Maker Pro
Maker Pro

push-push on/off switch

J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
John,

Despite all the critical comments I simply took it as a "concept" idea
which does basically work, but would need "tidying up" to become fully
functional.

It is very tidy, and fully functional.
We probably all have seen push-on/push-off or touch toggle switches
which have been implemented using CMOS gates etc but the nearest I can
find to your concept circuit is this practical design by Bill Bowden
"High Current MOSFET Toggle Switch with Debounced Push Button" shown
here http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Bill_Bowden/page9.htm

Sort of brute force. You can add infinite memory to my circuit with
two more parts.

John
 
J

Jim Thompson

Jan 1, 1970
0
It is very tidy, and fully functional.


Sort of brute force. You can add infinite memory to my circuit with
two more parts.

John

Show it ;-)

...Jim Thompson
 
J

Jan Panteltje

Jan 1, 1970
0
I wonder if you could fiddle something similar with a MOSFET with two
several sections of an LM339, plus accurate current mirrors.


OK here is the ONE active component semiconductor version:


U1 U2
+250 +12
|-- |
| | |
P1- R2 -- ------ +12V
| | | |
| |----R4 ----- |_| sync 0V
R1 |
| |
| |---
|-------\| UJT
| |---
|-> o ut |
C1 R3
| |
/// ///

P1 is a potentiometer that sets the frequency, by controlling the charge current in C1.
The generated sawtooth is linear with in few percent, more if U1 is higher.
Sync lowers the UJT voltage a bit via R2 / R4 to cause early trigger (normally it runs at f < normal).

This is an old trick to get a linear ramp, and in fact the tube circuit uses it too I think.
As C1 charges, the current becomes (U1 - UC1) / (P1 + R1).
For a fixed UC1 (about 6 V in this ciruit), much smaller then U1, the charge current IC1 depends mainly
on U1 / (P1 + R1).
QED.
 
T

Tom Del Rosso

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim Thompson said:
No. But a stable-state switch would be more interesting.

Fun, useful, stable-state, and interesting.

(Maybe not so useful as it once was.)
 
Top