# Transformer question

Discussion in 'Electronics Homework Help' started by brownr72, Aug 12, 2010.

1. ### brownr72

Joined:
Aug 12, 2010
Messages:
1
0
Last edited: Oct 13, 2010
brownr72, Aug 12, 2010

2. ### (*steve*)¡sǝpodᴉʇuɐ ǝɥʇ ɹɐǝɥdModerator

Joined:
Jan 21, 2010
Messages:
23,032
2,042
Location:
Mid way between Beijing and the Ronne Ice Shelf
Because the power remains constant (less any loss in the transformer)

power = voltage * current

(It's a bit more complex than that, but that is enough to show you why)

(*steve*), Aug 12, 2010

3. ### Militoy

Joined:
Aug 24, 2010
Messages:
180
0
Location:
Mojave Desert, CA, USA
Good answer – even though the question is a bit misleading. To put it in concrete physical terms, any particular transformer design is limited in power output by its ability to effectively shed heat. Continuously overload a transformer of any size, and it will ultimately burn up through failure of its insulation system. Within the limits of any fixed size of transformer, there is a finite, fixed limit of allowable power loss. Increasing output voltage means increasing the number of secondary turns. With a given size core, to physically fit more turns on the secondary, the size of the secondary wire must be reduced. The additional number of turns also increases the total resistive length of the secondary winding. More turns / smaller wire = higher secondary resistance = lower output current at the fixed limit of allowable secondary power loss.

Militoy, Aug 25, 2010
4. ### Resqueline

Joined:
Jul 31, 2009
Messages:
2,848
1
While I doubt that the o/p (a spammer) will comprehend (or care) about neither the question nor the answer, someone else might benefit. Thanks.

Resqueline, Sep 1, 2010
5. ### Militoy

Joined:
Aug 24, 2010
Messages:
180
0
Location:
Mojave Desert, CA, USA
Thanks for "scraping" up the spam, Resqueline - I never spotted it - and though I have to admit I eat the greasy canned variety from time to time, I never appreciate having the other kind jammed into my face!

Militoy, Sep 2, 2010
6. ### Resqueline

Joined:
Jul 31, 2009
Messages:
2,848
1
Hehe, yes, even if canned & greasy some kinds are certainly more "digestible" than others. Then there are the grey areas too.
They devise ever changing ways so one has to be really vigilant, and some can be hard to distinguish from simply "unenlightened" individuals.
The latest "fad" seems to be editing in a link a couple of days after posting the first seemingly lame but harmless question, hoping it will go by unnoticed by the mods.

Resqueline, Sep 2, 2010

Joined:
Jan 21, 2010
Messages:
23,032