Connect with us

SPDIF to TTL

Discussion in 'Electronic Design' started by Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, Jun 7, 2010.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote...
    That's a simple AC signal to DC logic conversion,

    .. | \
    .. AC ---||---+---| >O--+----
    .. | | / |
    .. | |
    .. '---/\/\---'

    I'd say, yes, in the absence of any signal, an HCU04 gate
    would do a better job of settling at 1/2 Vcc, and perhaps
    do so with less class-A current, but in the absence of a
    signal, who cares what happens? In practice, S/PDIF lines
    have a continuous AC signal, so this simplified circuit's
    feedback RC node should find the average of the incoming
    data stream. Also, the continuous huge signal means the
    gates won't have a class-A rail-rail current problem.

    s/pdif data doesn't have a 50% duty cycle, which gives me
    pause, but Andrew Kilpatrick, Randy McAnally and ESP =
    Rod Elliott swear by it, so it must be adequate. :)

    http://www.andrewkilpatrick.org/blog/?page_id=215
    http://www.andrewkilpatrick.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/spdif_circuits.gif

    OTOH, you can get official s/pdif receiver connectors and
    ICs for a few bucks, and that seems a bit more professional.
     
  2. Winfield Hill wrote...
    Check that, s/pdif's biphase mark code is more than
    close enough to a 50% average for good RC coupling.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biphase_mark_code
     
  3. Grant

    Grant Guest

    Averages 50% in the longer term, that's why it's an AC coupled signal.
    Yes, but there's more to life than doing everything efficiently ;)

    Grant.
     
  4. In the following schematics page 17 upper left corner, you see a working
    solution (I have the eval board, its working nicely in coax SPDIF mode).

    http://focus.ti.com/lit/an/slea035a/slea035a.pdf

    MIKE

    --
    www.oho-elektronik.de
    OHO-Elektronik
    Michael Randelzhofer
    FPGA und CPLD Mini Module
    Klein aber oho !
    Kontakt:
    Tel: 08131 339230
    Usst.ID: DE130097310
     
  5. M.Randelzhofer wrote...
    It's interesting that TI picks an 'U04. An 74LVC2GU04
    to be exact. They do use this simple ac-coupled-circuit
    in a PurePath Digital reference design for their rather
    sophisticated custom silicon for high-performance audio.
     
  6. Jim Thompson wrote...
    Right, I'm well aware of that. Old stuff, dating back to
    the 60s when I started using cmos, or COS/MOS as RCA called
    it back then. But the question was about the viability of
    non-U types for this, do you have an opinion about that?
    Not what's naturally best, but whether it'll work OK.
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-