Maker Pro
Maker Pro

VHF oscillator precision

A

Apparatus

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi,

I am working on building a MURS band (154.600 MHz, 20 KHz) FSK
transmitter. The issue that I'm running into is oscillator stability.

My current idea is to use a crystal based colpitts oscillator with a
JFET for the feedback element, adding a varactor in parallel for a
small amount of tuning. However, crystals themselves have typical
precision ratings of +/- 50ppm. At 150 MHz, that's +/- 7.5 kHz
tolerance, nearly the size of my band. Then the additional issues are:
the precision of the varactor, stray JFET capacitance, etc.

I have thought about also using a mixer, with two oscillators as above,
one of which is tunable via a varactor, both at around 75 MHz.
Probobalistically, the tolerances should somewhat negate (assuming much
higher mixer precision).

Without a manual tuning element, how can I hit 154.600 MHz and keep the
FSK tuning within my 20 kHz bandwidth? I feel as if I am trying to get
a hole in one from a mile away. Any insights would be much appreciated.

Cheers,
Chris
 
M

Michael Black

Jan 1, 1970
0
Apparatus" ([email protected]) said:
Hi,

I am working on building a MURS band (154.600 MHz, 20 KHz) FSK
transmitter. The issue that I'm running into is oscillator stability.
Temperature compensate the oscillator. And if that doesn't work,
put the thing in a crystal oven.

Michael
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hello Chris,
Without a manual tuning element, how can I hit 154.600 MHz and keep the
FSK tuning within my 20 kHz bandwidth? I feel as if I am trying to get
a hole in one from a mile away. Any insights would be much appreciated.

Michael's suggestion would work. If that costs too much you will need
tuning. Either by hand or, if it is a mass product, by an auto-cal
procedure at final QC where the setting is stored in flash (assuming you
have a uC with flash on there).

Regards, Joerg
 
D

Don Bowey

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi,

I am working on building a MURS band (154.600 MHz, 20 KHz) FSK
transmitter. The issue that I'm running into is oscillator stability.

My current idea is to use a crystal based colpitts oscillator with a
JFET for the feedback element, adding a varactor in parallel for a
small amount of tuning. However, crystals themselves have typical
precision ratings of +/- 50ppm. At 150 MHz, that's +/- 7.5 kHz
tolerance, nearly the size of my band. Then the additional issues are:
the precision of the varactor, stray JFET capacitance, etc.

I have thought about also using a mixer, with two oscillators as above,
one of which is tunable via a varactor, both at around 75 MHz.
Probobalistically, the tolerances should somewhat negate (assuming much
higher mixer precision).

Without a manual tuning element, how can I hit 154.600 MHz and keep the
FSK tuning within my 20 kHz bandwidth? I feel as if I am trying to get
a hole in one from a mile away. Any insights would be much appreciated.

Cheers,
Chris

First, you don't have 20 kHz.

I don't perceive a problem. The maximum channel bandwidth is, per the FCC,
11.25 kHz and permissible modulation deviation is +/- 2.5 kHz. If you build
the oscillator using insight from the crystal supplier and achieve the (very
doable) +/- 7.5 kHz stability, The signal will always be contained within
the 11.25 kHz limit. A decent receiver will have no problem capturing the
signal at it's frequency tolerance boundaries.

Don
 
R

Roger Lascelles

Jan 1, 1970
0
Apparatus said:
Hi,

I am working on building a MURS band (154.600 MHz, 20 KHz) FSK
transmitter. The issue that I'm running into is oscillator stability.

My current idea is to use a crystal based colpitts oscillator with a
JFET for the feedback element, adding a varactor in parallel for a
small amount of tuning. However, crystals themselves have typical
precision ratings of +/- 50ppm. At 150 MHz, that's +/- 7.5 kHz
tolerance, nearly the size of my band. Then the additional issues are:
the precision of the varactor, stray JFET capacitance, etc.

I have thought about also using a mixer, with two oscillators as above,
one of which is tunable via a varactor, both at around 75 MHz.
Probobalistically, the tolerances should somewhat negate (assuming much
higher mixer precision).
Without a manual tuning element, how can I hit 154.600 MHz and keep the
FSK tuning within my 20 kHz bandwidth? I feel as if I am trying to get
a hole in one from a mile away. Any insights would be much appreciated.


I don't see a sound basis for the "probabilistic solution". Surely some
units would be as bad as some single crystals ?

Once your straight crystal spec is unsuitable, the next step is TXCO -
packaged oscillator units with a varactor and thermistor setup inside to
tune out the shift. These are stable enought for your application, however,
note the aging spec. These do have a trim pin for fine frequ shift, though
it is probably not for FM. If you can't FM such an oscillator, you can use
it as a reference for a PLL and modulate the oscillator control voltage. At
that stage you might want to save money by choosing a low frequency
oscillator at sub 20 MHz and using the PLL to multiply it up.

There are chips around which make all this this terribly easy. Analog
Devices RF have some parts for FSK transmitters. Quite a few others.

Possibly you can bypass the whole thing by buying complete modules with an
data input pin !

Roger Lascelles
 
M

Mark

Jan 1, 1970
0
Apparatus said:
Hi,

I am working on building a MURS band (154.600 MHz, 20 KHz) FSK
transmitter. The issue that I'm running into is oscillator stability.

My current idea is to use a crystal based colpitts oscillator with a
JFET for the feedback element, adding a varactor in parallel for a
small amount of tuning. However, crystals themselves have typical
precision ratings of +/- 50ppm. At 150 MHz, that's +/- 7.5 kHz
tolerance, nearly the size of my band. Then the additional issues are:
the precision of the varactor, stray JFET capacitance, etc.

I have thought about also using a mixer, with two oscillators as above,
one of which is tunable via a varactor, both at around 75 MHz.
Probobalistically, the tolerances should somewhat negate (assuming much
higher mixer precision).

Without a manual tuning element, how can I hit 154.600 MHz and keep the
FSK tuning within my 20 kHz bandwidth? I feel as if I am trying to get
a hole in one from a mile away. Any insights would be much appreciated.

Cheers,
Chris

you either have to pay for a better osciallor i.e. 5 ppm or you have to
include a trimmer and pay for someone in the factory to tune it.

Mark
 
B

budgie

Jan 1, 1970
0
First, you don't have 20 kHz.

I don't perceive a problem. The maximum channel bandwidth is, per the FCC,
11.25 kHz and permissible modulation deviation is +/- 2.5 kHz. If you build
the oscillator using insight from the crystal supplier and achieve the (very
doable) +/- 7.5 kHz stability, The signal will always be contained within
the 11.25 kHz limit. A decent receiver will have no problem capturing the
signal at it's frequency tolerance boundaries.

????

The 11.25kHz channel bandwidth has to contain 2*(highest mod frequency before
roll-off) + 2* (Max deviation). That means audio roll-off would need to start
at (11.25 - 5)/2 = 3.125kHz. That's assuming the carrier is on frequency. As
soon as the carrier is off-frequency by (say) 1kHz the sum of (max dev + mod
frequency) has to drop by that amount to remain strictly within that allowed
bandwidth.

Having said that, the O/P appears to have misunderstood the +/- 50ppm crystal
tolerance. This doesn't mean it wanders around by that much in operation.
Rather it is the tolerance band for the crystal out-of-the-box and before any
frequency trimming circuit is applied. Depending on the resonant mode chosen, a
simple trim-cap or coil will normally suffice. Let's face it, commercial
two-way radios have existed in such narrowband environments for decades using -
in many cases - no temperature compensation other than a carefully chosen
ceramic cap with a known tempco.

If the O/P wants to reinvent the wheel, that's fine. For my money, I'd employ
an existing two-way off ebay and save my design time for a project where there
isn't an easy cheap off-the-shelf solution.
 
R

RST Engineering \(jw\)

Jan 1, 1970
0
And for a Really Cheap(TM) crystal oven, you mount an appropriate value
resistor (180 ohm 1 watt for a 12 volt system) next to the crystal on long
leads so that the resistor can touch the crystal case on one side and a
cheap (1N4148) diode on the other side of the case as a temperature sensor.
Shrink sleeve both the resistor and diode so that they are in intimate
contact with the crystal case. Use an op amp comparator to turn on a
saturated driver transistor and adjust the bias on the opamp so that it
switches off when the temperature of the diode gets to 50°C or so. Use a
bit of hysteresis on the comparator so that it doesn't chatter during the
switching period.

Jim
 
D

doug dwyer

Jan 1, 1970
0
In message said:
Without a manual tuning element, how can I hit 154.600 MHz and keep the
FSK tuning within my 20 kHz bandwidth? I feel as if I am trying to get
a hole in one from a mile away. Any insights would be much appreciated.
The biggest problem will be to pull the crystal frequency to nominal,
20kHZ in 200MHz is 200ppm so 50ppm at roomtemp will be within this.
Always place the varicap in series with the crystal at this frequency
and tune out external reactance to zero by a an inductance.
 
Top