Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Flourescent lamps and control circuits

R

Richard

Jan 1, 1970
0
I'm not an engineer.

I'm trying to establish how compact the control gear can be for a certain
flourescent lamp.

If I buy a regular energy saving lamp (say a 11W CFL) to replace a regular
incadescent lamp, the electronic control is built into the lamp and it's
obviously very compact because it's in with the lamp itself. Also cheap to
produce. A lamp like:

http://www.lightbulbs-direct.com/product/2523/plet-economy-energy-saver-11w-es/

Now lets say I want to replace my energy saving CFL lamp with a four foot
regular tube flourescent. Right now I'm thinking that I have to buy an
expensive, and quite large ballast to run that kind of lamp. I'm not certain
though about that.

The thing is I've been looking at some PL-L CFLs, like:

http://www.lightbulbs-direct.com/product/1523/pl-l-low-energy-24w-827-extra-warm-white-2g11-4-pin/

I think this CFL is a single tube lamp. A simple tube flourescent bent back
into itself. So, I think I have no option to buy an expensive and quite
large conventional or electronic ballast for this lamp, because it's
essentially a tube flourescent. Like:

http://laukgroup.com/acatalog/Philips_HF-PERFORMER_II_PL-L_6370030.html

But, I wish I could buy contol gear that was inexpensive and compact. Not
unlike the control gear in the regular energy saving CFL you buy to replace
your regular incadescent lamp.

Is the control gear I'm wanting out there and I've not spotted it yet, or
what?

Comments appreciated. Thanks.
 
A

Andrew Gabriel

Jan 1, 1970
0
I'm not an engineer.

I'm trying to establish how compact the control gear can be for a certain
flourescent lamp.

If I buy a regular energy saving lamp (say a 11W CFL) to replace a regular
incadescent lamp, the electronic control is built into the lamp and it's
obviously very compact because it's in with the lamp itself. Also cheap to
produce. A lamp like:

http://www.lightbulbs-direct.com/product/2523/plet-economy-energy-saver-11w-es/

Now lets say I want to replace my energy saving CFL lamp with a four foot
regular tube flourescent. Right now I'm thinking that I have to buy an
expensive, and quite large ballast to run that kind of lamp. I'm not certain
though about that.

The thing is I've been looking at some PL-L CFLs, like:

http://www.lightbulbs-direct.com/product/1523/pl-l-low-energy-24w-827-extra-warm-white-2g11-4-pin/

I think this CFL is a single tube lamp. A simple tube flourescent bent back
into itself. So, I think I have no option to buy an expensive and quite
large conventional or electronic ballast for this lamp, because it's
essentially a tube flourescent. Like:

http://laukgroup.com/acatalog/Philips_HF-PERFORMER_II_PL-L_6370030.html

But, I wish I could buy contol gear that was inexpensive and compact. Not
unlike the control gear in the regular energy saving CFL you buy to replace
your regular incadescent lamp.

Is the control gear I'm wanting out there and I've not spotted it yet, or
what?

See: http://www.cucumber.demon.co.uk/lights/diy/
and: http://www.cucumber.demon.co.uk/lights/diy2/

The Philips Matchbox ballasts are the smallest I know
of (apparently, sold as Advance Matchbox in the US).
This is what I used in that last link. There are 3 or
4 different power ranges available, covering 4W - 24W.
They are each available in two case shapes or just the
bare boards (again, the two shapes). They also come as
instant start (blue label) or preheat (red label), but
both types require use of preheat (4-pin) tubes.
 
R

Richard

Jan 1, 1970
0
Andrew Gabriel said:


Lets imagine that I want to run the following CFL (I think it's a CFL):

http://www.lightbulbs-direct.com/product/1523/pl-l-low-energy-24w-827-extra-warm-white-2g11-4-pin/

I'm not sure, but I think this would be roughly equivalent to a T5 24W 640mm
long tube flourescent.

What you did was take the control gear from a 11W CFL, and used it to drive
a 13W T5 tube.

Are we saying then, that I can take the control gear from a 23W CFL, and use
it to drive a 24W PL-L lamp like the one in the link?

But if that were the case, why can you not buy this space-saving and
economical control gear instead of the expensive control gear? Or can you?
 
A

Andrew Gabriel

Jan 1, 1970
0
Lets imagine that I want to run the following CFL (I think it's a CFL):

http://www.lightbulbs-direct.com/product/1523/pl-l-low-energy-24w-827-extra-warm-white-2g11-4-pin/

I'm not sure, but I think this would be roughly equivalent to a T5 24W 640mm
long tube flourescent.

What you did was take the control gear from a 11W CFL, and used it to drive
a 13W T5 tube.

Are we saying then, that I can take the control gear from a 23W CFL, and use
it to drive a 24W PL-L lamp like the one in the link?

You can certainly try it. Check it with a true power meter to
see what the power consumption actually is. Best results would
be from ballast from a CFL with similar diameter tube.
But if that were the case, why can you not buy this space-saving and
economical control gear instead of the expensive control gear? Or can you?

http://uk.rs-online.com/web/search/searchBrowseAction.html?method=searchProducts&searchTerm=HFM+124

Don't expect same price as in intergral ballast CFL - the volumes
of production and scale of distribution and market competition
aren't the same.
 
R

Richard

Jan 1, 1970
0
Richard said:
Lets imagine that I want to run the following CFL (I think it's a CFL):

http://www.lightbulbs-direct.com/product/1523/pl-l-low-energy-24w-827-extra-warm-white-2g11-4-pin/

I'm not sure, but I think this would be roughly equivalent to a T5 24W
640mm
long tube flourescent.

What you did was take the control gear from a 11W CFL, and used it to
drive
a 13W T5 tube.

Are we saying then, that I can take the control gear from a 23W CFL, and
use
it to drive a 24W PL-L lamp like the one in the link?

But if that were the case, why can you not buy this space-saving and
economical control gear instead of the expensive control gear? Or can you?

Some questions:

Is there a distinction regarding control gear, between Flourescent Tube
Lamps (FLTs) and Compact Florescent Lamps (CFLs)?

Is the 24W PL-L lamp in the link a CFL or FTL?

What does PL-L stand for?

If the 24W PL-L lamp in the limk is a FTL what is it roughly equivalent to?

Thanks.

Some commercial control gear:

http://ntlelectronics.com/electronic_control_gears_for_ftl_cfl.html

http://ntlelectronics.com/electronic_ballast_circuits_for_retrofit_cfl.html
 
R

Richard

Jan 1, 1970
0
To answer most of my questions:
Is there a distinction regarding control gear, between Flourescent Tube
Lamps (FLTs) and Compact Florescent Lamps (CFLs)?

Probably. :c) Actually, as one says difference in gear between these two
have to do with production volumes and reliability and special features.
Gear for CFLs are probably less reliable, and fewer feature, but cost
sayings due to production volumes. Maybe I dsuppose some some techical
deffrences between CFLs and FTLs, but maybe this is not the main reason for
the differences in commercial control gear. My guess.
Is the 24W PL-L lamp in the link a CFL or FTL?

It's officially a CFL I'm sure. But basically also a FTL.
What does PL-L stand for?

I think its basically Philips- Long

Like PL-C is Philips- Cluster
If the 24W PL-L lamp in the link is a FTL what is it roughly equivalent
to?

My guess is that although it may be classified as a CFL, it's roughly
equivalent to a 24W T5 640mm long. Could be run with regular FTL control
gear or CFL control gear. My guess.
 
A

Andrew Gabriel

Jan 1, 1970
0
To answer most of my questions:


Probably. :c) Actually, as one says difference in gear between these two
have to do with production volumes and reliability and special features.
Gear for CFLs are probably less reliable, and fewer feature, but cost
sayings due to production volumes. Maybe I dsuppose some some techical
deffrences between CFLs and FTLs, but maybe this is not the main reason for
the differences in commercial control gear. My guess.


It's officially a CFL I'm sure. But basically also a FTL.

I don't think I've seen a clear definition of what a _compact_
fluorescent tube is (verses a non-compact fluorescent tube).
Originally, I suspect it implied small tubes with higher
surface luminous emittance of the tube than traditional tubes
had had, but subsequent increasing power ratings mean they
aren't necessarily small anymore.

So you might say it's a tube with a surface luminous emittance
above the values of old traditional tubes. As a consequence, it's
probably also tubes with a higher operating temperature than
the 40C of traditional tubes, and hence the more noticable
run-up time to get to the designed operating temperature
(often around 100C), mercury vapour pressure, and light output.
I think its basically Philips- Long

Like PL-C is Philips- Cluster


My guess is that although it may be classified as a CFL, it's roughly
equivalent to a 24W T5 640mm long. Could be run with regular FTL control
gear or CFL control gear. My guess.

It's almost certainly a CFL. The ballast sets the tube current.
The tube's design current is quite dependent on the tube diameter,
which is why I said if you are going to reuse control gear, aim for
something with the same tube diameter (and similar power rating).
 
D

Don Klipstein

Jan 1, 1970
0
Lets imagine that I want to run the following CFL (I think it's a CFL):

http://www.lightbulbs-direct.com/product/1523/pl-l-low-energy-24w-827-extra-warm-white-2g11-4-pin/

I'm not sure, but I think this would be roughly equivalent to a T5 24W 640mm
long tube flourescent.

What you did was take the control gear from a 11W CFL, and used it to drive
a 13W T5 tube.

Are we saying then, that I can take the control gear from a 23W CFL, and use
it to drive a 24W PL-L lamp like the one in the link?

But if that were the case, why can you not buy this space-saving and
economical control gear instead of the expensive control gear? Or can you?

A CFL and PL-L lamp may have different current requirements.

The CFL ballast probably has a lower life expectancy.

The CFL ballast may not survive end-of-life of the lamp or open circuit
operation.

- Don Klipstein ([email protected])
 
R

Richard

Jan 1, 1970
0
A CFL and PL-L lamp may have different current requirements.

The CFL ballast probably has a lower life expectancy.

The CFL ballast may not survive end-of-life of the lamp or open circuit
operation.

- Don Klipstein ([email protected])

PL-L means Philip Long.

PL-L is designated a CFL I believe.

You can have a CFL with integrated ballast or not.

Although the PL-L is a CFL, I think it's esssentailly just a FTL, really
just a linear tube flourescent bent back on itself.

PL-L with integrated ballast has a CFL ballast with the design limitations
you mention. Also inexpensice.

PL-L with an outboard balance will use a much more expensive ballast
incorporating more features.

That is not to say that you could not use a CFL ballast ouboard of the PL-L.
You can.

That's what I think.
 
R

Richard

Jan 1, 1970
0
Richard said:
PL-L means Philip Long.

PL-L is designated a CFL I believe.

You can have a CFL with integrated ballast or not.

Although the PL-L is a CFL, I think it's esssentailly just a FTL, really
just a linear tube flourescent bent back on itself.

PL-L with integrated ballast has a CFL ballast with the design limitations
you mention. Also inexpensice.

PL-L with an outboard balance will use a much more expensive ballast
incorporating more features.

That is not to say that you could not use a CFL ballast ouboard of the
PL-L. You can.

That's what I think.

My problem of sorts, is that non of the Philips PL-L and all those similar
lamps like GE BIAX and OSRAM DULUXE L, to my knowlege, incorporate an
integrated ballast. So, one is forced to use a relatively expensive outboard
ballast, unless you can source inexpensive ones. Or alternively use an
inexpensive ballast circuit as found in many other CFL lamps. Which you make
yourself, reclaim from old CFLs or buy. Realising of course the limitations
in features.
 
R

Richard

Jan 1, 1970
0
Victor Roberts said:
In addition to higher volume, integrated ballasts (control
gear on your side of the pond) are less expensive than
stand-alone ballasts because they have no protection against
burning out when the lamp fails (it is not necessary in an
integrated design), are generally designed for shorter life
and generally have low power factor, while most stand-alone
ballasts are high power factor.

As has been stated by others, in order to use a ballast
designed for one lamp on another you need to match not only
the power rating but the current rating. There are some
integrated, or screw-base. CFL's that use exactly the same
"wire lamp" as the equivalent pin-base version. In these
cases you can use the ballasts from the integrated CFL with
the matching pin-base CFL. But you should be aware that the
ballast WILL burn out when the lamp dies or even if the lamp
is disconnected, so I think this is poor economy.

Actually, I feel I have discovered that there is technically no problem in
using integrated ballast type circuits with PL-L type lamps which don't have
integrated ballasts. I did not know that at first. I thought maybe you had
to use relatively expensive stand alone ballasts with the PL-L type. It was
not really my intention to re-use an integrated ballast taken from a dud
CFL. I'd buy one I think, or get a suitable circuit off the web. Of course,
othe deficiencies of integrated ballasts noted. So, as you say using
integrated ballast circuit on a PL-L type lamp could be a poor decision.
 
D

Don Klipstein

Jan 1, 1970
0
PL-L means Philip Long.

PL-L is designated a CFL I believe.

You can have a CFL with integrated ballast or not.

Although the PL-L is a CFL, I think it's esssentailly just a FTL, really
just a linear tube flourescent bent back on itself.

PL-L with integrated ballast has a CFL ballast with the design limitations
you mention. Also inexpensice.

Should your CFL ballast actually be one made for an integral ballast
PL-L, then it should be OK in terms of output current. I was thinking
of a different form of CFL, since all 23 watt integral ballast CFLs that I
have seen had smaller diameter tubing than PL-L lamps.

The other design limitations remain.
PL-L with an outboard balance will use a much more expensive ballast
incorporating more features.

That is not to say that you could not use a CFL ballast ouboard of the PL-L.
You can.

That's what I think.

- Don Klipstein ([email protected])
 
A

Andrew Gabriel

Jan 1, 1970
0
As has been stated by others, in order to use a ballast
designed for one lamp on another you need to match not only
the power rating but the current rating. There are some
integrated, or screw-base. CFL's that use exactly the same
"wire lamp" as the equivalent pin-base version. In these
cases you can use the ballasts from the integrated CFL with
the matching pin-base CFL. But you should be aware that the
ballast WILL burn out when the lamp dies or even if the lamp
is disconnected, so I think this is poor economy.

I have to say, I've never yet found an integral ballast
which has been damaged by the tube failing, either the
original tube or subsequent refits. The control gear I
reused from Philips PL 9W lamps in the article on my
webpage have probably all had about 2 further lamp changes
since I did them (they're in a kitchen and used a lot of
the time). The only problem I had was electrolytic capacitor
failure, which was trivial to fix.
 
Top