S
Sylvia Else
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Willem said:Sylvia Else wrote:
) Willem wrote:
)> Oh I had forgotten that. Slight amendment:
)>
)> Ask Person 1 the following question:
)> "What would Person 2 answer if I asked him if he is a Knight ?"
)
)> In case of silence, ask Person 3 the following question:
)> "What would Person 1 answer if I asked him if he is a Knight ?"
)
)> Else ask Person 2 the following question:
)> "What would Person 3 answer if I asked him if he is a Knight ?"
)
Look at question 1 again.
Let's try that again.
If I ask a Knight whether a Knave would say he's a Knight - the Knave
would say yes, so the Knight would say yes. If I ask a Knave whether a
Knight would say that he's a Knight, the Knight would say yes, so the
Knave would say no.
Considering the permuatations, R randomizer, T knighT, E knavE, and the
resulting answers, ? = Y/N, - = no answer.
R T E ? Y (Q2 is to P2 about P3).
R E T ? N ditto.
T R E - N (Q2 is to P3 about P1).
E R T - Y ditto.
T E R N - (Q2 is to P2 about P3).
E T R Y - ditto.
Yes, seems OK.
Sylvia.