J
John S
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Having unprotected FETs can lead to STD (Semiconductor Transient
Destruction).
Destruction).
Having unprotected FETs can lead to STD (Semiconductor Transient
Destruction).
"John S"
** Groannnn......
This dude has a FETish for very bad puns.
.... Phil
We shouldn't condome such behavior on SED."John S"
** Groannnn......
This dude has a FETish for very bad puns.
Glenn B said:.......... could end up with a nasty discharge I guess.
Please - I don't expect to be grossed out in an electronics design group........... could end up with a nasty discharge I guess.
Please - I don't expect to be grossed out in an electronics design group.
Sylvia.
Killfile Phil and then you'll never be psychologically abused?
...Jim Thompson
I remember the female lab tech at Burroughs getting really peaved at
the Engineers who kept blowing the Tektronix Diff FET Probes, rated
for 25V.
You can raise that much ESD voltage just by lifting one leg ( which
we often did with an ESD calibation test... changing the body
geometry, changes the body C which in turn changes the voltage (delta
V = Q / delta C) but it didn't take much to blow them. The FETS were
replaced often.
Usually fondling the ring and tip was the safest way to handle the
probe without the condom tip between hook ups. eww.
My fault, and I apologize to you. I did not think it would come to this.
Actually, I was attempting mild humour, which looks like it didn't work,
so I apologise to you.
Sylvia.
Thank you, but no need to apologise. I guess your humour was so mild
that I did not recognise it. So, it is more my fault than yours.
Cheers
(And now the entire group will accuse me of Chip-and-Dale hospitality,
or worse)
Hey, we're engineers. Borderline aspergers.
BTW, I guess you did not notice my very subtle humor?
Killfile Phil and then you'll never be psychologically abused?
Because we work for a living. The rich get *us* to work for a living.Ah yes, that. What would the world do without us. Remind me again why
we're not rich.
Sorry I should have added the smiley face. I was trying to 'pun' condone with condom. (Everyone probably thought it was just another spelling mistake on my part.)
George H.
=
condone with condom. (Everyone probably thought it was just another =
spelling mistake on my part.)
=46ret not, for at least i got it.
?-)
You can say the pun has been "electronically tested".
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany