So I'm going thru my labs on reactance, and my measurements are coming close, but not really close enough for my tastes. I realized that I'm just assuming the inductance value from the code on the side of the inductor, and not actually measuring it. So, out of the many ways to measure inductance, I found this very simple one by Tim Daycounter that allows me to use the stuff I have, namely a scope and a DMM.
The theory is simple: with a known resistor value, build a series LR circuit, apply a small AC voltage, and adjust the frequency until voltage across just the resistor is half that of the whole. then use this formula: L= R*sqrt(3)/(2*pi*f) to get your L value.
So the brainteaser is this: Is that voltage measurement across the R peak, or rms? I get a significantly different result depending on which I measure. If the answer is peak, then that correlates pretty nicely with all the labs I've been doing. I had assumed a 100mH inductor, but with the above method (measuring peak) it looks like the dang thing is more like 83 mH. (And at rms, my value drops further to 75 mH).
Thanks.
The theory is simple: with a known resistor value, build a series LR circuit, apply a small AC voltage, and adjust the frequency until voltage across just the resistor is half that of the whole. then use this formula: L= R*sqrt(3)/(2*pi*f) to get your L value.
So the brainteaser is this: Is that voltage measurement across the R peak, or rms? I get a significantly different result depending on which I measure. If the answer is peak, then that correlates pretty nicely with all the labs I've been doing. I had assumed a 100mH inductor, but with the above method (measuring peak) it looks like the dang thing is more like 83 mH. (And at rms, my value drops further to 75 mH).
Thanks.