Please, will you check this:
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/ApolloSystems/ApolloSystems.HTM
This is all the study I have led on the electronic interfaces which are in the official documentations of the NASA (I give links to these documents).
The electronic interfaces are really weird; if you look at them from far, or with uninformed eyes, they could look normal, but, if you look at them attentively, and have some knowledge of electronics, you can see they are full of aberrations, and that these aberrations are very obviously all intentional.
It's very clear to me that the NASA and MIT engineers sabotaged the project because they have been forced to do something against their conscience.
Incredible aberrations ccan also be found in the onboard computer of the LM and the CM:
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/AGC/AGC.HTM
I have started to get interested into the technical documentations because I have seen an incredible number of incoherencies in the photos of the missions, and I have quickly seen that these incoherencies were all intentional, absolutely not accidental, and sometimes made with much imagination.
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/MainPage.HTM
They have been playing with perspective, the theory of shadows, the properties of the photographer's shadow (that I explain in my introduction) to create the incoherencies.
Very often, it is clearly visible they have moved objects to create incoherencies.
The videos show some really weird things.
The flight of the LM in space makes no sense either: they say it reaches the altitude of a boeing before starting to brake, but a boeing is a big airliner flying in earth atmosphere, benefitting of the two air forces (horizontal and vertical) and with a speed which is relatively moderate compartively with the initial speed of the LM.
They represent on a schema the CM at an altitude which is the same as the moon's radius when it fact it was 16 times smaller (and which makes that the trajectory they show is completely wrong, it turns too much around the moon), they make the CM turn in the opposite direction of the moon's rotation, which makes that the speed of the moon's rotation adds to the orbiting speed of the CM instead of subtracting, and it's the interest of the LM to have a horizontal speed as small as possible relatively to the moon, because it will have to nullify it before it reaches the moon.
I have made plenty of videos on youtube to express my doubts.
I don't say I never made errors, I have made some, but it's only a minority; the vast majority of my points are correct and prove the NASA and MIT engineers clearly sabotaged the Apollo project; they would never have done it if it had been real.
That made me a moon hoaxer, a moon hoaxer by reason, and not because, like some think, I would hate America (I love America, but the real honest one, not the one which is dishonest and cheats).
I just think that America was not ready in the sixties to send a spaceship to the moon (and neither were the Russians of course), and that, even today, we still couldn't do it.
The NASA never really tested the LM (the tests which have been made with a light structure are ridiculous, abd have absolutely nothing to do with the real conditions the LM had to be used), and the NASA has made no real test on the radiations in space; a monkey was sent to space two months before Apollo 11, and he came back dead; the Apollo believers claim that it is for other reasons than radiations that he died, but they have no proof of it.
The moon can bounce back a laser beam without the help of retroreflector, tests had already been made before Apollo which proved it was possible.
And lunar meteorites can be found in antarctica which have the same properties as the rocks which would have been brought back by the astronauts (and Von Braun made a trip to antarctica two years before Apollo 11); furthermore, only a little minority of these rocks have been analyzed, so the other ones can perfectly be fake; people will believe the other ones are also genuine because those who have been analyzed show to be genuine.
And there were two communuication lines at the NASA center of operations; one with the saturn rocket, that is a true one, and one for the lunar mission, i.e. a fake one, controlled by different people; it was not necessary to have two different communication lines, one would have been enough if the mission had been authentic from A to Z.
I am convinced that the CIA orchestrated a big scam, probably to divert the american people from the Vietnam war (and also may be to get funds for it that the Americans would not have been so ready to pay for, like they were accepting for the dreamy lunar missions, for the americans were starting to get tired of this war).
This is my conviction; of course, I have made speculations, I don't have proof of everything I assert, but the incoherencies I have seen are not speculation, they are absolute certitude, and the fact that they are intentional is also absolute certitude; and this certitude is totally coherent with my speculations.
Now, you judge!
Am I a stupid moon hoaxer, or am I one who has reasons for having doubts?
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/ApolloSystems/ApolloSystems.HTM
This is all the study I have led on the electronic interfaces which are in the official documentations of the NASA (I give links to these documents).
The electronic interfaces are really weird; if you look at them from far, or with uninformed eyes, they could look normal, but, if you look at them attentively, and have some knowledge of electronics, you can see they are full of aberrations, and that these aberrations are very obviously all intentional.
It's very clear to me that the NASA and MIT engineers sabotaged the project because they have been forced to do something against their conscience.
Incredible aberrations ccan also be found in the onboard computer of the LM and the CM:
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/AGC/AGC.HTM
I have started to get interested into the technical documentations because I have seen an incredible number of incoherencies in the photos of the missions, and I have quickly seen that these incoherencies were all intentional, absolutely not accidental, and sometimes made with much imagination.
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/MainPage.HTM
They have been playing with perspective, the theory of shadows, the properties of the photographer's shadow (that I explain in my introduction) to create the incoherencies.
Very often, it is clearly visible they have moved objects to create incoherencies.
The videos show some really weird things.
The flight of the LM in space makes no sense either: they say it reaches the altitude of a boeing before starting to brake, but a boeing is a big airliner flying in earth atmosphere, benefitting of the two air forces (horizontal and vertical) and with a speed which is relatively moderate compartively with the initial speed of the LM.
They represent on a schema the CM at an altitude which is the same as the moon's radius when it fact it was 16 times smaller (and which makes that the trajectory they show is completely wrong, it turns too much around the moon), they make the CM turn in the opposite direction of the moon's rotation, which makes that the speed of the moon's rotation adds to the orbiting speed of the CM instead of subtracting, and it's the interest of the LM to have a horizontal speed as small as possible relatively to the moon, because it will have to nullify it before it reaches the moon.
I have made plenty of videos on youtube to express my doubts.
I don't say I never made errors, I have made some, but it's only a minority; the vast majority of my points are correct and prove the NASA and MIT engineers clearly sabotaged the Apollo project; they would never have done it if it had been real.
That made me a moon hoaxer, a moon hoaxer by reason, and not because, like some think, I would hate America (I love America, but the real honest one, not the one which is dishonest and cheats).
I just think that America was not ready in the sixties to send a spaceship to the moon (and neither were the Russians of course), and that, even today, we still couldn't do it.
The NASA never really tested the LM (the tests which have been made with a light structure are ridiculous, abd have absolutely nothing to do with the real conditions the LM had to be used), and the NASA has made no real test on the radiations in space; a monkey was sent to space two months before Apollo 11, and he came back dead; the Apollo believers claim that it is for other reasons than radiations that he died, but they have no proof of it.
The moon can bounce back a laser beam without the help of retroreflector, tests had already been made before Apollo which proved it was possible.
And lunar meteorites can be found in antarctica which have the same properties as the rocks which would have been brought back by the astronauts (and Von Braun made a trip to antarctica two years before Apollo 11); furthermore, only a little minority of these rocks have been analyzed, so the other ones can perfectly be fake; people will believe the other ones are also genuine because those who have been analyzed show to be genuine.
And there were two communuication lines at the NASA center of operations; one with the saturn rocket, that is a true one, and one for the lunar mission, i.e. a fake one, controlled by different people; it was not necessary to have two different communication lines, one would have been enough if the mission had been authentic from A to Z.
I am convinced that the CIA orchestrated a big scam, probably to divert the american people from the Vietnam war (and also may be to get funds for it that the Americans would not have been so ready to pay for, like they were accepting for the dreamy lunar missions, for the americans were starting to get tired of this war).
This is my conviction; of course, I have made speculations, I don't have proof of everything I assert, but the incoherencies I have seen are not speculation, they are absolute certitude, and the fact that they are intentional is also absolute certitude; and this certitude is totally coherent with my speculations.
Now, you judge!
Am I a stupid moon hoaxer, or am I one who has reasons for having doubts?
