Maker Pro
Maker Pro

timed igniter for metal halide lamps

K

kfel

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hello,

Could anyone help me with designing a timed igniter for metal halide
lamp which stops
providing pulses to the lamp after 10mins. The circuit that i tried is
described below: -

Step 1A: Setup a power supply for the 555 from the ac mains using a
bridge rectifier

Step 1B: Setup a 555 timer in the monostable mode with a pulse duration
of 10mins which resets on poweron

Step 2: Connected the output of the monostable to an optically coupled
triac controller chip's input terminals

Step 3: The main terminals of triac controller are connected in series
with the neutral wire of the igniter. So after the required time has
elapsed, the triac causes the neutral to be disconnected from the
igniter thus stopping the pulses it provides to the lamp.

Problem encountered:
The above described igniter circuit works as required when the lamp is
not connected. Once the lamp is connected to the igniter it ignites
fine. But during the hot-resriking mode when the lamp has cooled down
and again beings to arc the igniter abruptly stops pulsing once the
first arc develops in the arctube.

Thanks in advance.
 
D

default

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hello,

Could anyone help me with designing a timed igniter for metal halide
lamp which stops
providing pulses to the lamp after 10mins. The circuit that i tried is
described below: -

Step 1A: Setup a power supply for the 555 from the ac mains using a
bridge rectifier

Step 1B: Setup a 555 timer in the monostable mode with a pulse duration
of 10mins which resets on poweron

Step 2: Connected the output of the monostable to an optically coupled
triac controller chip's input terminals

Step 3: The main terminals of triac controller are connected in series
with the neutral wire of the igniter. So after the required time has
elapsed, the triac causes the neutral to be disconnected from the
igniter thus stopping the pulses it provides to the lamp.

Problem encountered:
The above described igniter circuit works as required when the lamp is
not connected. Once the lamp is connected to the igniter it ignites
fine. But during the hot-resriking mode when the lamp has cooled down
and again beings to arc the igniter abruptly stops pulsing once the
first arc develops in the arctube.

Thanks in advance.

Are you supplying AC or DC to the lamp?
 
C

Chris

Jan 1, 1970
0
kfel said:
Hello,

Could anyone help me with designing a timed igniter for metal halide
lamp which stops
providing pulses to the lamp after 10mins. The circuit that i tried is
described below: -

Step 1A: Setup a power supply for the 555 from the ac mains using a
bridge rectifier

Step 1B: Setup a 555 timer in the monostable mode with a pulse duration
of 10mins which resets on poweron

Step 2: Connected the output of the monostable to an optically coupled
triac controller chip's input terminals

Step 3: The main terminals of triac controller are connected in series
with the neutral wire of the igniter. So after the required time has
elapsed, the triac causes the neutral to be disconnected from the
igniter thus stopping the pulses it provides to the lamp.

Problem encountered:
The above described igniter circuit works as required when the lamp is
not connected. Once the lamp is connected to the igniter it ignites
fine. But during the hot-resriking mode when the lamp has cooled down
and again beings to arc the igniter abruptly stops pulsing once the
first arc develops in the arctube.

Thanks in advance.

Hi, Kfel. I'd guess you're running into one of the limitations of the
555 -- its timing is dependent on the R-C components, and any noise on
the lines or in the power supply may cause premature timeout.

There can be several causes for this. If you want to stick with the
555, start by making sure you've got good bypassing on the power
supply. Put a small (.01uF) cap between pin 5 (CTL) and GND. Keep the
R and C as close as possible to the IC (preferrably tying one end of
the R directly to pin 8, and one end of C directly to pin 1. Put your
series resistor from pin 3 (OUT) to the opto as close as possible to
pin 3.

But even those things may not always work well when dealing with
inductive loads and arcs. And, without the test equipment needed to
actually measure what's going on, you're basically guessing anyway.

A better solution is to use a CD4060 CMOS counter plus built-in
oscillator for the 10 minute timing block. These came into general use
as timing ICs for time delay relays in the 1970s, because they give
more accurate timing in these situations.

The CD4060 is a divide-by-2^14 binary counter. As mentioned, it has a
built-in oscillator. If there's electrical noise present, it may mess
up one timing period, just like the 555. However, there are 2^13
(8192) timing periods, so messing up one or even several counts won't
affect basic timing accuracy.

Here's a fairly simple way to drive your opto which should be more
immune to timing glitches caused by EMI from the igniter (view in fixed
font or M$ Notepad):

|
| _/
|VCC-o/ o-o----o-------------------------------------------------.
| | | |
| | | .-.
| .---)----o R | |
| +| | | | |
| --- | | .----. '-'
| --- | .-o--------------------------. | | |
| 10uF| | | 16 | | '---o
| === | | Q14 | ___ |/ |
| GND | | 4060 3o-o-|___|-o-| 2N3904 |
| | | RS | | 12K | |> V ~
| | | 8 12 11 10 9 | | .-. | - ~
| | '-o--o----o-----o------o-----' | 12K| | === Opto-|
| | | | | | | | | | GND Triac |
| | === | .-. .-. | | '-' ===
| .001uF --- GND | R2| | | |R1 | | | GND
| --- | | | | | | | ===
| | | '-' '-' C | | GND
| o-------o | | || | |
| | o-----o---||-' |
| .-. | || |
| 33K | | | |
| | | | |
| '-' '-----|<-------------'
| | 1N914
| ===
| GND
|
(created by AACircuit v1.28.6 beta 04/19/05 www.tech-chat.de)

Here's the circuit: Bypassing is with a 10uF tantalum cap. On
power-up, the .001uF cap sends a reset pulse that clears the counter.
Then the 4060 oscillator starts working. Oscillator frequency is about
1/(2.2*R1*C). R2 should be 2 to 10 times R1, so choose C = 0.22uF, R1
= 150K, R2 = 330K. This should give you an oscillation frequency of
about 13.7Hz. Now after 2^13 of those, the output at Q14 should go
high. This will turn on the transistor, which will steal current from
the opto-triac, turning it off. Q14 also swamps out the oscillator
through the diode, so the output freezes high until power is removed.

Standard caveats apply -- trust, but verify. Check my math here. I
fully warrant that every penny you've paid for this advice will be
cheerfully refunded if I've made a math error. Make sure the circuit
works properly before connecting to the optotriac. And as always, use
an isolated DC power supply, and be careful with line voltage -- it's
dangerous if you don't know what you're doing.

Here's the datasheet for the 4060:

http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/MC14060-D.PDF

And a picture's worth a thousand words. Try AACircuit or another ASCII
schematic program -- it helps if you can make an ASCII sketch of your
circuit. Hope this helps.

Good luck
Chris
 
K

kfel

Jan 1, 1970
0
Thanks chris. I have a 60MHz digital oscilloscope (Tek make) and also a
40KV Tek probe to view the pulses from the igniter. There are certain
other points that were not mentioned in the first post.
1. I did realise that noise caused due to arcing of the discharge tube
was causing the timer to switch off prematurely.
2. To alleviate this i added a common mode rejection filter across the
line and neutral.
3. Added a MOV in parallel to the line and neutral
4. Added a 0.047uF X2 capacitor in parallel after the filter.

None of these helped and the 555 was still prematurely timing out. As
per your suggestion will try out the circuit with the 4060.
 
C

Chris

Jan 1, 1970
0
kfel said:
Thanks chris. I have a 60MHz digital oscilloscope (Tek make) and also a
40KV Tek probe to view the pulses from the igniter. There are certain
other points that were not mentioned in the first post.
1. I did realise that noise caused due to arcing of the discharge tube
was causing the timer to switch off prematurely.
2. To alleviate this i added a common mode rejection filter across the
line and neutral.
3. Added a MOV in parallel to the line and neutral
4. Added a 0.047uF X2 capacitor in parallel after the filter.

None of these helped and the 555 was still prematurely timing out. As
per your suggestion will try out the circuit with the 4060.

You'd probably need a storage scope to see what you want to look for on
this problem. EMI is typically picked up by the traces, and fed into
the 555 at the trigger pin. Also, even if you've got an isolated power
supply, the transformer interwinding capacitance can feed a glitch into
your power source.

The 4060, as noted above, was used for TDRs in the 70s, achieving quite
a bit of success with very long time delays like this. It's possible
you will have better luck with the new IC.

By the way, assuming you have a well-regulated supply, timing
repeatability will be primarily dependent on the cap. Make sure to use
one with tighter tolerance if the time delay length needs to be
consistent to within a couple of percent.

Cheers
Chris
 
K

kfel

Jan 1, 1970
0
Chris,

The oscillations do not stop using 1N4148 diode from the output to the
oscillator capacitor. Is it ok if i use 1N4148 instead of 1N914?
 
C

Chris

Jan 1, 1970
0
kfel said:
Chris,

The oscillations do not stop using 1N4148 diode from the output to the
oscillator capacitor. Is it ok if i use 1N4148 instead of 1N914?

For reference:

|
| _/
|VCC-o/ o-o----o-------------------------------------------------.
| | | |
| | | .-.
| .---)----o R | |
| +| | | | |
| --- | | .----. '-'
| --- | .-o--------------------------. | | |
| 10uF| | | 16 | | '---o
| === | | Q14 | ___ |/ |
| GND | | 4060 3o-o-|___|-o-| 2N3904 |
| | | RS | | 12K | |> V ~
| | | 8 12 11 10 9 | | .-. | - ~
| | '-o--o----o-----o------o-----' | 12K| | === Opto-|
| | | | | | | | | | GND Triac |
| | === | .-. .-. | | '-' ===
| .001uF --- GND | R2| | | |R1 | | | GND
| --- | | | | | | | ===
| | | '-' '-' C | | GND
| o-------o | | || | |
| | o-----o---||-' |
| .-. | || |
| 33K | | | |
| | | | |
| '-' '-----|<-------------'
| | 1N914
| ===
| GND
|
(created by AACircuit v1.28.6 beta 04/19/05 www.tech-chat.de)


The 1N914A and 1N4148 are interchangeable -- there shouldn't be any
problem. You might want to check your wiring -- the swamping diode is
kind of cheesy, but it should work. Be sure you haven't accidentally
connected the Q14 output to pin 12 (RST). That would do what you're
saying. The cathode should be connected to the node where the two
resistors and the cap meet. When Q14 goes high, it should swamp out
the input to CLOCK (pin 11).

Since Q14 is so slow, it might be better to check another output --
it's a mistake to probe the oscillator itself. Are you sure the 4060
is still counting?

By the way, what power supply voltage are you using? And is it a
regulated power supply?

Good luck
Chris
 
K

kfel

Jan 1, 1970
0
Dear Chris,

In the circuit diagram you have connected the 1N914 to the common point
of capacitor and resistors. This way the oscillations did not stop
after timeout. I then connected the diode between the output and pin 9
(with the cathode connected to pin 9) and this effectively stops the
oscillations upon timeout.

I am using a regulated voltage supply. The EMI problem still persists
when the lamps starts to arc. Is there no way to control this EMI with
appropriate filters etc?
 
C

Chris

Jan 1, 1970
0
kfel said:
Dear Chris,

In the circuit diagram you have connected the 1N914 to the common point
of capacitor and resistors. This way the oscillations did not stop
after timeout. I then connected the diode between the output and pin 9
(with the cathode connected to pin 9) and this effectively stops the
oscillations upon timeout.

I am using a regulated voltage supply. The EMI problem still persists
when the lamps starts to arc. Is there no way to control this EMI with
appropriate filters etc?

Alright -- we've got a good timer, anyway.

One thing which might help is pulsing the optotriac on and off at
several hundred Hz. You can do this by having the output of your 4060
counter/timer going to pin 4 (RST) of a 555 set to oscillate at, say,
800Hz. The 555 output can drive the opto directly (through a resistor,
of course).

You might want to try this and see.

Good luck
Chris
 
C

Chris

Jan 1, 1970
0
Chris said:
Alright -- we've got a good timer, anyway.

One thing which might help is pulsing the optotriac on and off at
several hundred Hz. You can do this by having the output of your 4060
counter/timer going to pin 4 (RST) of a 555 set to oscillate at, say,
800Hz. The 555 output can drive the opto directly (through a resistor,
of course).

You might want to try this and see.

Good luck
Chris

Here's the circuit with the 555 pulsing the opto:

| From
| >----------------------.
| CD4060 |
| VCC |
| + |
| VCC | |
| + .--o------o---.
| | | 8 4 |
| .-. | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| '-' | |
| | | | ___
| o-----o7 3o-|___|---. .-----
| | | | | _|_
| .-. | 555 | V ~ V_A
| | | | | - ~ / |
| | | .--o2 | | |
| '-' | | | .---' '-----
| | | | | |
| o--o--o6 | |
| | | | ===
| --- | | GND
| --- | 1 5 |
| | '--o------o---'
| === | |
| GND === ---
| GND ---
| |
| ===
| GND
(created by AACircuit v1.28.6 beta 04/19/05 www.tech-chat.de)

This works better sometimes with certain types of inductive or lighter
triac loads. You might want to set the 555 with something less than a
1KHz frequency, R1 = R2 for a 66% duty cycle.

By the way, you haven't described the other side of the optotriac.
Make sure you're using a good 4-quadrant triac that doesn't require a
ton of gate current to turn on. I like the Teccor isolated tab TO-220
triacs for most loads (e.g. Q6010) -- they're guaranteed to turn on
with only 40mA of gate current or so for all 4 quadrants, and IMHO,
they tend to work more predictably with oddball loads than many other
triacs.

Cheers
Chris
 
K

kfel

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi Chris,

Thanks for the idea regarding the 555. I did not try it out. Instead i
used one of the outputs of the counter itself to cycle the triac on and
off. This helped solve the problem of condcted EMI to a some extent. I
have also used a transient voltage suppression diode to guard against
conducted EMI. This combination seems to be working since i have been
testing it for the past one week.
 
C

Chris

Jan 1, 1970
0
kfel said:
Hi Chris,

Thanks for the idea regarding the 555. I did not try it out. Instead i
used one of the outputs of the counter itself to cycle the triac on and
off. This helped solve the problem of condcted EMI to a some extent. I
have also used a transient voltage suppression diode to guard against
conducted EMI. This combination seems to be working since i have been
testing it for the past one week.

Great, Kfel. Glad you've got it working.

Remember that the 4024 output probably is going to be stressed driving
an opto (10-20mA). You might want to use a standard NPN transistor to
boos the current:

|
| VCC
| +
| |
| | _|_
| V ~ V_A
| - ~ / |
| |
| ___ |
| .--|___|--'
| | R
| From ___ |/
| 4024o-|___|-o-| 2N3904
| 6.8K | |>
| .-. |
| | | |
| 6.8K| | |
| '-' |
| | |
| === ===
| GND GND
|
(created by AACircuit v1.28.6 beta 04/19/05 www.tech-chat.de)

Cheers
Chris
 
Top