Connect with us

power consumption of integrated circuit in 0.13µm CMOS technology

Discussion in 'Electronic Basics' started by Geronimo Stempovski, May 11, 2007.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. Hi all,

    currently I am investigating a data sorting algorithm on hardware. The
    algorithm was implemented in VHDL and is currently running on a Xilinx
    Virtex-II Pro XC2VP70 - FF1704 FPGA. Power consumption is a crucial aspect
    in the target application. Therefore I made an analysis with the Xilinx
    Virtex-II Pro Web Power Tool (www.xilinx.com) and obtained satisfying
    results.

    Now I'd like to make an estimation what this circuit would consume on a
    comparable ASIC 0.13µm CMOS technology (the FPGA is also based on a 0.13µm
    CMOS technology). The target clock frequency is 180 MHz, activity ratio is
    15%. Is there any rule of thumb or calculation rule?

    Any help is highly appreciated !!!!

    Regards Gero
     
  2. Del Cecchi

    Del Cecchi Guest

    power is .5*c*v**2*f*sf. Sounds like you know everything but C. So you
    would need to synthesize or otherwise get a gate count, assume a load
    per gate and go from there.
     
  3. austin

    austin Guest

    C * F * V^2 = P

    There is no "1/2", as you get power when you charge, and also when you
    discharge a node.

    E=1/2 CFV^2 is appropriate for energy stored in a capacitor, not for the
    power dissipated when nodes are switching (Charging AND Dis-charging).

    Austin
     
  4. Del Cecchi

    Del Cecchi Guest

    true for clocks but data lines usually only transition one direction per
    cycle at most. so conventionally SF=2 for clocks in power calculators.
     
  5. John Larkin

    John Larkin Guest

    There are several design houses that specialize in flipping fpga
    designs to asics. I bet one of them would give you a quick estimate.
    Google "fpga asic conversion service" or something like that.

    John
     
  6. Peter Alfke

    Peter Alfke Guest

    If you want to retain the 1/2, then I suggest you use T (for
    transition) instead of F (for frequency), in order to avoid the
    ambiguity.
    A factor of 2 might actually mean something :)
    Peter Alfke
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-