Connect with us

To choke or not to choke?

Discussion in 'Electronic Design' started by Richard Rasker, Nov 17, 2010.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. Hello,

    I regularly design relatively simple stuff with PIC and Atmel controllers
    and the likes, and when I need to interface with the outside world by means
    of switches or other slow interfaces, I simply use a series resistor
    between 100R and 1K, followed by a capacitor to ground, value between 1nF
    and 100nF (depending whether it's a scanning matrix or not, and the desired

    Now I ran into a bit of a dispute with another designer who says that this
    is a totally wrong approach, and that using those 3-terminal chokes instead
    of series resistors and ground capacitors is far better (also when driving
    any significant current).
    Indeed I often see 2- or 3-terminal chokes in series with supply and I/O
    lines of existing digital stuff, but even more often, they're nowhere to be

    My question: what advantage has a microhenry (or even less) choke compared
    to a well-defined RC filter? I understand the need to prevent HF from both
    entering and leaving the circuitry, and compliance with EMC regulations is
    very important, but do those little chokes actually do a better job in this
    respect than simple RC?

    Thanks for any leads,

    Best regards,

    Richard Rasker
  2. Joerg

    Joerg Guest

    Chokes can be dangerous if the inductance is larger, because of
    inductive kickback. The uC is usually going to be ok because it has
    subtrate diodes but the stuff on the other side may not.

    RC is just fine when the layout is clean. For super-sensitive apps (and
    that's hardly a uC) the 3-terminal EMI filters from companies such as
    Murata are nice because they efficiently suppress cell phone signal. But
    I have needed those only in analog settings.
  3. Nemo

    Nemo Guest

    The other designer knows SOME of the story but lacks some of the
    history. They simply allow plenty of current through. They were very
    popular for a while for power rails. Also they let fast signals through
    which 1kohm + 1nF will not.

    Unfortunately they tend to resonate too. As the EMC standards increased
    the upper frequency you had to test to, and as mobile phones became more
    common, first at 800MHz then 1.6GHz then higher again, they became more
    of a problem than a help - they actually amplified noise into sensitive
    circuitry. So they fell out of favour.

    The manufacturers caught up with the frequency requirements (1GHz) but
    now the standards bodies test to 2GHz or more... the problems are not
    apparent until you do a full EMC sweep over hundreds of MHz, so some
    people think they are great.

    The key parameter when choosing whether to use them is the speed of the
    signal going through them. If you can use a 1k resistor and 1nF cap then
    you are filtering much more effectively than one of these composite
    filters can manage, until the RC begin resonating from their own self
    inductance at hundreds of MHz (so use small surface mount ones). Another
    reason not to use them is when you intend the product to still be
    manufactured in 5 years' time. If however you need to filter USB signals
    or get significant power through a line, then use a ferrite bead and a
    capacitor, or one of these filters instead of an RC. Personally I prefer
    a discrete L + discrete C instead of these filters as there are more
    options if you need a second source or a change to the characteristics,
    and because every time I've used a 3 terminal filter it has gone
    obsolete within a few years or resonated when the EMC regs were extended.
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day