Maker Pro
Maker Pro

"Input" on an "output"

D

Don Y

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi,

I've added four hose bibbs around the yard, each behind an
electric solenoid (24V). The intent is for supplemental irrigation
for new plantings, etc. (attach hose to hose bibb; run hose
out to be proximate to the new planting; "program" irrigation
system to dispense water via this particular "hose circuit"
for the several weeks required to get root system established)

I'd like to be able to *manually* signal the irrigation
system that I would like the electric valve engaged (and,
later, possibly disengaged!). But, I don't really have a
spare conductor to dedicate to that purpose. :<

So, I figure I could *share* the "solenoid drive" function with
the "button sense" function.

(remember, this is outdoors in the weather so I'm not keen on
putting any electronics out there that won't appreciate the
heat, cold, water, sun, etc.)

I figure I can wire a NO button across the valve solenoid (either
directly or with some series resistance). Then, on the driving
side, sense this "short" when the solenoid is NOT energized (i.e.,
please turn ON the valve) as well as when it *is* energized (i.e.,
please turn OFF the valve).

[Similarly, I could add a NC button in series and "probe" the
load when off vs. on]

Any suggestions as to other issues that would make one of these
approaches better/worse than the other? Off hand, the NC in
series seems like it would be more troublesome (i.e., if the
button failed, the valve is not usable).

Or, cleverer solutions?

(I'll have to characterize the valves - and hope any replacements
in the future are similar!)

Thx,
--don
 
S

Spehro Pefhany

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi,

I've added four hose bibbs around the yard, each behind an
electric solenoid (24V). The intent is for supplemental irrigation
for new plantings, etc. (attach hose to hose bibb; run hose
out to be proximate to the new planting; "program" irrigation
system to dispense water via this particular "hose circuit"
for the several weeks required to get root system established)

I'd like to be able to *manually* signal the irrigation
system that I would like the electric valve engaged (and,
later, possibly disengaged!). But, I don't really have a
spare conductor to dedicate to that purpose. :<

So, I figure I could *share* the "solenoid drive" function with
the "button sense" function.

(remember, this is outdoors in the weather so I'm not keen on
putting any electronics out there that won't appreciate the
heat, cold, water, sun, etc.)

I figure I can wire a NO button across the valve solenoid (either
directly or with some series resistance). Then, on the driving
side, sense this "short" when the solenoid is NOT energized (i.e.,
please turn ON the valve) as well as when it *is* energized (i.e.,
please turn OFF the valve).

[Similarly, I could add a NC button in series and "probe" the
load when off vs. on]

Any suggestions as to other issues that would make one of these
approaches better/worse than the other? Off hand, the NC in
series seems like it would be more troublesome (i.e., if the
button failed, the valve is not usable).

Or, cleverer solutions?

(I'll have to characterize the valves - and hope any replacements
in the future are similar!)

Thx,
--don

The NC in series seems very straightforward. Just put 0.1mA or
something like that through the loop and detect an open circuit. Add a
time-out for instant indication of a broken switch or wire. No problem
with different types of solenoids.

The parallel version seems troublesome what with the possibility of
pushing the switch when the solenoid is energized and and the
relatively low resistance of the solenoid coil. You could probably do
something cute taking advantage of the inductance of the coil, but do
you want a project or a quick solution?


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
 
I figure I can wire a NO button across the valve solenoid (either
directly or with some series resistance). Then, on the driving
side, sense this "short" when the solenoid is NOT energized (i.e.,
please turn ON the valve) as well as when it *is* energized (i.e.,
please turn OFF the valve).

If you are talking about shorting the 24V supply line to signal it, you better have plenty of replacements ready. It might only work once, or not at all.
Or, cleverer solutions?

No, but cleaner solution:

The proper way is to RF from a handheld controller back to the 24V source, most likely inside your garage.

This controller has numeric keypad. So, you can use "*1" to turn #1 on, "#1" to turn #1 off, etc. The controller on the right can control eight or more relays. The problem is that you have to program it yourself. We only supply you the tools to do it. You need to program both the base and remote controllers.

http://173.224.223.62/rf/remote.jpg
 
D

Don Y

Jan 1, 1970
0
If you are talking about shorting the 24V supply line to signal it,
you better have plenty of replacements ready. It might only work
once, or not at all.

No, that would depend on what was "upstream" from the "short".
E.g., if driven by a current limited source, the button just
causes that limit to be engaged.
No, but cleaner solution:

The proper way is to RF from a handheld controller back to the 24V
source, most likely inside your garage.

This controller has numeric keypad. So, you can use "*1" to turn #1
on, "#1" to turn #1 off, etc. The controller on the right can control
eight or more relays. The problem is that you have to program it
yourself. We only supply you the tools to do it. You need to program
both the base and remote controllers.

Already have that (read post). Problem is it is not convenient.

E.g., if you are in the yard and decide you want to use the
hose to "fill a bucket", you'd have to run into the garage to
"enable" the water at a particular "faucet" (bibb); then, back
into the yard to manually open the (mechanical) valve on the
faucet; etc.

Much more convenient to push a button *at* the faucet (hose bibb),
turn the manual valve on, dispense water and then reverse the
process when done. (or, rely on an implicit timeout enforced by
the irrigation controller)
 
E.g., if you are in the yard and decide you want to use the
hose to "fill a bucket", you'd have to run into the garage to
"enable" the water at a particular "faucet" (bibb); then, back
into the yard to manually open the (mechanical) valve on the
faucet; etc.

Don't you have electric valves already? I.e. 24V solenoid? Typical sprinkler valve work fine with pressurized water. You don't need to open or shut the water source.
 
D

Don Y

Jan 1, 1970
0
Don't you have electric valves already? I.e. 24V solenoid?

Yes. They are upstream from the hose bibbs ("faucets").
They *gate* the flow to the hose bibb.
Typical sprinkler valve work fine with pressurized water. You
don't need to open or shut the water source.

The manual valve ("faucet") is DOWNstream from the electric valve.
It is used to set the *rate* of flow. Including "off", if need be.

Do *you* always use a garden hose with the "faucet" wide open?
Or, do you use the "faucet" to adjust the flow to a rate that is
appropriate for *how* you are *using* the water?

E.g., if I am washing the exterior windows, I don't need the
water to be RUNNING for that entire time. Instead, I turn it
on, wet down the windows, then turn it off while I soap them,
etc. When they have been "washed" (soaped), I turn the water
back on and rinse them clean. When all of the windows are
done, I'll rinse out the soap bucket and then turn the water
supply "off" for good.

In this scenario, the "button" would be pushed exactly twice:
once just before I started (wetting the windows) and once after
I had finished rinsing the bucket.
 
The manual valve ("faucet") is DOWNstream from the electric valve.
It is used to set the *rate* of flow. Including "off", if need be.

Do *you* always use a garden hose with the "faucet" wide open?
Or, do you use the "faucet" to adjust the flow to a rate that is
appropriate for *how* you are *using* the water?

There should only be one valve.

If you build the system properly, it will save lots of walking/running backand forth. But you need something better than the dumb sprinkler controller in most garage.

At the risk of disclosing too much information too early, someone we are working with is building an RF controlled electronics faucet. Namely, it canadjust flow, rather than just on and off. That's why they need more intelligent controller at the source (garage), but more convenient remote (hand-held) at the usage site (lawn and yard).
 
D

Don Y

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi SPehro,

On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 12:31:25 -0700, the renowned Don Y

In any scenario, if the button fails, I lose the ability to signal for
water -- this is an acceptable loss.
I figure I can wire a NO button across the valve solenoid (either
directly or with some series resistance). Then, on the driving
side, sense this "short" when the solenoid is NOT energized (i.e.,
please turn ON the valve) as well as when it *is* energized (i.e.,
please turn OFF the valve).

[Similarly, I could add a NC button in series and "probe" the
load when off vs. on]

The NC in series seems very straightforward. Just put 0.1mA or
something like that through the loop and detect an open circuit. Add a
time-out for instant indication of a broken switch or wire. No problem
with different types of solenoids.

I'm leary of that approach as the button is now a reliability issue.
If the button fails, then the function associated with the button
should be the only thing that I "lose" (i.e., not being able to
call for water on/off).

If the button fails open, I can never activate the valve. Nor can
I see if the valve is even present (vs. an opened coil, etc.).
I.e., the "circuit" requires immediate attention.
The parallel version seems troublesome what with the possibility of
pushing the switch when the solenoid is energized and and the
relatively low resistance of the solenoid coil. You could probably do
something cute taking advantage of the inductance of the coil, but do
you want a project or a quick solution?

I figure all I need to do is cause a "noticeable" increase in
current drawn while the button is depressed. Then, be able to
tell that the draw has increased (beyond what it was, previously)
or is "at" some particular level (though this doesn't have to
be precise).

If the button fails open, I can still actuate the valve, detect the
valve as present (not an opened coil, etc.). I can NOT detect that
the button is broken, though!

If the button fails closed, I can also continue to actuate the valve,
detect an open coil, etc. I just waste more power in the process.
And, I can be reasonably certain that an "always pressed" button is
probably a defective button and not a user standing outside for "12"
hours with his finger holding the button down! :> I.e., the circuit
remains functional but degraded.

Trick is ensuring the "difference" between no load (open coil),
just button (open coil but button pressed), coil (engaged or
idle) and coil with button are all discernible without having
to adjust for some "future" coil characteristics.

E.g., I think the coil on the master valve is considerably different
than these satellite zones.
 
D

Don Y

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi Edward,

There should only be one valve.

No. You're assuming that one valve also does metering. That
changes the requirements ($$) for the valve -- should the other
15 irrigation valves similarly be proportional actuators? Even
though the individual *loads* they feed are already predetermined
flow rates? Should you "stock" two different replacement valves
because you won't know which type may fail from calcification,
etc.? Will homeowner be able to buy that valve from a local
supplier for $20?

How do you connect hose to this "pipe", then? Look for a hose bibb
that does NOT have a manual valve as part of that assembly? (!)
Or, force that manual valve all the way open and then cut the
knob off so it doesn't look like one was ever present? :>

In our case, *two* valves must be engaged in order to dispense
water: the master valve gates water into the outdoor plumbing
(several manifolds around the yard each with one or more valve
assemblies) while a secondary valve feeds a particular "circuit".

This allows us to keep that outdoor plumbing unpressurized unless
needed. And, ensures any water standing above soil level drains
automatically to avoid frozen pipes (I've added "spitters" to
the "load" side of each valve). Also complies with municipal
code requirements for "backflow prevention" (so water from our
yard isn't ever drawn *into* the municipal water supply).

And, minimizes the chance of a (plastic!) valve failing and
flooding the yard (as has happened to two of our neighbors at
separate times).

Lastly, ensures the water is gated OFF in the absence of power
(each valve can be "manually" opened but that is tedious).
If you build the system properly, it will save lots of walking/running
back and forth.

The only "build" decision that saves walking back and forth is
having a means of calling for control action *at* the point
where you are dispensing water. But, short of *forcing* the
user to carry a "control", the only way to do this is to put
the control in place without relying on the user to have it in
his possession.
But you need something better than the dumb sprinkler controller in
most garage.

Already have "better than" that. :> Yet, with "plain old irrigation
valves". What's missing is a way of accommodating user without
*burdening* him to have a control in his possession any time he
*might* possibly want water (which could be any time he happens
to be outside).

E.g., you can purchase a smartphone interface for your irrigation
controller. But, do you want to have to carry your phone so you
can turn the water on? How do you make water available to the guy
you've hired to paint your house -- give him your phone while you
are away at work? :-/
 
D

Don Y

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi Mike,

On 15/09/2013 20:31, Don Y wrote:
Is your pipework metal or plastic?

For the purpose of your (below) comment, "PVC". Actually,
the line *to* the solenoid valve is PVC while the line
*from* the solenoid (to the hose bibb) is copper (for
mechanical reasons).

[I don't have deep enough pockets to run hundreds of feet of 1"
class L copper *to* the solenoid valves :> And, I won't use
galvanized under *any* conditions! Corrodes too quickly!]
If metal then you can use this as either as ground, or if plastic there
might still be a small conduction path to ground depending on your water
quality.

You'll probably need a second voltage source and monitor current on this
to determine if the button is pressed, keeping your solenoid power
source isolated wrt earth.

Note that there are 4 of these "faucets" that need to be individually
"addressable" (i.e., 4 "demand" buttons as well).

I figured I already have a common and a "drive" signal at each
valve. So, if I can change the load that the driver "sees"
(senses), then I can use this to convey information back to the
driving end of the circuit.

For example:
- wire has been cut (a connection has failed, etc.)
- circuit has been shorted
- solenoid "open" (coil burned out)
- solenoid "shorted"
- solenoid intact, not actuated
- solenoid intact, actuated
- solenoid intact, not actuated, button pressed
- solenoid intact, actuated, button pressed
- etc.
[the last four examples being the nominal cases, of course]

Note that I can't test the button without having a user
present. But, I can *probably* make many assumptions with
little downside risk. E.g., if the button *appears* to be
engaged for more than a handful of seconds, it's probably
*broke* -- people aren't likely to push a button more than
briefly... even if the system appears to be unresponsive,
chances are they won't *lean* on the button indefinitely!

(My design philosophy calls for alerting the user of problems
as soon as you can realistically detect them; especially if
you can do so *before* the user stumbles onto them and is,
thus, inconvenienced!)

Of course, all of this needs to be isolated from my actual
controls (iso-optilators, etc.) to protect them from environmental
conditions and "attack". So, whatever is on the "field" side
of the isolation barrier wants to be robust and "sacrificial".

OTOH, I *do* have "smarts" available and these are terribly
low bandwidth signals.
 
G

Glenn

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi, ....
Or, cleverer solutions?

(I'll have to characterize the valves - and hope any replacements
in the future are similar!)

Thx,
--don

Hi Don

You could use DCC:

DCC (Digital Command Control) - optionally with two-way-communication !

You could use HO-rails, 115/230V wire or coaxial cable to remote control
and power e.g. an antenna rotor - with only two wires.

Acually you could remote control more than 100 antenna rotors - or
locomotives, lights, railroad switches, (hose) solenoids...

DCC is an open standard:
http://www.nmra.org/standards/sandrp/consist.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Command_Control

There are a lot of DIY electronics for DCC:

My MiniDCC© System Block Diagram [uses 16F628 2*16 char LCD display]
http://home.cogeco.ca/~rpaisley4/MyDCC.html

Now:
http://www.minidcc.com/
Before:
MiniDCC© - A Digital Command Control Do-It-Yourself Project!:
http://www3.sympatico.ca/robert.cote/minidcc6.htm
Quote: "...
DCC MiniStation©
....
The MiniStation© has been improved considerably but still uses the same PCB.
The new 16F628 with twice the memory offers a pin for pin drop-in
replacement for the orginal 16F84A. Now you can add 128 speed step,
F1-F4 function control, auto-repeat keystroke and up to 123 step of
combined route/turnout sequencing just by replacing the chip. Assembly
code for the new chip is available free. A pre-programmed 16F628 is also
available. Best of all, there is no price increase for the new chip! See
the menu below for details on how to build your own.
....
DCC MiniBooster©
An efficient and simple to build DCC booster has been designed using the
most recent MosFet integrated chip from National Semiconductor®. A
double-sided PCB prepared by John Zajdler is also available (see Parts
menu). Now you can control up to 4 trains simultaneously, over 120
turnouts and program all your decoders using any one of the 4 NMRA
standards at a fraction of the cost of a commercial unit!
...."

http://web.archive.org/web/20050408160609/http://www3.sympatico.ca/robert.cote/LinkPage1.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20040804072725/http://www3.sympatico.ca/robert.cote/minidcc6.htm

Loco-decoder for Märklin-Digital in DIY
http://home.arcor.de/dr.koenig/digital/ewiking.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/20010802...erve.com/homepages/Phil_Grainger/digitalc.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/20090803162613/http://geocities.com/OzDCC/sources.htm

http://www.dmoz.org/Recreation/Models/Railroad/DCC/

-

"Locomotive" "talk-back":

Recommended Practice RP-9.3.2:
http://www.nmra.org/standards/sandrp/pdf/S-9.3.2_2012_12_10.pdf
(main: http://www.nmra.org/standards/sandrp/consist.html )

/Glenn
 
D

Don Y

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi Glenn,

On 15/09/13 21.31, Don Y wrote:
You could use DCC:

DCC (Digital Command Control) - optionally with two-way-communication !

You could use HO-rails, 115/230V wire or coaxial cable to remote control
and power e.g. an antenna rotor - with only two wires.

Acually you could remote control more than 100 antenna rotors - or
locomotives, lights, railroad switches, (hose) solenoids...

DCC is an open standard:
http://www.nmra.org/standards/sandrp/consist.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Command_Control

Ouch! This seems like overkill for the "one bit" I want to
transmit. :< It also looks like it would require a bit
of "smarts" on the button end of the link.

Note that the button would be located in a rather hostile
environment -- temperature, precipitation, etc. So, I am
hesitant to put much of anything out there beyond the
switch itself (e.g., resistor is probably a safe bet but
a *cap* would have problems holding its value, etc.).

[Even the switch is a bit of a challenge to locate suitable
candidates that are easily mounted (in a chunk of concrete)
and impervious to the elements...]

But, these are excellent references! I will dl/bookmark
them. Thanks! It looks like it might be a practical
alternative if I redesign the controls to reside *at* the
valves. I think the best scheme is a set of *tiny* valves
and controls that can be deployed at individual plants
from a single "water bus" -- instead of creating a small
number of "water circuits"/zones that feed a large number
of plants concurrently. This could also open the door for
"local sensing" whereby the individual needs of the plants
could be monitored.

(all these "tiny valves" would still have to communicate with
some central "supervisor" to ensure they don't overdraw the
available water supply -- as well as telling them what criteria
they should operate under)

--don
 
J

Jasen Betts

Jan 1, 1970
0
I'd like to be able to *manually* signal the irrigation
system that I would like the electric valve engaged (and,
later, possibly disengaged!). But, I don't really have a
spare conductor to dedicate to that purpose. :<

you've atcually got one, it's called "ground"
So, I figure I could *share* the "solenoid drive" function with
the "button sense" function.

yeah, that'd work too.
(remember, this is outdoors in the weather so I'm not keen on
putting any electronics out there that won't appreciate the
heat, cold, water, sun, etc.)

diodes are fairly rugged
I figure I can wire a NO button across the valve solenoid (either
directly or with some series resistance). Then, on the driving
side, sense this "short" when the solenoid is NOT energized (i.e.,
please turn ON the valve) as well as when it *is* energized (i.e.,
please turn OFF the valve).
etc.

sounds tricky.
[Similarly, I could add a NC button in series and "probe" the
load when off vs. on]

that one's probably slightly easier.
Any suggestions as to other issues that would make one of these
approaches better/worse than the other? Off hand, the NC in
series seems like it would be more troublesome (i.e., if the
button failed, the valve is not usable).

only if it fails open, if it fails closed...
Or, cleverer solutions?

(I'll have to characterize the valves - and hope any replacements
in the future are similar!)

have you seen that video where that guy wires three switches and three
lamps in series...
 
J

Jasen Betts

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi Edward,
How do you connect hose to this "pipe", then? Look for a hose bibb
that does NOT have a manual valve as part of that assembly? (!)

That's called a "hose union", a fairly common plumbing fitting, probably
even more common in domestic irrigation.
E.g., you can purchase a smartphone interface for your irrigation
controller. But, do you want to have to carry your phone so you
can turn the water on? How do you make water available to the guy
you've hired to paint your house -- give him your phone while you
are away at work? :-/

that one's too easy.
 
D

Don Y

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi Jasen,

That's called a "hose union", a fairly common plumbing fitting, probably
even more common in domestic irrigation.

Hose union is MGH x MGH. I.e., connect two *hoses* together.
More common to find FGH x FGH (to allow the "male" ends of
two hoses to be interconnected -- as the female end of one
of them is probably terminated at a bibb, someplace!)

That would require FGH fitting into which it would mate. More likely
you would sweat a 3/4 FPT adapter and screw a 3/4 MPT x MGH nipple
into it.

[ISTM, you can't find an MGH sweat adapter hence the need for
the FGH fitting. But, I can't imagine a FGH sweat adapter
either! Therefore, the FPT adapter with the MPT x MGH nipple]

When was the last time you saw a MGH connection sticking out of
a wall that *didn't* have a (manual) valve attached to it? :>

(IME, never -- unless it was the male end of a *hose* already
mated to a traditional hose bibb)
 
C

Charlie E.

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi Jasen,

That's called a "hose union", a fairly common plumbing fitting, probably
even more common in domestic irrigation.

Hose union is MGH x MGH. I.e., connect two *hoses* together.
More common to find FGH x FGH (to allow the "male" ends of
two hoses to be interconnected -- as the female end of one
of them is probably terminated at a bibb, someplace!)

That would require FGH fitting into which it would mate. More likely
you would sweat a 3/4 FPT adapter and screw a 3/4 MPT x MGH nipple
into it.

[ISTM, you can't find an MGH sweat adapter hence the need for
the FGH fitting. But, I can't imagine a FGH sweat adapter
either! Therefore, the FPT adapter with the MPT x MGH nipple]

When was the last time you saw a MGH connection sticking out of
a wall that *didn't* have a (manual) valve attached to it? :>

(IME, never -- unless it was the male end of a *hose* already
mated to a traditional hose bibb)

The joys of plumbing!

My hose bib in the back yard started leaking. Got a new washer,
turned off the water, and tried taking it apart. An hour later, I
gave up! Can't get the stem out, looks like lime build up is so thick
that it has made its own washer in there. So, it looks like it is
time to replace the hose bib.

Go into Home Depot, talk to gal there, and she gives me something
called a sharkbite fitting. You just cut off the old sweated on hose
bib and put it on and screw on a new hose bib. Sounds doable.

Next day, turn off water and go to get to work. First, I compare the
new fittings and the existing - not the same size! She gave me a 1/2"
sharkbite, but OD of existing is 1". Turn water back on...

Go back to Home Depot, looking for pipe with OD of 1". She doesn't
know of anything like that. Brings in old guy (my age!) and he thinks
about it, and figures it out. Plumber used 3/4" pipe and a 1/2" hose
bib, but sweated a coupler across both. Coupler would be flush with
stucco wall. So, now I have a torch and plumbing kit, a new 3/4"
sweat to male thread, and a new 3/4" hose bib.

So, now I have a new adventure - learning to sweat pipe! Any hints
and suggestions? Pipe is painted white - do I need to remove paint
first, or just burn it off with torch? How hard is it to sweat off a
coupler like this? Any advice will be appreciated!

Charlie
 
S

Spehro Pefhany

Jan 1, 1970
0
So, now I have a new adventure - learning to sweat pipe! Any hints
and suggestions? Pipe is painted white - do I need to remove paint
first, or just burn it off with torch? How hard is it to sweat off a
coupler like this? Any advice will be appreciated!

Don't burn the house down would be my advice.

Soldering copper pipe is really easy if the parts are fluxed and
bright-clean or already tinned. It's about impossible if they're dirty
or there is a slow drip of water.

The trick I learned to deal with the latter is to stuff a plug of
white bread (no crust) into the pipe. The bread dissolves later.
 
R

rickman

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi Edward,



No. You're assuming that one valve also does metering. That
changes the requirements ($$) for the valve --

I don't get why you have the electric valves. What are they for when
your mechanical valve is right there?

About your proposed approach with a current limited driver for the
solenoids and a button to activate the current limit, I don't get the
problem. The solenoid will draw some current, but it will be for a
considerable time. The button will draw a current for a short time.
The discriminator will be time, not current.

The PSU will not need to limit the current as much as measure it. The
button can have a simple resistor to set the button current draw. If a
current change is seen that lasts for the right amount of time it is
considered a button push. Currents for other time profiles will be
considered the solenoid or a fault. It would even be possible to
implement other commands with other time durations. 0.5 second press
turns on/off this faucet, 3 second press turns off *all* faucets for
example.

What ever you are using for a controller would need to be programmable
at an appropriate level to implement this.
 
D

Don Y

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi Charlie,

The joys of plumbing!

You've been inhaling too many solder fumes, Charlie. As I
recall it, it's _The Joy of *SEX*_! :>
My hose bib in the back yard started leaking. Got a new washer,
turned off the water, and tried taking it apart. An hour later, I
gave up! Can't get the stem out, looks like lime build up is so thick
that it has made its own washer in there. So, it looks like it is
time to replace the hose bib.

Go into Home Depot, talk to gal there, and she gives me something
called a sharkbite fitting. You just cut off the old sweated on hose
bib and put it on and screw on a new hose bib. Sounds doable.

Next day, turn off water and go to get to work. First, I compare the
new fittings and the existing - not the same size! She gave me a 1/2"
sharkbite, but OD of existing is 1". Turn water back on...

Go back to Home Depot, looking for pipe with OD of 1". She doesn't
know of anything like that. Brings in old guy (my age!) and he thinks
about it, and figures it out. Plumber used 3/4" pipe and a 1/2" hose
bib, but sweated a coupler across both. Coupler would be flush with
stucco wall. So, now I have a torch and plumbing kit, a new 3/4"
sweat to male thread, and a new 3/4" hose bib.

So, now I have a new adventure - learning to sweat pipe! Any hints
and suggestions? Pipe is painted white - do I need to remove paint
first, or just burn it off with torch? How hard is it to sweat off a
coupler like this? Any advice will be appreciated!

There are lots of tutorials on-line that will help you with
the details of sweatig a joint (with photos, etc.). So, I'll
only concentrate on the stuff they tend to forget to tell you!

First things first. Some general things to know...

"Plumbing takes THREE trips". By my count, you've only made
*two*! So, plan on (at least) one more! :-/

Don't use a ball valve for a hose bibb or any other "rate
control" valve. A ball valve can only be used as a "stop"
(full on/full off). Operating it in any other position
will lead to erosion (aka valve failure) -- esp with
aggressive water! They are also problematic in that they
can be operated "too quickly" (think: "water hammer") which
can actually cause bits of plumbing and appliances to *fail*
[I suspect you have NOT purchased a ball valve so this shouldn't
apply to you]

Consider using a "boiler drain" instead of a hose bibb.
Most hose bibbs have the operating handle/knob oriented
parallel to the ground *or* at a 45 degree incline therefrom.
As the knob ends up very close to the wall of the house,
operating the knob with your hand ends up scraping your
knuckles against the side of the house. Not a big deal
if your house is clad in cedar shingles. But, a different
experience, entirely, when your knuckles are brushing up
against stucco!

As a rule of thumb, the diameter of the pipe determines
how far the pipe is intended to penetrate into fittings.
E.g., a 3/4" pipe will extend 3/4" into any fitting to
which it is intended to mate. You can skim A LITTLE if
need be (e.g., 5/8" if your pipe is 1/8" too short) but
Code wants this nominal penetration (and I tend to think
the folks who write the Code know more about this stuff
than I *ever* will -- so I just trust them!)

Give yourself room to work. Trying to sweat a joint
through a tiny hole in the wall is just not worth the
effort! Make the hole bigger and plan on fixing it
later. This will also improve your visibility so you
can check your work afterwards.

Have a pliers (I prefer needle nose for the sort of thing
you are doing as they don't have as much of "heat sink"
effect as, for example, gas pliers), wet rag (an old
wash cloth is ideal) and flux brush on hand (along with
solder, of course).

Wrap jaws of pliers with masking/duct tape to prevent them
from marring "finished" surfaces -- esp for softer metals
like the castings used for the hose bibbs, etc. I just
use the "wet rag" that I have on hand -- wrap it around
the fixture I am trying to tighten, then let jaws of pliers
or pipe wrench bite into *that* instead of the metal beneath.

Remove all paint first. Ideally, with solvent taking care
not to get stuff *into* the pipe as that's potable water
elsewhere in your house! (also, avoid having open flame
around when using any solvent -- most like to burn brightly!).
If solvent won't do the trick, emery cloth or steel wool
can be used. Just remember that copper is really soft
and it is easy to remove lots of metal without realizing it!
(you want to try to maintain the nominal O.D. of the pipe
for a good fit with the fitting you'll be attaching).

The sweet spot is located at the tip of the inner blue
flame from the torch. Don't be stingy with the propane
(make sure you have a reasonably sized flame) yet don't be
wasteful, either! Too large a flame can blow itself out!

Heat the *fitting*, not the pipe! Fitting will expand
making it easier to remove from the pipe. When soldering,
this action will serve to draw solder into the gap between
the pipe and the fitting. Apply solder to the gap between
pipe and fitting. You may find it helpful to bend the
last few inches of the ROLLED solder into a 'J' shape
so you can apply it to the "back side" of this fitting
(as you will be "outside" looking in). Solder is a handy
tool for telling if the *old* solder has liquified, yet
(when removing old fitting).

Don't use pliers until the instant before you want to
remove fitting as they will draw LOTS of heat away
from the part and cause heated solder to resolidify.

Things cool off quickly so have everything ready before
you get started. E.g., don't start heating the fitting
and *then* go looking for a pair of pliers. Of course,
"cool off" is entirely relative. You'll find that things
cool down to the point where the solder resolidifies
very quickly! But, seem to take an eternity to cool
to the point where they are safe to touch! :<

When removing an existing fitting, you have to pull
"straight" off as if you get it cocked it will bind and
probably cool off enough to reattach itself in this
new orientation (cuz you probably can't keep the torch on
the fixture *while* you are pulling it off). As soon as the
pliers touch the work, it will begin to RAPIDLY cool!

[You want to avoid putting too much heat into that area
because you risk heating the pipe *behind* it and having
THAT come off in the process. Then you have a bigger task:
replacing a fitting that's even further inside the wall!]

When fitting has been removed, you can EASILY reheat the
end of the pipe to reliquify any remaining solder. This
can be brushed off with the flux brush. Or, wiped off
with the wet rag (but you need to use a very fast motion
as the rag cools the pipe very quickly causing the solder
to resolidify). Emery cloth and/or steel wool will knock
down any fine high spots to allow the new fitting to slide
on.

At least once -- probably several times! -- during this
sort of operation, you will be *sorely* tempted to reach
out with your hand and grab the work. Resist this
temptation. You will yield to it AT MOST *once*. Thereafter,
the sound of melting flesh will be indelibly etched into
your memory -- along with the pain that accompanies it
a few ohnoseconds later!

Oh, and did I mention DON'T TOUCH THE HEATED PART(s)? Or,
put them anywhere that won't appreciate their latent heat??
(e.g., don't have your pets snooping around behind you
while you're working)

----

As for your specific situation...

I'd reconsider the choice of "male adapter" in favor of a
*female* adapter and a male hose bibb (or, boiler drain,
as I suggested) to mate with it.

When your house was originally plumbed, the plumber could
easily access the pipe & fitting from EACH side of the wall!
So, he could position the bibb on the pipe *exactly* where
he wanted it (i.e., so the hose bibb was flush against the
exterior of the house -- even if the exterior wasn't in
place, yet!). Then, sweat the joint and move on...

In your case, you are planning to sweat the male adapter
onto the pipe (once you've removed the coupler that is
there, currently). Then, you are going to screw the (female)
bibb onto this.

But, you there is *one* spot where the bibb will be mated
adequately to the male adapter. You'll have to ensure
the male garden hose (MGH) connection is pointed *down*.
And, that the bibb is screwed on "enough" that the join
between bibb and adapter won't leak (leaks INSIDE walls
are big problems).

So, here's the problem: you are going to solder that
male adapter onto the pipe. This will place the end
of the adapter at some point in space relative to the
outer surface of your house. If too far out, then
you won't be able to snug the hose bibb up against the
house "tight" (bibb probably wants to be fastened to
the house mechanically). If not far enough out, then
the bibb will bottom out against the wall of your house
before the threaded connection is tight enough.

You can try to do a dry run of this by threading the bibb
onto the fitting *before* sweating the fitting onto the
pipe. Then, slide this assembly onto the cleaned end
of the pipe to see where things settle out. If all is
well, you can note the orientation of the male adapter
(i.e., if you rotate it 180 degrees, then the bibb
won't fit the same!) wrt "top" and remove it from the
bibb prior to sweating it onto the pipe.

If you have to cut the pipe to get the assembly to fit
flush against the house, then you'll probably need a
"tight fit" pipe cutter. These are very small -- not
the traditional style that requires several inches of
clearance to "swing around" the pipe. But, they are a real
PITA to use -- esp on larger dia pipes!

If you have to extend the pipe to get the assembly to
fully engage the pipe, then you'll have to lengthen the
pipe. Or, hunt around for a different fixture that might
let you kludge a solution!

[If you have to extend the pipe, make sure you debur the
ends of any new pieces that you *cut* prior to adding
them. Otherwise you can end up with an annoying "whistle"
and, potentially, "pinholing" of the pipe itself as
the turbulence eats away at it. Type L pipe is always
preferable to type M -- heavier.]

When faced with this decision, here, I opted to terminate
each pipe with a *female* adapter. Both male and female
adapters look like large hex nuts. This allows you to
put a backing wrench on the adapter to keep *it* from
rotating (or being torqued!) as you screw the mating
device onto/into it -- with another wrench!

For a hose bibb with a "skirt" that hides the hole in the
wall, you can't access this "nut" while you are screwing
the hose bibb onto the (male) adapter. This puts strain
on the pipe and adapter (big deal! just don't go all
King Kong and you shouldn't have a problem)

With a *female* adapter, I could "set" the adapter into the
wall such that *just* the "nut" portion protruded from the
wall. Then, use a *male* hose bibb that I could screw
into this adapter WHILE HOLDING THE ADAPTER IN PLACE WITH
A BACKING WRENCH.

[As I said, I used boiler drains -- which are inherently
"male" (think "hot water heater drain valve") -- so the
knobs ended up parallel to the house instead of inclined
into it (or normal to it!)]

No idea what sort of mechanical issues you will face. A
"hose connection" (bibb, boiler drain, etc.) sees a fair
bit of mechanical stress so you want to be sure the pipe
and "faucet" are supported well. In my case, this is
set in concrete so it's not going anywhere. If you
are dealing with stucco over wood framing, you may want
to look at the more conventional bibbs as they have a
means of mounting the "skirt" to the structure of the
house.

As with most projects, if you get tired/frustrated, stop
and tackle it later when you've a clearer head. You
don't want to burn the house down because you were sloppy!
Or, melt some wires in the wall, etc.

Most important piece of information: plan on doing this
early in the day (but AFTER your main water needs have
been satisfied) so you can make one (or three) trips to
the store before darkness sets in! (or the stores close)

I'll try to find a photo of what I did to give you an idea.

And, of course, you can always *ask* for clarification! :>
(I use lots of words in the hope of being clear -- yet seem
to always take something for granted that leaves others
confused :< )

--don
 
D

Don Y

Jan 1, 1970
0
On 9/16/2013 12:39 AM, Don Y wrote:

I don't get why you have the electric valves. What are they for when
your mechanical valve is right there?

All of the plantings in the yard have "drip" irrigation available
at each rootball. The size of the rootball varies with the age
of the planting. E.g., a freshly plated tree might have a rootball
12" dia. A *mature* tree wants to be watered farther out from the
trunk (watering at the trunk is a bad idea as it weakens the tree's
support in the ground and the water isn't taken up into the plant,
effectively). E.g., a tree with a 20 ft crown wants to be watered
~6-8 ft away from the trunk.

So, you make a new planting and now have to ensure it gets watered.
Where do you locate the "emitters"? A few inches from the "trunk"
so the water will seep into the gound where it can be accessed
by the roots in that 12" dia rootball? Or, several *feet* away
in anticipation of where the roots will *ultimately* be located?
If you choose the former, then you will have to move the emitters
farther out as the plant matures. If you choose the latter, the
plant will die from dehydration before it's roots ever reach
the locations of the emitters!

[I am not keen about doing the same thing twice, needlessly.
Esp if that thing involves digging in the yard! :> ]

My solution is to have "adjustable" emitters -- in the form
of garden hoses that can be placed *exactly* where a new
planting can get at it's water supply. And, a "flow control"
(manual valve) that ensures the water doesn't drown the
plant each time the faucet is opened!

In use: run the end of a garden hose to a spot near the base
of a new planting; manually adjust the flow rate to something
that "looks about right"; tell the irrigation controller to
actuate the valve associated with that garden hose for X minutes
every day (for the first weeks) then Y minutes every *other* day
(for the next week) then Z minutes... And, each week, move the
hose a bit farther away from the "trunk" as the root systems
grow outward.

Once the root systems are established enough that the "final"
emitter placement can satisfy their needs, roll the hose up
and cancel the "program" for that "zone" on the controller.

E.g., we lost three citrus trees last year (or the year before...
I forget). The citrus trees are fed water at a high flow rate
(because they *use* a lot of water!). You don't want "standing
water" against the trunk of a citrus tree because it leads to
gumiosis (sp?). So, the "emitters" ("shrubblers", in this case)
are located a few feet away from the trunk. They fill a "mote"
that surrounds each tree. This is filled to a depth of about 3",
allowed to seep into the soil, refilled, allowed to seep, and
refilled (again). This ensures adequate water for good fruit
development as well as helping to flush the salts present in the
water and soil down *below* the roots.

The *four* (i.e., one of which has no "previous location" that it
can occupy) new plantings are tiny: "1 gallon" pots (about 6" dia).
So, the root systems haven't a chance in hell of ever reaching
that "mote" located several feet away from the trunk! Solution:
run garden hose to each new planting and let the hose provide the
water needs until the plant is "established".

Similarly, if you discover a plant is NOT getting watered
enough, you can hack together a kludge to provide supplemental
water to *just* that plant -- without providing EXTRA water to
all of the other plants fed by that irrigation "zone". Then,
when you have the time to do so, you can replace the emitters
on that particular plant with something having a larger flow rate
(which gives *that* plant more water per unit time without
affecting the water supplied to the other plants on that zone)
About your proposed approach with a current limited driver for the
solenoids and a button to activate the current limit, I don't get the
problem. The solenoid will draw some current, but it will be for a
considerable time. The button will draw a current for a short time. The
discriminator will be time, not current.

The current limiter is to prevent a shorted coil from pulling down
the power supply and crippling the other valves in the system.
I.e., solenoid should draw 0.3A inrush, 0.2A holding. If it ever
draws 0.5A then something is broken! If it tries to draw many
*amps*, something is SHORTED!

You don't want to have to replace a drive transistor because it
tried to pass the full output current available through a short.
Nor do you want to add fuses.

Instead, let the supply go into limit. That protects the output
driver as well as ensuring that one driver doesn't render the
entire output system unusable (because you may want to operate
several valves concurrently and don't want valve 1 to pull down Vcc
to a point where valve 13 won't actuate!)
The PSU will not need to limit the current as much as measure it. The

It has to do both -- but, how finely it measures is debatable.
All it has to do is be able to differentiate among different
types of load conditions (shorted coil, opened coil, button
pressed, button pressed while coil energized, coil shorted
to ANOTHER coil, etc.)
button can have a simple resistor to set the button current draw. If a
current change is seen that lasts for the right amount of time it is
considered a button push. Currents for other time profiles will be
considered the solenoid or a fault. It would even be possible to
implement other commands with other time durations. 0.5 second press
turns on/off this faucet, 3 second press turns off *all* faucets for
example.

What ever you are using for a controller would need to be programmable
at an appropriate level to implement this.

That's the easy part. Tough part is getting the information I need
across the isolation barrier without using anything precious or
"fragile" on the field side of that barrier (cuz you have to expect
a very hostile environment, there).
 
Top