Connect with us

Time to get rid of the resistor.

Discussion in 'Electronic Basics' started by [email protected], Mar 12, 2005.

  1. Guest

    As I understand it the resistor wastes energy by converting it into
    heat. Consider this simple circuit a battery connected to a light bulb.
    The light bulb shines onto a photocell the photocell charges the
    battery. Thus the light bulb functions as a resistor but some of the
    energy has been recovered. Now that the problem has been defined
    someone who understands the physics better can work on making a
    resistor that does not waste power.
     

  2. Why don't you get yourself an education and
    pursue this breakthru idea yourself? While you
    are at it, maybe you can invent a noiseless
    resistor for use in amplifier circuits.
     
  3. Back in physics class, many years ago, I heard about schemes to use
    flywheels to store braking energy. This is the same deal. The idea is
    that instead of just dissipating the energy into heat, one somehow
    couples the brakes into a flywheel, saving some of the energy.

    I believe the Toyota Prius uses a scheme where braking force is used to
    charge the battery, but this may be more sales pitch than reality.

    Switch mode power supplies are devices that attempt to cleverly
    circumvent resistive losses by transferring energy using a magnetic field.

    Just because they say you can't do it doesn't mean it can't be done. You
    are never going to win the game (zero energy dissipation), but you may
    be able to hedge against loss somewhat. 50 years ago, nobody could have
    imagined the complexity of integrated circuits today. Who knows what the
    next 50 years will bring?

    --
    Regards,
    Robert Monsen

    "Your Highness, I have no need of this hypothesis."
    - Pierre Laplace (1749-1827), to Napoleon,
    on why his works on celestial mechanics make no mention of God.
     
  4. The entire NY MTA fleet of "new technology" subway cars uses this
    technique to feed electricity back to the "third" rail instead of
    generating pure heat while braking. This and an adjustment in
    acceleration of the trains results in 240,000,000 killowatt-hours per
    year. That's allota juice.

    http://www.mta.nyc.ny.us/nyct/facts/ffenvironment.htm

    I believe that there are also large city buses that compress air to help
    slow down. They then release the air to help get the bus moving again.
    Seems smarter than just making heat to get stopped. I would also think
    that you could wind up a spring and use the stored energy to get going.
    But it would be heavy and large not to mention quite dangerous.

    * I think they actually pump hydraulic fluid from one holding tank to
    another while compressing air is a side effect to store the energy.
    field.

    I'd say that by acheiving >90% efficiency, it's more than a "clever
    attempt". ;-)
     
  5. Tom Biasi

    Tom Biasi Guest

    Hi,
    The resistor doesn't waste energy it just transforms it.
    If you have no need for the heat then to you it is wasted.
    What you are saying is that a portion of the energy that supplies the light
    bulb does not make light.
    You wish to recover the energy that does not make light.
    It can and is done now.
    Take a look at some of the efficienticencies of transforming energy and see
    what is feasible.
    Could we power a generator with a motor and power the motor with the
    generator and have a continuous supply of motion?
    Regards,
    Tom
     
  6. Tom asked:

    "Could we power a generator with a motor and power the motor with the
    generator and have a continuous supply of motion?"


    Even if the generator and motor did not each have inherent losses then what
    would this accomplish?
     
  7. Their technical descriptions indicate this clearly
    enough that it would be fraudulent if not true.
    Of course, one could assert the the energy
    losses make it a gimic, and some performance
    numbers would be needed to gainsay that.
    Can you imagine a non-dissipative resistor that
    could accept thermal noise from another resistor
    and convert any fraction of it into work? (This
    question is either trick, rhetorical, or a starting
    point for an interesting discussion.)
     
  8. Tom Biasi

    Tom Biasi Guest

    That was for the OP to ponder :)
     
  9. PeteS

    PeteS Guest

    Of course, there are other good reasons we use resistors (and yes, they
    'waste' power).

    As noted, switch mode power supplies (and class D amplifiers) make
    slick use of integrating energy so they are far more efficient, but the
    complexity of these is such you could not (at present; I've been in
    this game long enough to know what we do not do now can change rapidly)
    use such techniques everywhere.

    Consider the lowly ordinary linear amplifier. It will, by definition,
    waste power if one simply does the mathematics of Po/Pi where Pi is the
    input from the power supply and the energy from the input source. There
    you have the efficiency of the amplifier and it will always be fairly
    low (for a linear amp - let's say Class A). Non-linear amplifiers have
    been used for many years where efficiency was a concern and circuit
    techniques could be used (Class C amplifiers for RF power sections are
    an example).

    This reminds me of the laws of thermodynamics:
    1. You can't win.
    2. You can't break even
    3. You can't get out of the game.

    So will there eventually be a replacement? Perhaps; but the utility of
    the humble resistor in many areas (pullups/downs, termination devices
    and thousands more) will have it living in new systems for some time to
    come :)

    Cheers
    PeteS
     
  10. Rodney Kelp

    Rodney Kelp Guest

    I think the idea is to have surplus power to have the motor do work and yet
    maintain the motor with the generator. But I think you would need to inject
    an antimatter stream somewhere to make it work.
     
  11. Guest

    OK here is another one have the light bulb shine on the photocell and
    connect the solarcell in series with the bulb biased the other way.
    With a solarcell of .5 volts you can have a reverse voltage of just
    about anything you want. I can see some one making this as a single
    device, a tungstan filiment enclosed with the solarcell sealed with
    epoxy for 69 cents. Yes I know this is inefficent I just want to
    stimulate discussion.
     
  12. Ok, I'll bite. Voltage is not power, and few
    people want voltage for its sake alone.
    To see that requires some lack of
    aquaintance with simple economics.
    (I assume this is still related to the
    resistor mentioned in your subject.)
    You are bordering on a troll. Perhaps you
    should go to the library and read up about
    the history of perpetual motion machines.
    They have long appealled to some people,
    and you may be one of them. If not, that
    study will be educational in ways that go
    beyond the science involved.
     
  13. phaeton

    phaeton Guest

    Or on a similar note (to the point about transformed energy is only
    wasted if you don't want it)...

    Some of those very large electrical junctionboxes (look like a huge
    heat sink) that you'll find in a lot of industrial parks or on the
    edges of shopping centers. You know, the big green ones that buzz
    loudly. iirc, they've got a huge step-down transformer in there that
    is converting line voltage into something useable by industrial
    equpment.

    Does the gigantic transformer throw off enough electromagnetic
    oscillation to energize the coils of a smaller transformer (about the
    size of your fist) if it is placed nearby? Could you used this "waste"
    to power anything? I've always wanted to take a small transformer and
    meter up to one and see what i'd get, but with the Patriot Act and
    all....

    ....or maybe i'm just insane. I have pondered a "lossless resistor"
    like the OP speaks of, as well. I'm unfortunately not educated enough
    to do anything about it :-(
     
  14. John Fields

    John Fields Guest

     
  15. John Fields

    John Fields Guest

     
  16. John Larkin

    John Larkin Guest

    I think I could design such a device, depending on what you mean by
    "non-dissipative." It might deliver something close to 1e-24 watts if
    you allow me to run it in liquid helium.

    You can actually, fairly easily, build a black-box device that runs at
    room temp but appears as a very cold 50 ohm resistor.

    John
     
  17. John Larkin

    John Larkin Guest

    It's not waste power; you'd be stealing real energy from whoever owns
    the shopping center, but not a lot.

    John
     
  18. That was a little vague, alright. I was just trying to
    indicate that not all its input power was converted
    to heat, which is redundant in this context.
    If it can recover some thermal noise from passive
    devices that exist same ambient temperature, and
    if it delivers any fraction of that power as work
    without consuming more power from an outside
    source, then you can run it in any medium you
    like, and I would like to be an early investor!

    Even if it is not that miraculous, I would like to
    know how you would do that, in general terms.
    I don't know if it would work in the black box
    you have in mind, but a high gain antenna would
    do that if aimed right, at least for some range of
    frequencies. (We do get to limit that, right?)
     
  19. Guest

    Yes this a serious post. At some point in basic electronics you are
    asked to compute the power used by a resistor. For some reason
    engineers don't care if the devices they design use energy efficently.
    Pick up some batteries off the street that some one has thrown away
    they average 1.2 volts. At 1.2 volts an alkaline battery still has
    about 40 percent of its energy left. Design a radio to use 4.5 volts
    but takes 4 batteries. Have a circuit that uses 3 batteries at a time
    while rotating the unused battery at a regular interval. Then when the
    voltage of the batteries drops to 1.2 volts each the circuit switches
    to using all 4 batteries in series. All the batteries can be run down
    to .9 volts each where they have about 10 percent of their energy left.
    This idiot circuit could have been made 100 years ago. A modern radio
    would test each battery, you could then mix types of batteries in a
    radio. A resistor that throws away heat is only one part of an energy
    wasting device. Perhaps what I am thinking of is instead of a resistor
    you need a current limiting device.
     
  20. Sadly, a current limiting device wastes the same amount of energy as a
    resistor (perhaps more, since it will require some control, which could
    take power as well.) The problem is that many times, engineers use the
    fact that resistors 'waste' power in their circuits. Dropping a given
    amount of current from voltage a to voltage b means that a certain
    amount of power must be taken out somehow. Your light idea was a way to
    regain some of that power (a very small amount).

    However, if you are worried about battery pollution, you should rest
    easy knowing that there are circuits that can draw batteries down to
    quite low levels. They are proliferating in the form of white light LED
    driver circuits. They generally use the magnetic field in inductors to
    drive the thing. This is similar to two paddle wheels which are coupled
    by a mechanical connection of some kind. If the driving paddle wheel
    takes energy from a stream that is dropping 5 meters, it can raise 1/3
    of the amount of water up to 15 meters (minus some loss for friction,
    energy collection efficiency, etc).

    However, considering energy efficiency of resistors when people drive
    SUVs to the supermarket and leave their computers on all night is like
    rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic as it sinks.

    --
    Regards,
    Robert Monsen

    "Your Highness, I have no need of this hypothesis."
    - Pierre Laplace (1749-1827), to Napoleon,
    on why his works on celestial mechanics make no mention of God.
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-