VHDL and Verilog - 15 x Contract Engineers Required Urgently - Long Term Contract

[Specialist Verilog Engineers Roles]

My client is an award winning leader in their global field, and
looking to expand their broadcast engineering team. If you are an
engineer with strong Verilog VHDL experience then we would like to
hear from you. C++ and FPGA experience would be a nice to have. If you
want to be part of an unrivalled technical broadcast engineering team
then please call us. We have 15 Long Term Contract roles available.
Please call Richard Prentice on 020 7213 9876 for full information.

 

[[email protected]]

My client is an award winning leader in their global field, and
looking to expand their broadcast engineering team. If you are an
engineer with strong Verilog VHDL experience then we would like to
hear from you. C++ and FPGA experience would be a nice to have. If you
want to be part of an unrivalled technical broadcast engineering team
then please call us. We have 15 Long Term Contract roles available.
Please call Richard Prentice on 020 7213 9876 for full information.

Must be an American - nobody else would be parochial enough to post a
national telephone code to an international forum.

 

[JeffM]

Must be an American - nobody else would be parochial enough
to post a national telephone code to an international forum.

His posting history shows him to be a complete moron.
He has spewed this to multiple technical discussion groups
--and not a single *jobs* group.
http://groups.google.com/groups/sea...rKFW02vMje9YQo80rUFsLCZ76w&scoring=d&filter=0

mailto:[email protected] abuse@ btopenworld.com
mailto:[email protected]

 

[Don Bowey]

Must be an American - nobody else would be parochial enough to post a
national telephone code to an international forum.

You never miss an opportunity do you? You and the donkey are cut from the
same cloth, though at one time I foolishly held you in higher esteem than I
did the donkey jackass.

 

[krw]

Must be an American - nobody else would be parochial enough to post a
national telephone code to an international forum.

Do notice the .uk address and the 020 telephone code. As usual,
Slowman proves he's an asshole).

 

[JeffM]

Do notice the .uk address and the 020 telephone code.
As usual, Slowman proves he's an asshole).
Keith

As Sloman is from Down Under and now lives in Holland,
I'm pretty sure he's aware of the possible permutations
--unlike some straight-line thinkers.

 

[krw]

As Sloman is from Down Under and now lives in Holland,

Back down-under (the donkey, perhaps), IIRC.

I'm pretty sure he's aware of the possible permutations
--unlike some straight-line thinkers.

You assume he's thinking; an impossibility.

 

[[email protected]]

Do notice the .uk address and the 020 telephone code. As usual,
Slowman proves he's an asshole).

Sorry. I did miss the .uk e-mail address - it isn't obvious in the
vanilla view of the posting that Google groups gives me. The point
remains that the message - as posted - doesn't identify the country in
which the telephone number is valid.

I apologise for identifying the poster as an American moron - I should
have remembered that British employment agencies also employ morons,
since I met enough of them in my time in England.

 

[[email protected]]

Back down-under (the donkey, perhaps), IIRC.


You assume he's thinking; an impossibility.

Republicans do have these blind spots.

 

[krw]

Republicans do have these blind spots.

Tain't Republicans with the blind spot this time, idiot.

 

[[email protected]]

Tain't Republicans with the blind spot this time, idiot.

Perhaps I'm wrong to assume that you are a Republican - though you are
certainly dumb enough to qualify - but you have definitively
demonstrated that you have a blind spot, which means that you have
been out-thought by someone whom you believe to be an idiot.
Congratulations, sucker.

 

[krw]

Perhaps I'm wrong to assume that you are a Republican - though you are
certainly dumb enough to qualify - but you have definitively
demonstrated that you have a blind spot, which means that you have
been out-thought by someone whom you believe to be an idiot.
Congratulations, sucker.

I ain?t the dumb one either, idiot. You'd better find a mirror, if
you haven't broken them all already.

You couldn't out-think a worm, only suck at it's belly.

 

[[email protected]]

I ain?t the dumb one either, idiot.

If you say so.

You'd better find a mirror, if you haven't broken them all already.

I don't seem to share your problems with muscular coordination.

You couldn't out-think a worm, only suck at it's belly.

You must live in an interesting community. Where I come from, worms
aren't seen as intellectual competitors, but the Republican right in
America would seem to be less ambitious - I can't say I'm surprised.

 

[krw]

If you say so.

At least we agree on something; you're an idiot.

I don't seem to share your problems with muscular coordination.

No, my facial muscles can't break mirrors, as apparently yours do.

You must live in an interesting community. Where I come from, worms
aren't seen as intellectual competitors,

Exactly! You are even lower than a worm.

but the Republican right in
America would seem to be less ambitious - I can't say I'm surprised.

Nice try, attempting to back away from your *stupid* statements. The
issue wasn't republicans, rather your asinine assumption that someone
posting from a UK address *must* be an American.

 

[[email protected]]

At least we agree on something; you're an idiot.

No, we agree that you think I'm an idiot - a subtle distinction, and
one that you seem ill-equipped to appreciate.

No, my facial muscles can't break mirrors, as apparently yours do.

My environment happens to be free of broken mirrors. A more
intelligent interlocutor might have refrained from inserting
"apparently" into a sentence which in fact consists of a speculation
about an environment he's never seen.

Exactly! You are even lower than a worm.

If you say so. Only an idiot would try to read that implication into
my sentence, but idiots are insensitive to the more subtle aspects of
the use of words.

Nice try, attempting to back away from your *stupid* statements. The
issue wasn't republicans, rather your asinine assumption that someone
posting from a UK address *must* be an American.

It is unlikely - but not impossible - that someone posting from a UK
address might be an American. For example, I'm an Australian, posting
from what is - in fact - a Dutch address. Posting a national telephone
number (without the country code - +44 for the UK, +1 for the USA) to
an international forum is a stupidity exhibited more often by
Americans than any other nationality. Before you get too excited about
my asinine assumptions, you might think about your own.