Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?

[Dionisio]

Dionisio, whether out of stupidity or dishonesty, does not realize
or pretends not to realize that a fully searchable website doesn't
help you find something when you don't know what to look for.

<smirk> You mean folks like those pesky reporters? They didn't know what they were looking
for?


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

The first mistake in dealing with the Christian Right has been to allow its definition of
the issues to go unquestioned. While the movement's reasoning is faulty, its use of
rhetoric is flawless.
-- Kenneth Chafin, Oct 2, 1994 - former pastor of Walnut Street Baptist Church in
Louisville and former professor of evangelism and preaching at Southern Baptist
Theological Seminary.

(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)

 

[No One]

With only the rarest of rare exceptions, *every* court record is
public, every plea made is public, the transcripts are public, the
documents thereof are public, it's all wide open. But some folks don't
seem to know that...

And there are so many of them that finding one when nobodyhas any idea
it is even there essentially buries it. Is this really so hard for
you to understand?

<rest snipped - he's just acting like a child again>

 

[No One]

<smirk> You mean folks like those pesky reporters? They didn't know
what they were looking for?

They didn't until one person found it, someone working for _Roll
Call_, which specifically covers the legislatuure, at which point they
knew where to look.

I can't find it right now, but I sort of recall reading that Craig
filed some sort of report noting the arrest in some obscure Senate
document. Maybe the Roll Call reporter found that. We don't know
as he didn't say how he found out about it.

 

[No One]

OH.
MY.
GAWWWWWWWWD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You looked in your local phone book for L CRAIG?
WHY??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
What a loon you are.

"Emerson Wainwright" is the new name used by the troll ScottyFLL, who
is simply recycling his old material. He has a grudge - a very long
one and when his feelings are hurt, he acts out, regessing to the
point where he has the maturity of a 12 year old boy.

He's now trying to divert attention from the fact that the name
"Larry Craig" is not exactly an unusual one. There are many people
with that name all around the U.S.

 

[No One]

Emerson is a family name (as is Wainwright).

ScottyFLL, of course, is not.

"Emerson Wainwright" is the new name used by the troll ScottyFLL, who
is simply recycling his old material. He has a grudge - a very long
one and when his feelings are hurt, he acts out, regessing to the
point where he has the maturity of a 12 year old boy.

He's now trying to hide the fact that he previously posted as ScottyFLL
for a long time.

 

[No One]

What's this?!? Death and I are no more?!?
Oh dear...

We can add a third pea if you wish. I guess he's your type given what
you jsut said.

 

[No One]

Which is why it's utterly ridiculous to be looking in small-town phone
books for people with that name "L. Craig".

I mean... who the hell would think to do that but a fucking LOON?

"Emerson Wainwright" is the new name used by the troll ScottyFLL, who
is simply recycling his old material. He has a grudge - a very long
one and when his feelings are hurt, he acts out, regessing to the
point where he has the maturity of a 12 year old boy. He is a
pathological liar.

His current post (under his ScottyFLL name) is a case in point: the
fact that "Larry Craig" is a common name means that you are going
to find a lot of arrests with people named Larry Craig. It's time
consuming to continually go through all that in the hopes of finding
an arrest of a senator, given how rare that is. So Craig had a good
reason to believe the record would be buried.

 

[No One]

Well, no................................... I've admitted to being
the same person.................
Do try to keep up.

You are arguing with me using both names and you kept it secret until
it was pointed out by a third party.

"Emerson Wainwright" is the new name used by the troll ScottyFLL, who
is simply recycling his old material. He has a grudge - a very long
one and when his feelings are hurt, he acts out, regessing to the
point where he has the maturity of a 12 year old boy. He is a
pathological liar.

 

[Dionisio]

Sure someone can check and they'll find that you were silent for nearly
all of the time I was arguing with ScottyFLL (now calling himself
Emerson Wainwright).

Then let's allow them to check.


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

Eschew obfuscation

(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)

 

[Dionisio]

And there are so many of them that finding one when nobodyhas any idea
it is even there essentially buries it. Is this really so hard for
you to understand?

Oh please... They knew his itinerary, they knew when and where he was. That narrows things
down a bit. Also, there are some darn useful tools that they have access to that the
general public doesn't. Actually, there are some pretty good tools available to the public
in some of the better libraries. For instance, want a phone number but don't know the
name? If you know the address, a reverse directory comes in quite handy. Real estate
agents love 'em.

<rest snipped - he's just acting like a child again>

And what didn't you like this time? <rummages backwards through the thread> Oh. I see.
Your ">"s = forgery thing gave even you pause, eh? Well, there might be hope for you yet.


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

About 6 months ago (perhaps longer) there was a great deal of discussion in Canada on bill
C-41 which among other things would recognize homosexuals as a target of hate crimes.
There was this member of the liberal party (incidentally it was the liberal party that
introduced the bill) who stood up and started talking about how homosexuality is immoral,
and unnatural and destroys the family. The rather delicious irony of the whole thing was
the she was a divorced mother with a 15-year-old daughter who was knocked up. Yes, William
Bennett is most definitely correct on this one.
-- [email protected] (Patrick Rogoschewsky), 11 Aug 1995

(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)

 

[Dionisio]

They didn't until one person found it, someone working for _Roll
Call_, which specifically covers the legislatuure, at which point they
knew where to look.

Yeah, it's a bitch being a public figure. Get charged with an offense? Paperwork.

Silly, Mr. Craig. He knew that before he got caught. Knew that all the time the reporters
were digging. Didn't stop the impulse though...


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about what I accept as reality."
-- Calvin

(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)

 

[No One]

Then let's allow them to check.

I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you. Nobody else cares.

 

[No One]

Oh please... They knew his itinerary, they knew when and where he
was. That narrows things down a bit.

ROTFLMAO - didn't you even look at the thing Craig signed off on?
I mean, *really* look at it. It was a PDF file, but you couldn't
select text from it. Why? Because it was an image of paperwork
(literally) entered into a computer via a scanner, with no OCR
used.

It was burried. Senators travel a lot. Hardly any get into
trouble. Trying to track each guy's travel itinerary, including
which flights he took and where he changed planes, is a lot of
work, with a very small chance of any payoff.

And most reporters are lazy. Proof - look at all the newspapers that
reported that Craig said he had a "wide stance". He said no such thing
- he said he was a "wide guy". The arresting officer made the "wide
stance" thing up as a paraphrase, and everyone copied it and turned it
into a quote. It was easier to regurgitate what others had said than
to find the original material on your own.

 

[No One]

Yeah, it's a bitch being a public figure. Get charged with an
offense? Paperwork.

Silly, Mr. Craig. He knew that before he got caught. Knew that all the
time the reporters were digging. Didn't stop the impulse though...

As I said, he took a calculated risk and lost. He probably figured
the downside was no worse than dealing with the PR issues if he
contested the charge.

 

[No One]

That's the sign of addiction. It's apparent: the wide-stanced
senator from Idaho is addicted to hot man-on-man action.

Jumping to conclusions as usual. Craig is not addicted to "hot
man-on-man action", not at his age and physical condition, even if
he is gay.

 

[No One]

How the hell do YOU know?

Because to be addicted to something, you generally have to do it
frequently enough to generate the physiological changes associated
with addiction.

Now, we can do a poll. All those gay guys reading this who would be
willing to do it with Larry Craig please raise your hands. Even
you don't want to do it with him. Why would you think anyone else
would? If he can't get it, he won't be able to get addicted to it.

Also, remember you said "hot man-on-man action" which requires at
least one hottie. Name a hottie who would be willing to have sex with
Larry Craig. The closest you'll come up with is Teddy Haggard's rent
boy, and the blogger who spilled the beans on Craig's arrest thinks
the rent boy's claim about Larry is bogus - probably an attempt to get
another round on the talk-show circuit.

Addiction doesn't discriminate by age or physical condition.
The man can't control his impulses.
He's an addict.

Nope. See above. No hottie will do it with him, so he can't
get any "hot man-on-man action" (your term) to get addicted.

 

[No One]

Well, that should give you some information right there.

The information it gives us is that you are full of it.

It's not that WE have to see it all the time.
But his behavior has had serious negative consequences.
SERIOUS.
Family, job, reputation. And then the FINAL blow: trouble with the
law.
Yet he continues to engage in it.
Indeed, he KNEW that the Idaho Statesman was keeping an eye on him.
Yet still, he couldn't help but go after a little hot-man-sex in the
MSP public lav!

You are repeating yourself and you have no proof about his sex life.
But given what he knew about the Idaho Statesman, it is pretty
obvious as to why he might try anything to cover it up, including
pleading guilty to a nebulous reduced charge, whether guilty of the
actual offense or not.

Your problem is that you are trying to have it both ways and you
can't.

Because I know that some people -- and especially sex addicts -- do
not care with whom they ****.

Well, let's try the poll - this is about Larry and even your sex
addicts (if real) must have some minimum standards.

He likely started this behavior MANY years ago. Remember when he
denied being involved in that page scandal before he was even
implicated in it?


OK, ya got me there!


$$$$$$$$$$

No, $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
(more than Larry has in the bank).

He doesn't actually need the guy to be hot.

It was *you* who said "hot man-on-man action". So, why don't you try
to rephrase whatever the hell it is you mean. Maybe you should drop
your attempts at using colorful language when that language is
misleading.

<rest of repetition snipped>

 

[No One]

That's because information given to you doesn't sink in until it's
been repeated (and repeated and repeated).

No, you are repeating yourself because you won't admit that you are
grossly overstating your case.

Pull your head out of your ass and get some air.

Instead of posting vulgarities, why don't you produce your proof? You
know, credible evidence. The Idaho Statesman spent months beating the
bushes and all they could turn up nationwide were 8 people who claimed
to have had sex with him, leading off with Teddy Haggard's rent boy,
including two who simply thought he acted funny. and ending with four
who wouldn't say anything publicly. I bet if I did that sort of
search, I could find 8 people in the U.S. who thought they had sex
with space aliens, Osama bin Ladin, or Jesus Christ. See if you
can produce something credible, and your assertions simply won't do.

Rather than covering it up, he would have been well advised to not do
it in the first place.

Do what? Go into a restroom to take a dump? Be a clumsy oaf? Of
course, we know what you mean, but you are begging the question as
you have no proof and know it (hence your angry reaction to a little
skepticism).

 

[No One]

I'm "overstating" the fact that Craig's behavior has led to problems
in his personal life and professional life and has finally resulted in
legal problems?

You made claims of "addiction". Try to remember what you post.

We've been here already.
The proof is evident to all but those whose heads are up their bums.

Still acting like you are in junior high school?

LOL!

There's no evidence that the senator from Idaho is "clumsy".



There is ALSO no evidence that he took a "dump", as you so beautifully
describe it.

He was sitting on a toilet. What do you think most people do there?

Indeed, what we DO know is that he didn't bother to flush the toilet,
which would suggest that there was nothing in the toilet to flush.
Which means he didn't take a "dump".

No, it "means" that, when a police officer flashes a badge underneath
a partition and tells you that you are under arrest, you must might
forget to push the 'flush' button. And some people don't bother to
flush at all, leaving it to the next guy using it.

Which means he was trolling for hot man-sex.
QED

No, not at all. Curiously, while the officer reported that he didn't
flush, he never bothered to look to see if there was in fact nothing
to flush - very sloppy IMHO.

It isn't begging the question.
It is....
.... are you ready? ....
COMMON
SENSE
OK?

No, it is begging the question.

 

[No One]

What does THAT have to do with the price of eggs?

Try reading the whole post before replying. And also try to think:
Text-based searches don't work on images.

Well... unless they're Republican.

Really? Care to provide some statistics?