Actual experiences mod'ing laptop bricks?

Discussion in 'Electronic Design' started by Don Y, Jan 8, 2014.

  1. Don Y

    Don Y Guest

    Hi,

    I've got a ~200W laptop brick on which I'd like to tweek the
    output voltage (~5% -- 19.5V down to 18.5V). Anyone know what
    sort of margins they design into these? I'm not keen on risking
    the laptop for the sake of a $10 power supply... (i.e., "it
    *should* work" is not an acceptable reply :> )

    Thx,
    --don
     
    Don Y, Jan 8, 2014
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Don Y

    mike Guest

    On 1/7/2014 5:01 PM, Don Y wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I've got a ~200W laptop brick on which I'd like to tweek the
    > output voltage (~5% -- 19.5V down to 18.5V). Anyone know what
    > sort of margins they design into these? I'm not keen on risking
    > the laptop for the sake of a $10 power supply... (i.e., "it
    > *should* work" is not an acceptable reply :> )
    >
    > Thx,
    > --don

    I use laptop power supplies for all kinds of stuff.
    Just change the sense resistor value.
    Changing 5% shouldn't be a problem.
    But the answer to your concern is in the risk/reward ratio.
    If you can get the right one for $10 and your laptop
    is worth much more than $10, it's a no-brainer.

    You might get better help if you listed more detail
    on what/why you're doing it?
    At that power level, there might be negotiation between
    the laptop and the brick.
    I've seen some power supply interface designs that I'd
    classify as stupid.

    My experience with sourcing custom OEM power supplies is
    that they're like everybody else...half of them
    are below average. And average ain't nearly good enough.
    So asking them ain't gonna be helpful either.
     
    mike, Jan 8, 2014
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Don Y

    Don Y Guest

    Hi Mike,

    On 1/7/2014 6:57 PM, mike wrote:
    > On 1/7/2014 5:01 PM, Don Y wrote:
    >
    >> I've got a ~200W laptop brick on which I'd like to tweek the
    >> output voltage (~5% -- 19.5V down to 18.5V). Anyone know what
    >> sort of margins they design into these? I'm not keen on risking
    >> the laptop for the sake of a $10 power supply... (i.e., "it
    >> *should* work" is not an acceptable reply :> )


    > I use laptop power supplies for all kinds of stuff.
    > Just change the sense resistor value.
    > Changing 5% shouldn't be a problem.


    That was my plan -- but, I'm concerned with the downside
    risk (derating plus any "smarts" in the power supply that
    might be "confused" because they are unaware of this change)

    > But the answer to your concern is in the risk/reward ratio.
    > If you can get the right one for $10 and your laptop
    > is worth much more than $10, it's a no-brainer.


    Not my laptop. These are laptops that were donated (without
    power supplies... sheesh!), will be "refurbished" and "gifted"
    to disadvantaged kids. (I.e., the sorts of folks who can least
    afford to bear the consequences for a bad decision on my part!)

    I can get my hands on a supply of these larger 200W supplies
    (virtually) "free" but am hesitant to *use* them "as is"
    (not knowing how tolerant the laptop is of variations in input
    voltage *above* spec). So, it's basically just my (donated)
    time to make the changes.

    OTOH, if I have to purchase power supplies (even "used"), they're
    in the $20+ range, each. (assuming I can find a single source
    at that price!)

    > You might get better help if you listed more detail
    > on what/why you're doing it?


    See above.

    > At that power level, there might be negotiation between
    > the laptop and the brick.


    Exactly. And, I'm sure any "smarts" therein won't take into
    account an *observation* of any component changes that have been
    made "post production" :<

    I know some of these power supplies refuse to work on "competitor's"
    products (despite having the same V+I characteristics)

    > I've seen some power supply interface designs that I'd
    > classify as stupid.
    >
    > My experience with sourcing custom OEM power supplies is
    > that they're like everybody else...half of them
    > are below average. And average ain't nearly good enough.
    > So asking them ain't gonna be helpful either.


    This is one reason why I want to avoid the "off brand"
    replacement products. So, I'm stuck with either "name brand"
    *new*... or *used*.
     
    Don Y, Jan 8, 2014
    #3
  4. Don Y

    dp Guest

    On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 3:01:53 AM UTC+2, Don Y wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I've got a ~200W laptop brick on which I'd like to tweek the
    > output voltage (~5% -- 19.5V down to 18.5V). Anyone know what
    > sort of margins they design into these? I'm not keen on risking
    > the laptop for the sake of a $10 power supply... (i.e., "it
    > *should* work" is not an acceptable reply :> )
    >
    > Thx,
    > --don


    Hi Don,
    some years ago I tried this on a small 15V (IIRC) adaptor. It was
    somewhat smaller, not an ordinary laptop one but I got it because
    it stated its output was settable. It was not so I opened it hoping
    to find the feedback divider and change it (it was a cheap DX box).
    Turned out the designer had been pretty good and had done things
    not that obvious without having the circuit. The feedback was somewhat
    hard to modify, a "zener" (TL431) serially feeding current into
    the feedback optocoupler - and there was more to it than that
    which would have taken hours to understand so I just abandoned
    the idea (got another brick).
    I suppose there are many different designs out there and most of
    them likely (the one I abandoned unchanged included) allow a small change
    like the one you need but I think your only reasonable option is
    to open the thing and see for yourself. May be you'll know what to
    do within a few minutes, may be you'll give it up as impractical.
    Opening may not necessarily be easy; recently I had to cut the
    plastic of my laptops brick in order to open it to fix the outgoing
    cable....

    Dimiter

    ------------------------------------------------------
    Dimiter Popoff, TGI http://www.tgi-sci.com
    ------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/didi_tgi/sets/72157600228621276/
     
    dp, Jan 8, 2014
    #4
  5. Don Y

    Don Y Guest

    Hi Dimiter,

    Happy New Year!

    On 1/7/2014 7:48 PM, dp wrote:
    > On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 3:01:53 AM UTC+2, Don Y wrote:
    >
    >> I've got a ~200W laptop brick on which I'd like to tweek the
    >> output voltage (~5% -- 19.5V down to 18.5V). Anyone know what
    >> sort of margins they design into these? I'm not keen on risking
    >> the laptop for the sake of a $10 power supply... (i.e., "it
    >> *should* work" is not an acceptable reply :> )

    >
    > some years ago I tried this on a small 15V (IIRC) adaptor. It was
    > somewhat smaller, not an ordinary laptop one but I got it because
    > it stated its output was settable. It was not so I opened it hoping
    > to find the feedback divider and change it (it was a cheap DX box).
    > Turned out the designer had been pretty good and had done things
    > not that obvious without having the circuit. The feedback was somewhat
    > hard to modify, a "zener" (TL431) serially feeding current into
    > the feedback optocoupler - and there was more to it than that
    > which would have taken hours to understand so I just abandoned
    > the idea (got another brick).


    The adapter is rather large -- probably 20+ cu in. Hopefully, not
    as cramped as some of the tinier beasts out there.

    And, as it's so large (power), I suspect (?) it may be a bit
    better designed than the "500mA disposables".

    > I suppose there are many different designs out there and most of
    > them likely (the one I abandoned unchanged included) allow a small change
    > like the one you need but I think your only reasonable option is
    > to open the thing and see for yourself. May be you'll know what to
    > do within a few minutes, may be you'll give it up as impractical.
    > Opening may not necessarily be easy; recently I had to cut the
    > plastic of my laptops brick in order to open it to fix the outgoing
    > cable....


    My main concern is no knowledge of the information that is exchanged
    (one way? two way? *interactive*??) between the adapter and the
    laptop.

    I.e., at the very least, the laptop will know that this is a "native"
    adapter (same manufacturer) vs. a "foreign" one. Will it know which
    *model* adapter? Will it only be willing to operate with *known*
    models (BIOS update)?

    Will it *command* the adapter to "switch to normal output voltage"
    (perhaps it is initially in a low voltage mode that enables the
    two devices to converse without putting either in jeopardy)?
    Will it query the adapter dynamically to determine current operating
    conditions?

    If there are smarts in the adapter, will it notice that Vout is not
    what it *should* be? Will it try to compensate? etc.

    (once you open the door for smarts *in* the power supply, it no
    longer is a "trivial component")

    I'm not keen on discovering these issues via "smoke signals"!
    (they aren't my laptops to "destroy")

    --don
     
    Don Y, Jan 8, 2014
    #5
  6. Don Y

    dp Guest

    On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 6:35:52 AM UTC+2, Don Y wrote:
    > Hi Dimiter,
    >
    > Happy New Year!
    >
    > On 1/7/2014 7:48 PM, dp wrote:
    > > On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 3:01:53 AM UTC+2, Don Y wrote:

    > .....
    > ....
    >
    > My main concern is no knowledge of the information that is exchanged
    > (one way? two way? *interactive*??) between the adapter and the
    > laptop.


    I have not seen that many laptops but those I have seen don't have
    such a thing, just a plain two wire connection. These I have opened
    have been far from suggesting the cable could be carrying anything
    else but power. I'd be very surprised to see such a thing.

    >
    > I.e., at the very least, the laptop will know that this is a "native"
    > adapter (same manufacturer) vs. a "foreign" one. Will it know which
    > *model* adapter? Will it only be willing to operate with *known*
    > models (BIOS update)?


    Again, I have not seen this done but then I am far from having seen
    them all... If you dedicate a day's work on opening the laptop
    and investigating (oops, just opening might take you a day...
    I remember opening one for cleaning the air path 1-2 years ago,
    took me hours).
    I have bought 3-4 type of different "laptop chargers" from DX
    (to use on anything but laptops, that is) and none of them had
    any indications of such a thing (and I have opened... let me see,
    I think 4 if not 5 types, one really old, all models would be older
    than say 3 years, may be more).

    Dimiter

    ------------------------------------------------------
    Dimiter Popoff, TGI http://www.tgi-sci.com
    ------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/didi_tgi/sets/72157600228621276/
     
    dp, Jan 8, 2014
    #6
  7. Don Y

    Don Y Guest

    Hi Dimiter,

    On 1/7/2014 10:00 PM, dp wrote:

    >> My main concern is no knowledge of the information that is exchanged
    >> (one way? two way? *interactive*??) between the adapter and the
    >> laptop.

    >
    > I have not seen that many laptops but those I have seen don't have
    > such a thing, just a plain two wire connection. These I have opened
    > have been far from suggesting the cable could be carrying anything
    > else but power. I'd be very surprised to see such a thing.


    These have a third connector that carries *some* sort of a signal.
    E.g., if I take a power supply from HP and try to plug it into a
    Dell laptop (same Vout, Imax, connector dimensions) the Dell laptop
    will complain. Most typically, it will refuse to charge the
    battery (or, will not charge it completely, etc.)

    >> I.e., at the very least, the laptop will know that this is a "native"
    >> adapter (same manufacturer) vs. a "foreign" one. Will it know which
    >> *model* adapter? Will it only be willing to operate with *known*
    >> models (BIOS update)?

    >
    > Again, I have not seen this done but then I am far from having seen
    > them all... If you dedicate a day's work on opening the laptop
    > and investigating (oops, just opening might take you a day...
    > I remember opening one for cleaning the air path 1-2 years ago,
    > took me hours).
    > I have bought 3-4 type of different "laptop chargers" from DX
    > (to use on anything but laptops, that is) and none of them had
    > any indications of such a thing (and I have opened... let me see,
    > I think 4 if not 5 types, one really old, all models would be older
    > than say 3 years, may be more).


    The two conductor power supplies are admittedly dumb. Easy to
    repurpose a power adapter from vendor A for vendor B's equipment
    (as long as V & I are compatible and you can get an appropriate
    connector on the end).

    I've done this many times in the past. E.g., one of our TV's is
    powered by a laptop power supply (because the original power supply
    died).
     
    Don Y, Jan 8, 2014
    #7
  8. Don Y

    Don Y Guest

    On 1/7/2014 10:00 PM, dp wrote:

    > I have bought 3-4 type of different "laptop chargers" from DX
    > (to use on anything but laptops, that is) and none of them had
    > any indications of such a thing (and I have opened... let me see,
    > I think 4 if not 5 types, one really old, all models would be older
    > than say 3 years, may be more).


    Have a look at:

    <http://www.laptop-junction.com/toast/content/inside-dell-ac-power-adapter-mystery-revealed>
     
    Don Y, Jan 8, 2014
    #8
  9. Don Y

    dp Guest

    On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 7:47:53 AM UTC+2, Don Y wrote:
    > On 1/7/2014 10:00 PM, dp wrote:
    >
    > > I have bought 3-4 type of different "laptop chargers" from DX
    > > (to use on anything but laptops, that is) and none of them had
    > > any indications of such a thing (and I have opened... let me see,
    > > I think 4 if not 5 types, one really old, all models would be older
    > > than say 3 years, may be more).

    >
    > Have a look at:
    >
    > <http://www.laptop-junction.com/toast/content/inside-dell-ac-power-adapter-mystery-revealed>


    Oh so some have started to put some I2C eeprom or whatever to make
    people buy exactly their charger. The laptops I have been buying
    are Acer, no such thing. Why should I be surprised really. I think
    I have seen a Sony which did not have that sort of thing either
    but I am not so sure about that.
    If you have one of these laptops with "encrypted" power I don't think
    you have many options but to pay them up (likely around $100 rather
    than $10...).

    One more thing to watch for when buying, one could easily overlook it
    I guess.

    Dimiter
     
    dp, Jan 8, 2014
    #9
  10. Don Y

    Jasen Betts Guest

    On 2014-01-08, Don Y <> wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I've got a ~200W laptop brick on which I'd like to tweek the
    > output voltage (~5% -- 19.5V down to 18.5V). Anyone know what
    > sort of margins they design into these?


    If ~188W output is acceptable at 18.5V tweaking the voltage should be
    possible with no ill effects.
    (in other words same maximum DC output current)

    Typically switchers use a slosed loop matching a (resistive) voltage
    divider off the output against a fixed reference, you just need to
    find the divider and tweak the ratio.

    > I'm not keen on risking
    > the laptop for the sake of a $10 power supply...
    > (i.e., "it *should* work" is not an acceptable reply :> )


    measure it and test it on a dummy load before connecting the laptop.

    --
    For a good time: install ntp

    --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---
     
    Jasen Betts, Jan 8, 2014
    #10
  11. Don Y

    Tim Williams Guest

    I would be surprised if the laptop cared; most are probably good from
    16-25V. Inspecting a few laptop motherboards, it looks like there's a "HV
    / bulk" supply from which all the others are derived; some battery
    management circuitry selects the battery or charger (the adapter of course
    being higher in voltage so a sync buck and battery controller handle the
    actual charging). 14.4V batteries are common (four cells in series, plus
    however many in parallel), and so are 18-19V chargers.

    Of course, if "probably" isn't good enough, trimming resistors will be in
    your future. :)

    Assuming it's a flyback supply, the lower limit will be due to UVLO on the
    probably UC3842 controller, supplied by the aux (line side) winding. Once
    you crack it open, you could probe the controller or the little
    electrolytic in there to see what it runs at, and from there, figure it
    can go as low as the turnoff limit. Any lower and it'll always bob on and
    off, which is obviously bad. But that's probably 30% lower than you need.

    Tim

    --
    Seven Transistor Labs
    Electrical Engineering Consultation
    Website: http://seventransistorlabs.com

    "Don Y" <> wrote in message
    news:lai821$ci$...
    > Hi,
    >
    > I've got a ~200W laptop brick on which I'd like to tweek the
    > output voltage (~5% -- 19.5V down to 18.5V). Anyone know what
    > sort of margins they design into these? I'm not keen on risking
    > the laptop for the sake of a $10 power supply... (i.e., "it
    > *should* work" is not an acceptable reply :> )
    >
    > Thx,
    > --don
     
    Tim Williams, Jan 8, 2014
    #11
  12. Don Y

    dp Guest

    On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 8:57:06 AM UTC+2, Tim Williams wrote:
    > I would be surprised if the laptop cared; most are probably good from
    > 16-25V. Inspecting a few laptop motherboards, it looks like there's a "HV
    > / bulk" supply from which all the others are derived; some battery
    > management circuitry selects the battery or charger (the adapter of course
    > being higher in voltage so a sync buck and battery controller handle the
    > actual charging).


    I would expect to see something like that, too. At least this is how I
    did it on the nukeman (design 1993, http://tgi-sci.com/tgi/fr64.gif ,
    then around 2000 http://tgi-sci.com/tgi/pntb.htm ).
    Basically all convertors were powered off the battery voltage which
    was 9 NiMH in series. I had put an overvoltage limit to the charger
    stepdown which limited that voltage to about 15 (or was it 15.5)V;
    in case of no battery etc., I had opamps powered powered off that
    voltage which would not survive over 15.5 (lmc6482).
    But the input voltage range was not that generous, I had used a
    PMOSFET as the charger stepdown switch and its gate was driven by
    an MC33151; which was powered from the adaptor directly, I think
    it would not survive anything above 20V. Not so sure how things
    were really. I remember I did burn a few 33151s until I got things
    to work OK though :).

    Anyway, Don's issue is with the "smart" part of the adaptor, which
    has little to do with voltages.

    Dimiter

    ------------------------------------------------------
    Dimiter Popoff, TGI http://www.tgi-sci.com
    ------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/didi_tgi/sets/72157600228621276/
     
    dp, Jan 8, 2014
    #12
  13. Don Y

    Don Y Guest

    Hi Dimiter,

    On 1/7/2014 11:21 PM, dp wrote:
    > On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 7:47:53 AM UTC+2, Don Y wrote:
    >> On 1/7/2014 10:00 PM, dp wrote:
    >>
    >>> I have bought 3-4 type of different "laptop chargers" from DX
    >>> (to use on anything but laptops, that is) and none of them had
    >>> any indications of such a thing (and I have opened... let me see,
    >>> I think 4 if not 5 types, one really old, all models would be older
    >>> than say 3 years, may be more).

    >>
    >> Have a look at:
    >>
    >> <http://www.laptop-junction.com/toast/content/inside-dell-ac-power-adapter-mystery-revealed>

    >
    > Oh so some have started to put some I2C eeprom or whatever to make
    > people buy exactly their charger.


    That's the case for the example I *showed* you. But, I2C can easily
    allow more than "identification" to reside in the power supply!
    You could just as easily put an MCU in there that monitors voltages,
    gates the output on/off, etc.

    I.e., the power supply can now become an *integrated* part of the
    laptop instead of just some "external voltage source".

    > The laptops I have been buying
    > are Acer, no such thing. Why should I be surprised really. I think
    > I have seen a Sony which did not have that sort of thing either
    > but I am not so sure about that.
    > If you have one of these laptops with "encrypted" power I don't think
    > you have many options but to pay them up (likely around $100 rather
    > than $10...).


    In my case, the concern is whether a *different* power supply
    (by the same manufacturer as the "ideal" power supply) would
    "behave" when connected to the laptop.

    The laptop could decide not to recognize the power supply
    ("wrong ID"). Or, some feature may become unavailable
    (e.g., battery charging seems to be the most common one).
    Or, something even more nefarious (e.g., if the power supply
    is "actively smart")

    > One more thing to watch for when buying, one could easily overlook it
    > I guess.


    Yup. I've seen "universal power supplies" with assortments of
    interchangeable "connectors" (and adjustable Vout). Even those
    including these "three pin" connectors. But, if they don't
    know how to identify themselves as the appropriate *actual*
    power supply, then what good are they?
     
    Don Y, Jan 8, 2014
    #13
  14. Don Y

    Don Y Guest

    Hi Jasen,

    On 1/7/2014 11:38 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:
    > On 2014-01-08, Don Y<> wrote:
    >
    >> I've got a ~200W laptop brick on which I'd like to tweek the
    >> output voltage (~5% -- 19.5V down to 18.5V). Anyone know what
    >> sort of margins they design into these?

    >
    > If ~188W output is acceptable at 18.5V tweaking the voltage should be
    > possible with no ill effects.
    > (in other words same maximum DC output current)


    That would depend on the actual topology used. For a trivial
    example, imagine a *linear* where the change would result in
    an extra ~10W going up as heat at that same output current.

    > Typically switchers use a slosed loop matching a (resistive) voltage
    > divider off the output against a fixed reference, you just need to
    > find the divider and tweak the ratio.
    >
    >> I'm not keen on risking
    >> the laptop for the sake of a $10 power supply...
    >> (i.e., "it *should* work" is not an acceptable reply :> )

    >
    > measure it and test it on a dummy load before connecting the laptop.


    Measure *what*? Vout is a no brainer. But, how do I know
    something inside the supply isn't operating closer to its
    limits?

    Remember, this is consumer kit. Everything seems to pride itself
    on how close to the edge it can be designed *and* how few days
    beyond warranty it can survive!

    The same mentality that saves fractional cents on caps is at play, here.
     
    Don Y, Jan 8, 2014
    #14
  15. Don Y

    Don Y Guest

    Hi Dimiter,

    On 1/8/2014 12:51 AM, dp wrote:
    > On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 8:57:06 AM UTC+2, Tim Williams wrote:
    >> I would be surprised if the laptop cared; most are probably good from
    >> 16-25V. Inspecting a few laptop motherboards, it looks like there's a "HV
    >> / bulk" supply from which all the others are derived; some battery
    >> management circuitry selects the battery or charger (the adapter of course
    >> being higher in voltage so a sync buck and battery controller handle the
    >> actual charging).

    >
    > I would expect to see something like that, too. At least this is how I
    > did it on the nukeman (design 1993, http://tgi-sci.com/tgi/fr64.gif ,
    > then around 2000 http://tgi-sci.com/tgi/pntb.htm ).
    > Basically all convertors were powered off the battery voltage which
    > was 9 NiMH in series. I had put an overvoltage limit to the charger
    > stepdown which limited that voltage to about 15 (or was it 15.5)V;
    > in case of no battery etc., I had opamps powered powered off that
    > voltage which would not survive over 15.5 (lmc6482).
    > But the input voltage range was not that generous, I had used a
    > PMOSFET as the charger stepdown switch and its gate was driven by
    > an MC33151; which was powered from the adaptor directly, I think
    > it would not survive anything above 20V. Not so sure how things
    > were really. I remember I did burn a few 33151s until I got things
    > to work OK though :).
    >
    > Anyway, Don's issue is with the "smart" part of the adaptor, which
    > has little to do with voltages.


    I'm concerned about the entire "subsystem" -- as the power supplies
    are obviously moving beyond "dumb voltage sources" to more of an
    "integrated system". When you start integrating things, you tend
    to use them (and design them) in ways that leverage other aspects
    of the system to improve their performance, decrease their cost
    or provide added functionality.

    It seems like there is little value to encoding *just* an "ID"
    in a power supply. AFAICT, you can't make your initial purchase
    (of the laptop) without getting a power supply in the deal. So,
    the ID only protects sales of *replacement* power supplies.

    [It also could give some liability protection if third party
    power supplies are resulting in battery fires, etc. "Due diligence"]

    Is there a big problem with folks *losing* their power supplies?
    Or, are there plans to artificially grow the power supply market
    with a move to even crappier designs/reliability??

    It looks like the safer approach, for me, is to find a deal on
    the "Right" power supplies (buying them by the dozen can help).
    Or, convince a donor to foot the bill for them...

    (though it would be an interesting question to have answered!)
     
    Don Y, Jan 8, 2014
    #15
  16. Den onsdag den 8. januar 2014 21.30.54 UTC+1 skrev Don Y:
    > Hi Dimiter,
    >
    >
    >
    > On 1/8/2014 12:51 AM, dp wrote:
    >
    > > On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 8:57:06 AM UTC+2, Tim Williams wrote:

    >
    > >> I would be surprised if the laptop cared; most are probably good from

    >
    > >> 16-25V. Inspecting a few laptop motherboards, it looks like there's a "HV

    >
    > >> / bulk" supply from which all the others are derived; some battery

    >
    > >> management circuitry selects the battery or charger (the adapter of course

    >
    > >> being higher in voltage so a sync buck and battery controller handle the

    >
    > >> actual charging).

    >
    > >

    >
    > > I would expect to see something like that, too. At least this is how I

    >
    > > did it on the nukeman (design 1993, http://tgi-sci.com/tgi/fr64.gif ,

    >
    > > then around 2000 http://tgi-sci.com/tgi/pntb.htm ).

    >
    > > Basically all convertors were powered off the battery voltage which

    >
    > > was 9 NiMH in series. I had put an overvoltage limit to the charger

    >
    > > stepdown which limited that voltage to about 15 (or was it 15.5)V;

    >
    > > in case of no battery etc., I had opamps powered powered off that

    >
    > > voltage which would not survive over 15.5 (lmc6482).

    >
    > > But the input voltage range was not that generous, I had used a

    >
    > > PMOSFET as the charger stepdown switch and its gate was driven by

    >
    > > an MC33151; which was powered from the adaptor directly, I think

    >
    > > it would not survive anything above 20V. Not so sure how things

    >
    > > were really. I remember I did burn a few 33151s until I got things

    >
    > > to work OK though :).

    >
    > >

    >
    > > Anyway, Don's issue is with the "smart" part of the adaptor, which

    >
    > > has little to do with voltages.

    >
    >
    >
    > I'm concerned about the entire "subsystem" -- as the power supplies
    >
    > are obviously moving beyond "dumb voltage sources" to more of an
    >
    > "integrated system". When you start integrating things, you tend
    >
    > to use them (and design them) in ways that leverage other aspects
    >
    > of the system to improve their performance, decrease their cost
    >
    > or provide added functionality.
    >
    >
    >
    > It seems like there is little value to encoding *just* an "ID"
    >
    > in a power supply. AFAICT, you can't make your initial purchase
    >
    > (of the laptop) without getting a power supply in the deal. So,
    >
    > the ID only protects sales of *replacement* power supplies.
    >
    >
    >
    > [It also could give some liability protection if third party
    >
    > power supplies are resulting in battery fires, etc. "Due diligence"]
    >
    >
    >
    > Is there a big problem with folks *losing* their power supplies?
    >
    > Or, are there plans to artificially grow the power supply market
    >
    > with a move to even crappier designs/reliability??
    >
    >
    >
    > It looks like the safer approach, for me, is to find a deal on
    >
    > the "Right" power supplies (buying them by the dozen can help).
    >
    > Or, convince a donor to foot the bill for them...
    >
    >
    >
    > (though it would be an interesting question to have answered!)


    most laptop chargers have a similar barrel connector, only the voltage and power varies all the smarts are in the laptop

    and you can get universal car adaptors that just a buck/boost to set the
    right voltage and a set of connectors

    There's an effort to standardize laptop chargers, similar I guess to how EU mandated that cell phones must be able to charge from USB


    -Lasse
     
    Lasse Langwadt Christensen, Jan 9, 2014
    #16
  17. Don Y

    Greegor Guest

    If the idiotic little ID chips are doing nothing
    but ID, then wouldn't it be easier to modify the
    BIOS code on the laptop so that it doesn't care
    about the ID code? The BIOS is flashable, right?
     
    Greegor, Jan 9, 2014
    #17
  18. Don Y

    Don Y Guest

    Hi Lasse,

    On 1/8/2014 6:56 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    > Den onsdag den 8. januar 2014 21.30.54 UTC+1 skrev Don Y:
    >> On 1/8/2014 12:51 AM, dp wrote:
    >>
    >>> Anyway, Don's issue is with the "smart" part of the adaptor, which
    >>> has little to do with voltages.

    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> I'm concerned about the entire "subsystem" -- as the power supplies
    >> are obviously moving beyond "dumb voltage sources" to more of an
    >> "integrated system". When you start integrating things, you tend
    >> to use them (and design them) in ways that leverage other aspects
    >> of the system to improve their performance, decrease their cost
    >> or provide added functionality.
    >>
    >> It seems like there is little value to encoding *just* an "ID"
    >> in a power supply. AFAICT, you can't make your initial purchase
    >> (of the laptop) without getting a power supply in the deal. So,
    >> the ID only protects sales of *replacement* power supplies.
    >>
    >> [It also could give some liability protection if third party
    >> power supplies are resulting in battery fires, etc. "Due diligence"]
    >>
    >> Is there a big problem with folks *losing* their power supplies?
    >> Or, are there plans to artificially grow the power supply market
    >> with a move to even crappier designs/reliability??
    >>
    >> It looks like the safer approach, for me, is to find a deal on
    >> the "Right" power supplies (buying them by the dozen can help).
    >> Or, convince a donor to foot the bill for them...
    >>
    >> (though it would be an interesting question to have answered!)

    >
    > most laptop chargers have a similar barrel connector, only the voltage
    > and power varies all the smarts are in the laptop


    That's not the case with these. *Three* conductors. The third of which
    carries "data" from (to?) the charger. At the very least, the laptop
    can say, "This is not an approved (i.e., sold by me) power adaptor.
    I refuse to ___________"

    As seen in the URL I posted (elsewhere) for Dimiter, at least one
    such adapter has a ROM inside that the laptop queries. Presumably,
    if the ROM is absent or contains "funky" data, the laptop could opt
    not to perform (or, perform incorrectly).

    It's unclear if other power supplies (including the ones in
    question) do anything *active* with the comm link (e.g., transfer
    information about the temperature of the power supply, load current,
    etc.). Or, if the laptop *commands* the power supply ("enable
    charging mode") during operation.

    > and you can get universal car adaptors that just a buck/boost to set the
    > right voltage and a set of connectors


    Different beast.

    > There's an effort to standardize laptop chargers, similar I guess to
    > how EU mandated that cell phones must be able to charge from USB


    The fact that vendors (at least IBM, Dell and HP, from my experience)
    are adding this "feature" to their power adaptors suggests they
    want to hold onto the power adapter business (?). Note you don't
    see much effort to standardize ink jet cartridges :> Nor do
    I imagine any printer vendors will be quick to embrace such an idea!
     
    Don Y, Jan 9, 2014
    #18
  19. Don Y

    Ralph Barone Guest

    Don Y <> wrote:
    > Hi Lasse,
    >
    > On 1/8/2014 6:56 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    >> Den onsdag den 8. januar 2014 21.30.54 UTC+1 skrev Don Y:
    >>> On 1/8/2014 12:51 AM, dp wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> Anyway, Don's issue is with the "smart" part of the adaptor, which
    >>>> has little to do with voltages.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> I'm concerned about the entire "subsystem" -- as the power supplies
    >>> are obviously moving beyond "dumb voltage sources" to more of an
    >>> "integrated system". When you start integrating things, you tend
    >>> to use them (and design them) in ways that leverage other aspects
    >>> of the system to improve their performance, decrease their cost
    >>> or provide added functionality.
    >>>
    >>> It seems like there is little value to encoding *just* an "ID"
    >>> in a power supply. AFAICT, you can't make your initial purchase
    >>> (of the laptop) without getting a power supply in the deal. So,
    >>> the ID only protects sales of *replacement* power supplies.
    >>>
    >>> [It also could give some liability protection if third party
    >>> power supplies are resulting in battery fires, etc. "Due diligence"]
    >>>
    >>> Is there a big problem with folks *losing* their power supplies?
    >>> Or, are there plans to artificially grow the power supply market
    >>> with a move to even crappier designs/reliability??
    >>>
    >>> It looks like the safer approach, for me, is to find a deal on
    >>> the "Right" power supplies (buying them by the dozen can help).
    >>> Or, convince a donor to foot the bill for them...
    >>>
    >>> (though it would be an interesting question to have answered!)

    >>
    >> most laptop chargers have a similar barrel connector, only the voltage
    >> and power varies all the smarts are in the laptop

    >
    > That's not the case with these. *Three* conductors. The third of which
    > carries "data" from (to?) the charger. At the very least, the laptop
    > can say, "This is not an approved (i.e., sold by me) power adaptor.
    > I refuse to ___________"
    >
    > As seen in the URL I posted (elsewhere) for Dimiter, at least one
    > such adapter has a ROM inside that the laptop queries. Presumably,
    > if the ROM is absent or contains "funky" data, the laptop could opt
    > not to perform (or, perform incorrectly).
    >
    > It's unclear if other power supplies (including the ones in
    > question) do anything *active* with the comm link (e.g., transfer
    > information about the temperature of the power supply, load current,
    > etc.). Or, if the laptop *commands* the power supply ("enable
    > charging mode") during operation.
    >
    >> and you can get universal car adaptors that just a buck/boost to set the
    >> right voltage and a set of connectors

    >
    > Different beast.
    >
    >> There's an effort to standardize laptop chargers, similar I guess to
    >> how EU mandated that cell phones must be able to charge from USB

    >
    > The fact that vendors (at least IBM, Dell and HP, from my experience)
    > are adding this "feature" to their power adaptors suggests they
    > want to hold onto the power adapter business (?). Note you don't
    > see much effort to standardize ink jet cartridges :> Nor do
    > I imagine any printer vendors will be quick to embrace such an idea!


    About the only good reason I can think of to have the power supply "talk"
    to the laptop is to allow different battery charge rates for different
    sized chargers, therefore allowing the manufacturer to sell either a big
    "home" charger or a small "road" charger and have the laptop charge as fast
    as possible with either one.
     
    Ralph Barone, Jan 9, 2014
    #19
  20. Don Y

    Don Y Guest

    Hi Ralph,

    On 1/9/2014 6:34 AM, Ralph Barone wrote:
    > Don Y<> wrote:


    >> That's not the case with these. *Three* conductors. The third of which
    >> carries "data" from (to?) the charger. At the very least, the laptop
    >> can say, "This is not an approved (i.e., sold by me) power adaptor.
    >> I refuse to ___________"
    >>
    >> As seen in the URL I posted (elsewhere) for Dimiter, at least one
    >> such adapter has a ROM inside that the laptop queries. Presumably,
    >> if the ROM is absent or contains "funky" data, the laptop could opt
    >> not to perform (or, perform incorrectly).
    >>
    >> It's unclear if other power supplies (including the ones in
    >> question) do anything *active* with the comm link (e.g., transfer
    >> information about the temperature of the power supply, load current,
    >> etc.). Or, if the laptop *commands* the power supply ("enable
    >> charging mode") during operation.


    >>> There's an effort to standardize laptop chargers, similar I guess to
    >>> how EU mandated that cell phones must be able to charge from USB

    >>
    >> The fact that vendors (at least IBM, Dell and HP, from my experience)
    >> are adding this "feature" to their power adaptors suggests they
    >> want to hold onto the power adapter business (?). Note you don't
    >> see much effort to standardize ink jet cartridges :> Nor do
    >> I imagine any printer vendors will be quick to embrace such an idea!

    >
    > About the only good reason I can think of to have the power supply "talk"
    > to the laptop is to allow different battery charge rates for different
    > sized chargers, therefore allowing the manufacturer to sell either a big
    > "home" charger or a small "road" charger and have the laptop charge as fast
    > as possible with either one.


    I can imagine a power supply "telling" the laptop that it (the power
    supply) is running hot and, thus, should reduce its load (esp given
    that the laptop has control over a *big* piece of its load -- the
    charger!).

    I can also imagine a power supply telling the laptop how much power
    it is *actually* using (adding those monitoring components *outside*
    the physical constraints of the laptop itself) so the laptop can
    better calibrate its battery monitoring algorithms (instead of
    just watching Vbat without any real idea as to how quickly it
    *should* be falling -- when operating on battery).

    And, the mere presence of a third conductor could be exploited to
    *move* the charger into the power adapter using the third conductor
    to deliver "charge current" separate from "operating power" for the
    laptop. Even potentially multiplexing (TDM) data onto that conductor!

    As I said, once you open the door to smarts in the power supply, you
    can come up with lots of more interesting designs with increased
    levels of integration across the "power cord" boundary!

    [But, other than the URL I posted suggesting "ID" information,
    I have no idea how power supplies currently use the conductor]
     
    Don Y, Jan 9, 2014
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Dan
    Replies:
    21
    Views:
    2,670
    ian field
    Jun 7, 2006
  2. Carl

    help id'ing a diode from a Toshiba laptop (see pic)

    Carl, Dec 15, 2006, in forum: Electronic Components
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    918
    Franc Zabkar
    Dec 18, 2006
  3. LVMarc

    rf meium power "bricks" FS

    LVMarc, May 4, 2008, in forum: Electronic Components
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    949
    PhattyMo
    May 6, 2008
  4. Rob

    Fireplace insert bricks

    Rob, Jan 24, 2004, in forum: Home Power and Microgeneration
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    683
    SQLit
    Jan 24, 2004
  5. Justin

    Laptop Power Bricks and Grounding (Earthing)

    Justin, Mar 18, 2011, in forum: Electrical Engineering
    Replies:
    14
    Views:
    1,748
  6. totalsurf

    Laptop power supply mod - too many volts & watts?

    totalsurf, Mar 23, 2013, in forum: General Electronics Chat
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    809
    totalsurf
    Mar 24, 2013
  7. NantachieRat

    Conar Mod. 250 & NRI Mod. W

    NantachieRat, Aug 10, 2013, in forum: General Electronics Chat
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    953
    NantachieRat
    Aug 10, 2013
  8. Gryd3

    Alleged FT232 intentional bricks

    Gryd3, Oct 22, 2014, in forum: General Electronics Chat
    Replies:
    15
    Views:
    1,155
    bigone5500
    Oct 29, 2014
Loading...