Connect with us

Transformer question

Discussion in 'Electronic Repair' started by T N Nurse, Sep 25, 2004.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. I would think that as far as toob transformers are concerned, the
    voltages between the windings would be too great to wind them bifilar.
  2. John Fields

    John Fields Guest

  3. John Fields

    John Fields Guest

    You're right.
    I'm not sure I understand what you mean unless you're referring to the
    penalty for not having two separate windings.

    To find out I set up a hypothetical situation using wire with a
    diameter of 0.1", a length of turn of 1" for the first layer and a
    window width of 2" in order to get 20 turns per layer, and using
    either bifilar winding or one winding on top of the other, for 10
    layers the total length of wire was 765.3". For the bifilar case,
    each winding's length was 382.65", but for one winding on top of the
    other, the shorter winding was 225.58" and the longer winding 539.72"!

    Taking the total number of turns per winding (100)and winding them
    separately would require twice 225.58", or 451.16". Since either the
    bifilar or "conventional" winding would require 765.3" for the same
    number of turns, that's a savings of 314.14" of wire!
  4. Chuck Harris

    Chuck Harris Guest

    Side by side works nicely too. Wind with a bobbin that has a
    partition down the middle.

    ------+ +------
    | |
    ------+ +------
    | |
    ------+ +------

  5. Jim Adney

    Jim Adney Guest

    Now I'm the one who's confused, because any way we do this, there are
    still 2 separate windings, unless you want to count the one on top of
    the other as a single center-tapped winding.
    Yes, note that 225.58 + 539.72 = 2 x 382.65. This was what I
    Yes, but the only way you can get this is to suddenly have more room
    to do windings, so it's not really a fair comparison.

    You'd have to assume that the voltage difference between adjacent ends
    of the bifilar winding would be nearly as great as the B+ voltage. I'm
    not sure how much I can expect to get out of magnet wire varnish, but
    I'm pretty sure that I wouldn't want to count on this if I were making
    a bunch of them to go out into the commercial world running on a 400V
    B+ line.

    Keep in mind also that this voltage difference would be AC, reversing
    itself with the output. This is a lot harder on the insulation and is
    a sure way to find flaws in the insulation. The ACVrms between wires
    at either end would be about .7 x B+. The voltage difference in the
    middle would actually be the same. Interesting how that works out....

    Sure I could probably make one and show that it worked just fine, but
    what would my return rate be when they went out into the field and
    people covered the ventilation slots with magazines and dirty clothes,
    while playing the stereo at full volume for hours on end. ;-)

  6. John Fields

    John Fields Guest

    Separate windings as on two separate bobbins, each with the same width
    and starting diameter and occupying a separate portion of the core.
    Yes, I know...
    It's a perfectly fair comparison and reflects the savings to be
    realized with utilizing more of the core. Consider a transformer wound
    on EI laminations with one winding on the center leg and two other
    windings wound around the outer legs. If the outer windings were
    identical, then winding them separately would result in saving about
    41% of the wire which would be needed to wind them either stacked or
  7. Jim Adney

    Jim Adney Guest

    Sure, you can do that, but you're changing the rules in the middle of
    the game: You're giving yourself a larger winding window to work with.
    (otherwise you would have slightly less than half as much length to
    work with, so each winding would build up faster and taller. The extra
    bobbin takes up some of your previous volume, so you come out behind.

    Otherwise, separate bobbins is certainly a desirable thing to do, but
    you have to allow extra space for it up front.

    I could also suggest that I would just start with a longer core so
    that I would need fewer layers, and that would save even more wire....
    That's a MUCH easier problem than 300-500 AC volts between adjacent

  8. John Fields

    John Fields Guest

    At the expense of extra core or, for the same volume, a longer
    magnetic path (not good). The game is to minimize the total cost of
    the transformer while maximizing its performance, and blithely doing
    this-and-that isn't likely to converge on a winning "design"
    Don't be ridiculous. The only problematic part about it is deciding
    what insulation to use on the magnet wire, and since there are many
    materials which can easily stand off higher voltages, that turns out
    to be a non-problem as well.

    Consider Kapton. At about 5kV/mil, a 0.0001" layer of it on adjacent
    conductors would stand off a 1000V difference between them.

    If you want to spout definitive information instead of mere opinion,
    first go slogging through the spec's for the different magnet wire
    insulation systems, then spout what you find.

    In any case, I'm getting bored with this whole thing so if you choose
    to reply you'll be talking to yourself.
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day