eug k said:
When I run it without the amp, it's really dim.
Sounds linke you have some problem in the signal the video
source originally gives or the projector settings.
That 30 meters of RG-59 cable sould not make the image
very dim..
Check your graphics card output settings and the
projector setings. Usually one of them or both of them
have controls for brightness, contrast etc..
Setting those right usually helps to get picture right.
And if the source / projector cannot be corrected then
there is also possiblity to add some video procesign equipment
that can do image processind needed (for example
brigness / contrast / color / cable equalize controls etc..)
Actually, thinking about it again, I don't think it worked at all without
the amp.. the projector just displays nothing. I'll try it again though,
I had to do it in a rush the other day so i might have gotten my wires
mixed up!
Is that 75 DC ohms?
Would putting the amp halfway along the cable instead of at the start
help? I'd imagine that would reduce the gain required on the amp,
hopefully resulting in more "shapely" sync pulses.
I don't think in general putting the amplifier in the middle
of the cable will not change mught, if anythign at all.
The attenuation of RG-59 cable is around 2.5 db/100m at 5 MHz.
With the 30 meter cable you have we are talking about 1 dB
attenuation at high frequencies of compoiste video, and less
at lower frequencies. Quite a low loss.
I'll try borrow a scope and see if the pulses are getting screwed up.
Getting a scope it a good idea.
You might see tha the signal levels really are, and if there
are considerable signal reflections because of wrong impedances etc.
I don't have the baluns so i can't try it yet. the projector's really
high up too so i'll probably only try it if it'll definitely help.
Nowadays with right baluns CAT5 cabling can be used to transport
video from place to another. Generally going from RG-59 to CAT5
wirign does not fundamentally change things with video...
If things are not working well in the beginning, going
top CAT5 has quite lob propablity of making thing any way better.
I was planning on switching to cat5 to help reduce or eliminate interference
from the lights in the hall. They're on dimmers so at certain levels,
patterns appear on the video. Being balanced, i figured it should help.
Am I correct? Are there any disadvantages?
Interference from the lighting in the hall could be related to
ground loop problem. There are ways to solve this kind of problems
using the existing wiring. For more details take a look at
http://www.epanorama.net/documents/groundloop/index.html
CAT5 wiring is a balaced medium so it does not pick certain
interference as easily as unblanced interface.
The disadvanteges of using CAT5 are the cost of the adapters,
the balancing on many adapters is far from ideal and there
could be that the imepdance matching (75 ohm video vs. 100 ohm CAT5)
is not perfect on many adapters.
i'd also imagine if it was an earth loop problem like Colin mentioned,
the baluns should take care of it..
Balun could help in this or not.
Depends on the balun design used, the ground loop related problem
could affect the balun operation or not. Different designs
have their advantages and disadvantages.