Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Convert waveform formula to 'usual' cos sin formula to sketch graph

Ian Wright

Nov 21, 2017
6
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
6
Hi.
I am used to drawing cos sin waves graphs from formulas that look like:

Y = A cos (B (x-c) ) + D
where A = amplitude, B = Period (2pie / B), C= Horizontal Phase Shift, D=Vertical Shift.

But I have the formula Vt = 10cos (650t + 0.0015) and cannot understand how it relates to the formula's I am used to? Does anyone have any ideas of where I get the period and phase shifts from it?
Many Thanks
 

Harald Kapp

Moderator
Moderator
Nov 17, 2011
13,719
Joined
Nov 17, 2011
Messages
13,719
I am used to drawing cos sin waves graphs from formulas that look like:
Maybe look like but are the same as. Have a closer look at this equation:

Y = A cos (B (x-c) ) + D
This should be
Y = A cos (B*x-c) ) + D as the phase shift c is fixed and not time variable. The time variable part would be the frequency (or equivalent to the inverse of the period).
Then the correspondence is obvious.

B = Period (2pie / B)
This makes no sense as B = 2*Pi/B means B is fixed at B = sqrt(2*Pi). The period of a sine is defined as 1/f where f is the frequency in Hz.
 

dorke

Jun 20, 2015
2,342
Joined
Jun 20, 2015
Messages
2,342
This may help you (from wiki):

sine.jpg

There is no "D=Vertical Shift" here,but it can be easily added if needed.
We call it the "DC part", i.e zero frequency part.
 

Ratch

Mar 10, 2013
1,099
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
1,099
Hi.
I am used to drawing cos sin waves graphs from formulas that look like:

Y = A cos (B (x-c) ) + D
where A = amplitude, B = Period (2pie / B), C= Horizontal Phase Shift, D=Vertical Shift.

But I have the formula Vt = 10cos (650t + 0.0015) and cannot understand how it relates to the formula's I am used to? Does anyone have any ideas of where I get the period and phase shifts from it?
Many Thanks
I don't see what the problem is. Simply convert the coefficient 650 into a frequency as shown below.
Wright1.JPG
Below is plot of the original equation.
Wright2.JPG
And, it matches with the revised equation.
Wright3.JPG
Ask if you have any questions.

Ratch
 

Ratch

Mar 10, 2013
1,099
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
1,099
Have a close look at the way the parentheses are set. The equation as posted by the op makes not much sense.
True, it is a clunky, clumsy way to present a simple trig equation. But, I was trying to show him how to find the frequency and period of the second equation involving the 650 times "t" term. I let him figure out how to simplify the phase change term of 10.

Ratch
 
Top