I
Ian
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
G'Day all,
Can anyone give me the quick summary as to why the plane eath RF
propogation model doesn't include a frequency term?
I have seen a reference that the plane earth model is pretty much only
useful in the UHF band and hence maybe the freq term becomes
insignificant, that is the additional loss introduced by frequency
does not vary much over the UHF range. Is that the reasoning?
http://www.radioinnovation.com/Howto/how_far2.htm gives some details
but it bothers me that freq doesn't come into it.
My application is *not* inbuilding so I am not using one of the more
elaborate scattering models. However, my antenna heights are
potentially quite low, so I suspect a simple plane-earth model will be
somewhat optimistic, anyway.
Thanks,
Ian
Can anyone give me the quick summary as to why the plane eath RF
propogation model doesn't include a frequency term?
I have seen a reference that the plane earth model is pretty much only
useful in the UHF band and hence maybe the freq term becomes
insignificant, that is the additional loss introduced by frequency
does not vary much over the UHF range. Is that the reasoning?
http://www.radioinnovation.com/Howto/how_far2.htm gives some details
but it bothers me that freq doesn't come into it.
My application is *not* inbuilding so I am not using one of the more
elaborate scattering models. However, my antenna heights are
potentially quite low, so I suspect a simple plane-earth model will be
somewhat optimistic, anyway.
Thanks,
Ian