbert John \"Jackie\" Gleason"
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:30:40 -0800 (PST), [email protected] wrote:
On Nov 17, 4:39 pm, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:56:44 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
[snip]
You might be getting cause and effect mixed up with the
liberal/progressive tendencies. Perhaps it is the property of having a
broad education that makes one seem like a 'liberal'.
Naaaah! It's part of the mental defectiveness that thinks a label
(PhD) infuses intelligence.
Whereas Jim represents the kind of mental deficiency that fails to see
that it is kind of difficult to do the work required to get a Ph.D.
without having a fair measure of intelligence to start with - IQ tests
on people who have managed to get a Ph.D. suggest that they are pretty
much all drawn from that tail of the population with IQ's of 115 or
higher. Of course, once you've got over that threshold, your IQ-score
doesn't correlate to any significant extent with your subsequent
success.
Jim was once intelligent enough to qualify for membeship of Mensa,
which does go to show that the intelligence defined by IQ tests is a
rather narrowly applicable skill.
Slowman hits a home run.
Looked like a foul ball to me.
PhD's, in industry settings, are the least productive of all
employees... least cash-flow per dollar invested.
For example, Bob Widlar didn't even complete his undergraduate degree
until many years in industry.
And Slowman can't hold a job.
...Jim Thompson
Can you imagine working with him? Entire departments would quit, or
drop dead from sheer boredom and force-of-pontification.
John
Better than working with some holier than thou dope that refuses to use
a machine properly, because of his claim that what he has been doing
works and has worked through x dollars of sales.
You have some prejudice against x dollars of sales? Or doing what
works?
No.. Just a prejudice against asswipes that blatantly disregard proper
operational methods, parameters, and instructions.
Have you ever done a VOC immersion bath test on your crap after your
"cleaning" "method"?
Why should we? The stuff works, the customers pay the invoices, and
you still hide behing juvenile nyms.
**** you, Johnny. Usenet is an anonymous forum from my perspective,
and retards like you are the main reason why I stay that way.
When are you going to tell us that you are gay?
If you do not know what a VOC test bath is, then you cannot make remarks
about how clean your boards are.
Even the smallest of contract Mfgrs out there perform such tests. Are
you really that fucking tight with your dough that you cannot conform to
the standard practices used by the ENTIRE industry which you claim to be
a part of?
I don't care how many x dollars you have sold or made, if your shop is
a backwoods, half asses affair I wouldn't buy your CRAP if you were the
only source in the world for it.
Actually, I don't know. Please explain it to us.
It is a machine full of ultra-clean solvent that one places a claimed
to be clean assembly into. After a period of time the assembly is
removed, and the machine analyses the solvent for VOCs (you do at least
know what that is, right?) and creates a report on how clean your post
solder cleaning job is on your assemblies.
I really am surprised that you, after having "contamination issues"
under your SMT parts (so you claimed), would not be familiar with the
process.
Nope, you just dunk your shit into your bath of shit and then call it
clean.
You have no clue what rational is, boy.
None that gets used regularly, dumbfuck.
In a research lab on rats maybe.
List for me, you retarded asswipe, all the human based studies that are
going on in the US or that have ever gone on.
The number is quite low, I assure you.
It IS the only means in use, idiot.
Some lame research claim doesn't
count when all that gets used on a daily basis is other than that. The
cops rely on what they use to state their stats, you retarded ****. Those
stats are based on the metabolite indicator test.
You're a goddamned idiot. It took over 2 lbs to kill a rat, and he
died from being overstuffed, not the THC.
If you had any clue at all, you would know that THC and cannabis have
the highest LD-50 rating of any substance known to man.
If you don't know what that is, you don't belong in the discussion,
asswipe.
You bent perception, E-1 grade retarded ****!
It has NOTHING to do with it.
I have driven trucks commercially, cars, bikes, etc.
So now you think that reciting the ABCs forward and backward (without
singing them) is a reasonable driving capacity test?
How long's the incubation period?
If college economists were so good,they'd all be rich.
That's rather amusing coming from someone who's predominate
'arguments' spawn from a limited repertoire of gutter epithets.
California rats, no doubt. Or have you also changed your claim
California uses it?
