ISTM that, often, when a microcontroller seems to be the logical
choice for a controller, a "PIC" is chosen as the device of choice
because the development tools are largely free.
Disregarding the development costs, will a PIC dissipate less power
over the lifetime of the product than another microcontroller?
Hi, John:-
There are a lot of variables- some of the on-chip PIC peripherals are
not very low power, but they generally can be turned off. They have a
"nanowatt" series that have some optimizations. Speaking as a factory
authorized PIC consultant, I'd recommend you look at them. ;-)
However, as myself, a confirmed microcontroller agnostic, I'd say that
they may not be the best possible solution in any given case. Another
series you should look at is TI's MSP430 series, technically 16-bit,
but they are more like an 8-bit processor in cost. Billed as ultra-low
power and with lots of peripherals for such applications like LCD
drivers. They also are pretty good at crunching numbers at full speed
(16x16 hardware multiplier on some). No 5V or through-hole flash
parts, though, IIRC.
The lowest power is probably from mask-programmed (50K MOQ)
specialized chips from outfits that specialize in such devices, as
you'd find in some high-end timepieces.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany