Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Generate -100V DC

G

Genome

Jan 1, 1970
0
|
| You shouldn't have! If he couldn't get to square one with that
simplest
| of simplest and totally self-contained 8-pin 3578 where all he has to
do
| is paint by the numbers- or nomographs- then no chance in hell
| whatsoever with that Cuk. The OP is most likely a troll- no mention
| whatsoever of a single part number or operating parameter for his
| "prototype"- and a 2:1 range in acceptable output voltage?- all at
same
| maximum current?
|

Oh, errrr OK.

Perhaps I should try harder but I don't think I could do much with an
LM3578 other than get the DIP version stuck on my shoe.

DNA
 
F

Fred Bloggs

Jan 1, 1970
0
Genome said:
|
| You shouldn't have! If he couldn't get to square one with that
simplest
| of simplest and totally self-contained 8-pin 3578 where all he has to
do
| is paint by the numbers- or nomographs- then no chance in hell
| whatsoever with that Cuk. The OP is most likely a troll- no mention
| whatsoever of a single part number or operating parameter for his
| "prototype"- and a 2:1 range in acceptable output voltage?- all at
same
| maximum current?
|

Oh, errrr OK.

Perhaps I should try harder but I don't think I could do much with an
LM3578 other than get the DIP version stuck on my shoe.

DNA

LOL! Been there done that- )
 
G

Genome

Jan 1, 1970
0
|
|
| Genome wrote:
| > | > |
| > | You shouldn't have! If he couldn't get to square one with that
| > simplest
| > | of simplest and totally self-contained 8-pin 3578 where all he has
to
| > do
| > | is paint by the numbers- or nomographs- then no chance in hell
| > | whatsoever with that Cuk. The OP is most likely a troll- no
mention
| > | whatsoever of a single part number or operating parameter for his
| > | "prototype"- and a 2:1 range in acceptable output voltage?- all at
| > same
| > | maximum current?
| > |
| >
| > Oh, errrr OK.
| >
| > Perhaps I should try harder but I don't think I could do much with
an
| > LM3578 other than get the DIP version stuck on my shoe.
| >
| > DNA
| >
| >
|
| LOL! Been there done that- )
|

I'm quite serious; Read the data sheet, got no joy.

DNA
 
F

Fred Bloggs

Jan 1, 1970
0
Genome said:
|
|
| Genome wrote:
| > | > |
| > | You shouldn't have! If he couldn't get to square one with that
| > simplest
| > | of simplest and totally self-contained 8-pin 3578 where all he has
to
| > do
| > | is paint by the numbers- or nomographs- then no chance in hell
| > | whatsoever with that Cuk. The OP is most likely a troll- no
mention
| > | whatsoever of a single part number or operating parameter for his
| > | "prototype"- and a 2:1 range in acceptable output voltage?- all at
| > same
| > | maximum current?
| > |
| >
| > Oh, errrr OK.
| >
| > Perhaps I should try harder but I don't think I could do much with
an
| > LM3578 other than get the DIP version stuck on my shoe.
| >
| > DNA
| >
| >
|
| LOL! Been there done that- )
|

I'm quite serious; Read the data sheet, got no joy.

DNA

Well if he uses that TIP32C then he needs to back it off to 10KHz and
use something like a 47mH inductor.
 
Top