Connect with us

uC clock question

Discussion in 'Electronic Design' started by [email protected], Apr 28, 2006.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. Guest

    Does there exist a uC of any kind where the clock source is selectable
    from code? With the PICs you have to choose the clock source at program
    time by burning fuses, and you are stuck with it. Yes the watchdog uses
    an internal RC but when it counts down the PIC wakes up with the
    programmed oscillator type.
    Here's my dilemma: I am using the clock generated by a genlock PLL to
    drive the PIC. When the video is gone, the PLL loses lock and its VCO
    output is then unknown to me. However the fact that HSYNC is gone is
    known, so I'd like to select an internal RC clock for the uC before the
    VCO goes out of spec.
    Yeah, it's not a great design, but it's a personal challenge to me and
    it's not a commercial product.
    Also (heh heh), since the PIC is being fed by the PLL, it is also
    acting as the feedback divider... I like this clever (imho) way saving
    of parts, and the clock is allowed to have jitter.
     
  2. On 28 Apr 2006 09:27:49 -0700, in sci.electronics.design
    Have a look at the Elantec/intersil video sync products ISTR a
    flywheel mode is in one of them, maybe a lost lock detector, as well

    I think AVR or MSP430 have "funny " clock systems


    martin
     
  3. Joerg

    Joerg Guest

    Check out the MSP430 series. Not only can the clock source be selected
    but you might be able to simply leave it on the digitally controlled
    oscillator (DCO) because it cannot stray too far from it's SW-selected
    adjustment range.

    Regards, Joerg
     
  4. colin

    colin Guest

    Im sure I came accros a PIC with a backup clock wich kicks in when the main
    clock stops, I may be mistaken I was just scanning quickly through quite a
    lot of datasheets looking for what I wanted, cant remember wich device it
    was in though.

    The PLL oscillator will usualy go to max or min frequency on loss of lock,
    if you want to have a clock more accurate than this then you will probably
    need an external crystal.

    Alternativly you could use one of the timers wich has a seperate input to do
    the dividing rather than count clock cycles in code (wich something you
    realy dont want to do unless you have no choice) and have a fixed clock.

    Colin =^.^=
     
  5. Luhan

    Luhan Guest

    Here is another way to genlock to a video signal...

    http://members.cox.net/berniekm/tricks.html

    (down near the bottom of the page).

    Luhan Monat (luhanxmonat-at-yahoo^dot^com)
    http://members.cox.net/berniekm/
    "Reality: what a concept!"
     
  6. It's in allot of them now. For example, the 12F683 (8 pin) and 16F88
    (18 pin) have the new INTRC oscillator that is switchable on the fly
    (uncalibrated at 31kHz; calibrated (better than 2% over a large
    temperature range) at 125kHz, 250kHz, 500kHz, 1MHz, 2MHz, 4MHz and
    8MHz). They also have the a fail-safe clock monitor that will auto
    switch on a detected clock failure. The OP needs to look again.
    INTRC on the PIC is actually better than 1% at room temperature. It is
    also tweakable on the fly by + or - 12% thru the OSCTUNE register.
     
  7. Luhan

    Luhan Guest

    PIC16F818/9 has a selection of internal clocks from 8 MHz down to 32
    KHz. These are selectable from software while the chip is running.

    Will this get you what you need?

    Luhan Monat (luhanxmonat-at-yahoo^dot^com)
    http://members.cox.net/berniekm/
    "Reality: what a concept!"
     
  8. Jim Thompson

    Jim Thompson Guest

    Glad you like those oscillators. I redesigned those internal
    oscillators in 2003-2004 ;-)

    ...Jim Thompson
     
  9. John Fields

    John Fields Guest

     
  10. Guest

    Hey that's great, thanks! Those features are not readily apparent if
    you just look at their comparison chart. I guess you have to find the
    right part first, because the 12F629 I picked doesn't do that good
    stuff. Boy things have improved since I messed around with the 12C508
    back in the Cretaceous!
    All I need is for the PIC to be able to set the PLL to /4 mode so that
    the clock the PIC sees doesn't go beyond 20MHz when the lock is gone,
    shut down the video IC properly, then shut off the PLL entirely and
    wait for HSYNCs to start coming in again.
    Weeee! Too bad the weather is going to be beautiful on the weekend, or
    I'd actually read the datasheet!
     
  11. Yeah, but they can be a bit confusing/overwhelming at first. OTOH, I
    suppose that's comes with all the flexibility. I had to read that part
    of the datasheet about ten times before it really started becoming clear
    as to how it all worked together. I forgot to mention the two-speed
    startup mode, pretty slick. Congratulations, it all actually appears to
    work, you should be proud on the relative lack of errata....being a PIC
    and all. ;-)

    By any chance, did you design the T1OSC in the 12F683? I've been
    recently playing with that using a 32.768kHz crystal for timekeeping.
    It seems to oscillate faster the longer the interval between TMR1
    roll-overs. >60ppm variation by just changing roll-over intervals (by
    preloading TMR1H with 0xC0, 0x80 and 0x00 for respective roll-over times
    of 1/2, 1 and 2 seconds before waking up) By toggling an I/O pin in the
    ISR and precisely measuring the period of the resulting square wave (1,
    2 or 4 Hz), I could see that: the longer the sleep period, the shorter
    the interval to the next wake-up; i.e. T1OSC seemed to speed up as the
    length of the sleep interval increased. Here are my recently (last 10
    minutes) measured results:

    1Hz - period ~1000006 uS ( 6ppm slow )
    2Hz - period ~1999950 uS ( 25ppm fast )
    4Hz - period ~3999777 uS ( 56ppm fast )

    Naturally, it appears that my measuring device is likely to be in error.
    Therefore, I have verified its functionality by dividing the 1Hz output
    using a binary counter chip and the results are precisely as they should
    be. Probably the most fascinating thing about this is that I don't
    really have to SLEEP. If I just loop in the main level without
    sleeping, I get the same exact results. This seems to rule out CPU
    noise as a source of interference. Now....I'd like to see someone
    explain that behavior.

    I have played allot with the capacitance parallel to the crystal, from
    too little to oscillate all the way to wayyyyy too much. Nothing out of
    the ordinary occurs, just a bit of overall frequency pulling.
    Absolutely maddening, it's as if the T1OSC is affected somehow by the
    values contained in the TMR1H register.
     
  12. Guest

    "Why not have another external oscillator as a clock source and
    switch to it when HSYNC goes away? "
    I don't know, bullheadedness? I decided to make a minimal parts count
    design, not best performance or easiest to build... It's just fun to
    use the clock that's already being generated. As long as there's video,
    it'll work fine.
    Besides, with all these new PICs, why bother? My motto is "specify,
    don't design". Someone already went through all the trouble of figuring
    out these things and working out the glitches. If I can get that for 2$
    by choosing the right part, great!
    BTW, aren't you supposed to be dead? ;)
     
  13. Jim Thompson

    Jim Thompson Guest

    I am only a ghost engineer... do the designs and leave ;-) I had
    nothing to do with the documentation.

    Only problems I had were youngsters trying to sabotage my work and
    keep me from information I needed. Really pissed me off. About the
    worst NIH/job-protection situation I've ever experienced.
    I don't know what they were called. I don't think I even have a data
    sheet.

    Looking at the directories I find GRP1OSC, LPRC, and XTAL oscillators.
    Looking at the schematics... to get all those "features" there are a
    maddening number of analog switches in there, from previous versions,
    that I had to adhere to.

    One of those "fix it but don't change anything" projects :-(

    ...Jim Thompson
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-