Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Spk <-> Rcv Q: Red+ to Red+ and Black- to Black- ? or: R+ to B- and B- to R+ ?

S

Skybuck Flying

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hello,

I am in the process of setting up my 7.1 Surround Sound Receiver and I have
a question:

1. The satellites/speakers have a RED + and a BLACK -.
2. The surround sound receiver has RED + and BLACK -.

The question is:

1.

Should the RED + on the speaker be connected to the RED + on the receiver ?
Should the BLACK - on the speaker be connected to the BLACK - on the
receiver ?

or

2.

Should the RED + on the speaker be connected to the BLACK - on the receiver?
Should the BLACK - on the speaker be connected to the RED + on the receiver
?

(Satellites/speakers are Gigaworks S700/S750)
(Receiver is Denon AVR 1909)

Soon I will let you guys know what I think of the receiver, the sound, and I
will hopefully have pictures up too... (I am gonna try and use microsoft web
drive/live, since my isp
webdrive is full).

But for now... please answer my question to the best of your abilities so I
can start testing out this puppy !

(I connected the RED + to the RED + and BLACK - to BLACK -, I am not sure if
that's the correct way to connect them...)

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
S

Skybuck Flying

Jan 1, 1970
0
And another source which says to connect:

Red+ToRed+ and Black-ToBlack-.

So I think I am ok ;)

I did use some "video" cables as audio cables (for sb to receiver) but I
think that will work as well.

Fingers crossed ! ;)

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
P

Pim Schaeffer

Jan 1, 1970
0
Skybuck said:
Hello,

I am in the process of setting up my 7.1 Surround Sound Receiver and I have
a question:

RTFM
 
K

Kalman Rubinson

Jan 1, 1970
0
It's not in the FM.

Well, it is illustrated on the "Getting Started" sheet and
on pages 9 and 10 of the manual.

Typically, you ask questions which are readily answered by
reading the documentation or, for most of us, self-evident
making the arrogance of some of your responses unwarranted.

Kal
 
S

Skybuck Flying

Jan 1, 1970
0
Oh gjez, didn't even notice those white things.

Illustration not terribly clear...

Could have been better.

I certainly missed it ! ;)

Also figures are not to be trusted "they" always say that in manuals.

"Reality might be different from illustration" something like that...

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
V

V__i__n_ce__19_7_1_

Jan 1, 1970
0
Skybuck said:
Oh gjez, didn't even notice those white things.

Illustration not terribly clear...

Could have been better.

I certainly missed it ! ;)

Also figures are not to be trusted "they" always say that in manuals.

"Reality might be different from illustration" something like that...

Bye,
Skybuck.

Stop post crossing in the dutch ng...thanks.
 
Top