Y
Yzordderrex
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
I have to design a converter for 400w. input voltage is 20-32 and
output is along similar lines and is variable - under the micros
command. Current is about 15amps, and supply has to be clean. I'll
be getting into the project next week and I thought I would run it up
the SED flagpole.
A buck-boost converter was tried using one inductor. When the
commanded output voltage was near the input voltage the power supply
would be in a zone where it was switching back and forth between buck
and boost modes and there was some unfilterable lower frequency noise
spurs showing up.
Supply obviously doesn't have to be isolated but I think a pair of
interleaved forward converters might be a nice way to go. Other
prospects are a single forward with maybe an active clamp type of
reset. Other possibility would be seperate boost and buck controllers
in series with maybe a pic to supervise them.
Profile is very short and I have a heatsink to work with so I'm
thinking TO-220s on a copper plate with the board resting on top and
planar magnetics. Maybe one of those Berquist boards that are
bonded to an aluminum plate might work too. I have a decent heatsink
to bolt the module to.
So I'm interested to hear comments on why one topology might be better
than another.
Regards,
Bob
N9NEO
output is along similar lines and is variable - under the micros
command. Current is about 15amps, and supply has to be clean. I'll
be getting into the project next week and I thought I would run it up
the SED flagpole.
A buck-boost converter was tried using one inductor. When the
commanded output voltage was near the input voltage the power supply
would be in a zone where it was switching back and forth between buck
and boost modes and there was some unfilterable lower frequency noise
spurs showing up.
Supply obviously doesn't have to be isolated but I think a pair of
interleaved forward converters might be a nice way to go. Other
prospects are a single forward with maybe an active clamp type of
reset. Other possibility would be seperate boost and buck controllers
in series with maybe a pic to supervise them.
Profile is very short and I have a heatsink to work with so I'm
thinking TO-220s on a copper plate with the board resting on top and
planar magnetics. Maybe one of those Berquist boards that are
bonded to an aluminum plate might work too. I have a decent heatsink
to bolt the module to.
So I'm interested to hear comments on why one topology might be better
than another.
Regards,
Bob
N9NEO