Connect with us

Rodin Coils

Discussion in 'General Electronics Discussion' started by Raven Luni, Jan 27, 2012.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. Raven Luni

    Raven Luni

    798
    8
    Oct 15, 2011
    Greetings,

    I was wondering if anyone else here has actually experimented with these. I built one out of curiosity a while ago and found that it didnt have any remarkable qualities at all - just behaved like a normal magnetic coil - and a very inefficient one at that.
     
  2. BobK

    BobK

    7,682
    1,687
    Jan 5, 2010
    Yes, free energy devices do not work.

    Bob
     
  3. Raven Luni

    Raven Luni

    798
    8
    Oct 15, 2011
    It wasn't the free energy I was interested in (I'm crazy, not stupid :p ) - more the supposed shape of the magnetic field which was also a load of bull :p
     
  4. (*steve*)

    (*steve*) ¡sǝpodᴉʇuɐ ǝɥʇ ɹɐǝɥd Moderator

    25,477
    2,820
    Jan 21, 2010
    I can do no more than point you to this.

    If, after reading it, you still think there is something serious to study...
     
  5. GonzoEngineer

    GonzoEngineer

    321
    2
    Dec 2, 2011
    Hey RavenLuni.......Want to buy some crystals? I can give you a good deal!:rolleyes:

    They are gauranteed to balance your energy and cure cancer!:D
     
  6. Raven Luni

    Raven Luni

    798
    8
    Oct 15, 2011
    Oh I've had a good play with the numbers and know well how they can be applied to any number base. I did manage to get something from it though which is a half decent algorithm for converting between number bases.

    I have something of a mystical background myself which I wont go into but it never ceases to amaze me how much simple numerical patterns and truths are worshipped by some people. The freemasons are the worst for it. These people want to try some real mathematics :p
     
  7. Raven Luni

    Raven Luni

    798
    8
    Oct 15, 2011
    No thanks. I've got plenty of crystals ;)
     
  8. (*steve*)

    (*steve*) ¡sǝpodᴉʇuɐ ǝɥʇ ɹɐǝɥd Moderator

    25,477
    2,820
    Jan 21, 2010
    Sounds to me like a Numerologist with illusions of grandeur.

    Seems to target the "I don't understand science, so it must be wrong" crowd.

    I have no real argument with the pretty patterns he "discovered", but leaping straight from "oh, look, a pretty pattern" to "this shows the way energy flows" is a pretty huge leap. And it's a huge leap made without any explanation or demonstration of why it might be true.

    Of fundamental importance, if he wishes us to discard current explanations of how things work, then he bears the burden of showing that his explanation fits *at least* as well, and preferably better than current theory does with observation.

    And it must be able to, becuase:

    And really, have you read this:

    Science by revelation -- I think not.

    You must go here, it's a hoot. However I need to warn you that it may exceed your annual safe gobbledygook exposure in one visit.

    I leave you with one gem (but fear not, there are many more)

     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-