Connect with us

True flash ADC

Discussion in 'General Electronics Discussion' started by hitsware, Aug 1, 2020.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. hitsware

    hitsware

    6
    0
    Aug 1, 2020
    Are any true flash ADC's available ?
    I.E. comparators with parallel BCD out .
    No clock.
    Preferably DIP .... 8 bit
     
  2. Nanren888

    Nanren888

    266
    53
    Nov 8, 2015
    I presume that you are meaning to separate the technical roles of sample and hold from ADC. Often combined in modern "ADC"s.
    You still need to "clock" the sample and hold, in that a sample instant needs to be defined.
    .
    You need BCD output?
    I guess, generally when I see BCD output the task is usuualy rather a low sample/conversion rate.
    If the converter is self clocking and you are sampling slowly, does it matter that there's a clock?
    .
    Sorry, not quite sure where you're coming from.
     
  3. hitsware

    hitsware

    6
    0
    Aug 1, 2020
    > where you're coming from.
    Water over my head : )
    I want to emulate an 8 bit version of something
    like below , using a VGA monitor.
    I have ordered a BASIC computer ( I can program
    to read an 8 bit port) and hopefully use PSET
    to form a trace .
    Here is a crude simulation :

    [​IMG]
     
  4. Nanren888

    Nanren888

    266
    53
    Nov 8, 2015
    Even cascading LM3914s the resolution is limited.
    I suspect that there are cheap, computer-based scopes available. Perhaps a USB one might do?
     
  5. bertus

    bertus Moderator

    751
    268
    Nov 8, 2019
  6. hitsware

    hitsware

    6
    0
    Aug 1, 2020
    > I suspect that there are cheap, computer-based scopes available.
    Yes .... But they are all ( as far as I know ) ' DSO ' --- digital storage oscilloscopes .
    I do not want the ' storage ' ...... I like the ' feel ' of a CRT scope ..
    More immediate ...
     
  7. hitsware

    hitsware

    6
    0
    Aug 1, 2020
    Yes ... Thank You .
    But when I look at the available chips .... All ( I ' ve found )
    have way more pins , functions, and complications than :[​IMG]
     
  8. AnalogKid

    AnalogKid

    2,371
    661
    Jun 10, 2015
    Note that the schematic in post #3 will not produce the image in post #3. The schematic has no retention - as the 4017 steps through the columns, as one LED in a column lights, the LED in the previous column goes out. You will see a moving dot, not a line draw. If the writing rate is fast enough, the retina of your eye will integrate the dots into a fading line, like a tail on a comet.

    ak
     
    Harald Kapp and bertus like this.
  9. Harald Kapp

    Harald Kapp Moderator Moderator

    10,070
    2,151
    Nov 17, 2011
    To generate a voltage vs. time display you'll have to store the past values (left of the current position of the indicator/trigger). This is possible but will be a mess of chips if you want to realize this as a digital circuit without processor.

    You already ordered a basic processor. Which one? Knowing this will greatly help us aiding your further efforts. So you can program it to sample values from the ADC, store the values in memory and create the necessary signals to drive the display. Presumably you'll use a matrix display to minimize the number of signal lines and you will use multiplexing to address single pixels.
    Chances are your basic processor has a built-in ADC which you can use. This would simplify your circuit considerably.

    If your processor does not have a built-in ADC, here are some considerations:
    • As far as I know and as others have stated previously FLASH ADCs are meant to be extremely fast- No way your basic program can keep pace with the speed of such an ADC. Not to speak of your eyes and brain to process the fast sampled signals (no offense meant, man isn't meant to do that).
    • Any reasonably prized ADC will be of another type than FLASH. Common are SAR (serial approximation register) or even Sigma/Delta.
    • As you'll have to control the display via the processor anyway, you will need a lot of pins for multiplexing. Even a small 10 x 10 matrix will require 20 pins (or additional pin extender circuitry). Therefore you may want to minimize the number of connections to the ADC. A serial interface is imho the best choice. I²C will require only 2 pins (clock and data) as compared to 10 pins or more for an 8 bit parallel interface (data + control lines).
    If your processor does not have a built-in ADC, you may also want to reconsider your choice of processor. A very common alternative among hobbyists is the Arduino platform, based on Atmel processors and programmed in a C++ dialect. Don't be afraid, the Arduino's C++ dialect is surely very different from Basic, but easy to learn. Plus there is a large community with libraries and code samples for (almost) everything. Did I mention that the Arduinos have built-in ADCs?
    Other platforms are also available, have your choice.
     
    bertus likes this.
  10. hitsware

    hitsware

    6
    0
    Aug 1, 2020
  11. Harald Kapp

    Harald Kapp Moderator Moderator

    10,070
    2,151
    Nov 17, 2011
    This computer has built-in analog ports, see under I/O connector:
    You do not need an external ADC...
     
  12. hitsware

    hitsware

    6
    0
    Aug 1, 2020
    Yes ... For sure I'll try that first .....
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-