Connect with us

On Max Bandwidth of an Analog O'scope

Discussion in 'Electronic Equipment' started by alpha_uma, Sep 2, 2004.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. alpha_uma

    alpha_uma Guest

    I need some clarification on the concept. Is there any relationship at all
    between a 'scope's max sweep rate and its rated max bandwidth in its specs
    (shown, for example, on a metal model tag on the front of the 'scope)? If
    the max sweep time/div is 0.2 microsec, is it incorrect/simplistic to think
    that 1/(0.2 microsec) = 5MHz is the max bandwidth (because of the
    mathematics of things like Nyquist Criteria)?

    (For example, the front of the following V-212 o'scope says 20MHz, but it
    has a max sweep rate of 0.2 microsec:
    http://imagehost.vendio.com/bin/vie..._link=1&track=0229d299cf-d6442&pt=bidpay&sp=1)

    Thank you.
    Al-U
     
  2. Robert Baer

    Robert Baer Guest

    There is a crude "relationship"; one spec cannot be used to determine
    the other.
     
  3. Jim Yanik

    Jim Yanik Guest

    No,there's no relation.Bandwidth is a spec for the vertical amp and CRT
    upper limit,and sweep rates determine how much horizontal resolution you
    can see on a signal,like part of one cycle or period,or just 2 or 3
    cycles/periods.Horizontal sweep rates are tougher because you not only need
    speed,you need better linearity.(1 div measures the same anywhere on the
    sweep)

    Then there's sweep magnifiers;essentially increasing the gain of the
    horizontal output amp,and only displaying a small portion(1/10th for an X10
    mag) of the full sweep.
     
  4. The bandwidth - usually given at the 3dB point - indicates the
    performance of the vertical amplifier. There is no relation between
    this and the sweep generator except that some human was hopefully
    involved at some point of the process and hopefully made a vaguely sane
    decision.

    Suppose you had a 20 MHz oscilloscope with a maximum sweep rate of 1
    microsecond per division (an exaggerated case). If you put a 20 MHz
    signal into it, you'd see 20 cycles in one division - it would just be a
    glowing rectangle on your screen. If you did the same thing on an
    oscilloscope with a lower bandwidth and same sweep speed, you wouldn't
    get the rectangle - you'd just get a line, because the vertical
    amplifier couldn't reproduce the 20 MHz signal.

    So, why do oscilloscopes tend to have an analog bandwidth beyond what
    you seem to think is necessary based on the sweep speed? It's so that
    you can see more complex waveforms than sine waves at the maximum sweep
    speed. Say you have your 0.2 us/dev scope, and you want to see a 5 MHz
    square wave. You'll need to be able to reproduce several harmonics of 5
    MHz in order for your wave to look square instead of sinusoidal.
     
  5. alpha_uma

    alpha_uma Guest

    Very helpful explanation. Thanks

    Let me see if I get this arithmetic correct. With a 20MHz input sine wave
    (say, 2V peak-to-peak), if I increase the sweep speed from 1 microsec per
    div to 0.2 microsec per div, the display on the V-212 o'scope will then
    (theoretically) change from showing a "fuzzy" rectangle to showing 4 cycles
    per division instead. But 4 cycles per division is still relatively
    "crowded" in the limited physical screen space of a division. And since the
    V-212 only has max sweep speed of 0.2 microsec/div, it will be impossible to
    see any finer details of this input sine wave on the V-212. Am I getting it
    correct so far?

    Is the following thinking correct?

    1. As the bandwidth of the o'scope is a function of the "sophistication" of
    the vertical amplifier, would it be correct to say that the bandwidth is a
    function of the "resolution" of the output signal from the vertical
    amplifier?

    2. Having faster sweep speeds is just as important as having enough
    bandwidth. Faster sweep speeds allow us to see more details. Switching to a
    faster sweep speed allows us to "zoom-in" closer to see finer details.

    Thanks
     
  6. dd

    dd Guest

    A hobby horse of mine:
    Analog scopes (CRT without A/D converter) are often better than digital
    because dynamic range is much greater than that given by 12 to 16 bits .
     
  7. dd wrote...
    12 bits maybe, but not 16. And that's rarely the reason that analog
    scopes can be superior.
     
  8. Keyser Soze

    Keyser Soze Guest

    Lets just say that you can see some really strange things on a digital
    scope that do not appear on an analog scope of the same bandwidth.

    Remember that any digital scope uses quantization and is an
    approximation of a continuous system.

    An analog scope will render a more faithful representation and degrade
    less strangely near its bandwidth limit.

    There is no substitute for knowing how your tools work.
     
  9. That sounds right.
    I wouldn't really put it that way. Resolution is a more suitable
    concept for talking about digital, and sophistication isn't a precisely
    defined term except maybe in marketing.
    Sometimes seeing a vertical line is useful, it's just that looking at
    sine waves isn't one of those times. For example, to see a square wave,
    you'll need a higher bandwidth than to see a sine wave of the same
    frequency, but you won't need a faster sweep speed.
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-