Maker Pro
Maker Pro

NPO ceramic vs polypropylene

L

legg

Jan 1, 1970
0
I tried *hard* to find a source for a polystyrene cap a couple
years ago, for use in a picoamp integrate-and-dump.

The answer came back "No mas." Several sources said the
film was no longer being made; and only a few cap-makers were
still producing from life-time buys of the raw material.
Digikey shows none, today.

That led to comparing dielectrics. It was tempting to try
NP0. The dielectric absorption and leakage looked low, but
there wasn't time. We found a PS supplier, ultimately, and
a polypropylene part for back up.

Cheers,
James Arthur

Of course they're no longer offered by the major players, but you can
still get 63V, 160V and 630V rated parts below 10,000pf in both axial
and radial form from distribution (RS, Rapid, ~Mouser~).

They are about as common as commercial tuned circuits....

I see newer offerings in the audio lunatic fringe as well.

The older power components that used to use polystyrene are generally
replaced by films with better temperature limits....

RL
 
No, it doesn't have to be at Vcc/2, but it does have to be more than the
signal swing.

I meant by Vcc/2, centered on the audio signal (the local reference).
However, it really should be the average of the two references? I
guess I'm not seeing how this helps if the capacitance error isn't
split between the two caps. Perhaps I should figure out how to get an
accurate capacitor model and simulate this. I'm not seeing the magic.
 
Top