Pic interface with sensor

Waiting doesn't get anything accomplished. You have to be proactive. Did you read the Electronics magazine article that @Bluejets linked to? Did you try to find and read any of the references cited at the end of the article? Have you defined your range and resolution measurement requirements yet? What are they?

Other than you posting a datasheet, I haven't seen any effort on your part, Raj. Do please tell us what problem this particular sensor is supposed to help solve, and why you have chosen it as a possible solution to that problem. We need a dialog here, not terse comments conveying little or no new information, for a successful outcome to your project... whatever that might be. You haven't described your project yet. Now would be a good time to do that while you are waiting on a response from Nissha FIS.

 

Your reply raises more questions than it answers, and it answers NONE of the questions I have asked. Based on the lack of any informed response from you, I don't see how anyone here has provided you with any help.

You say you are trying to design a gas alarm as part of your PGC project. What is a PGC project? Is this a school project? What does the acronym "PGC" mean? What gas do you want to detect? What is the minimum concentration of this gas that must be detected? What other gas, if present, could interfere with detection of the target gas, and how would you account for this? What are the consequences of "false negatives," the acceptance of null results when in fact gas concentration exceeds alarm levels?

To detect a gas you must measure its concentration, typically in parts-per-million, over a specific range of anticipated concentrations. What is this range of anticipated concentrations, and how many parts-per-million detection resolution do you need? The answers to these two questions, which you have so far not provided, are absolutely critical to enable a successful gas detector alarm design.

You mention you have already seen some of the components inside a commercial gas alarm, but you refuse to identify the manufacturer or the model of the device your friend allowed you to examine. Why is that? Are you violating some law if you were to tell us who made the gas alarm and what model it is?

The DC-to-DC converter, if indeed present, may or may not have anything to do with providing pulsed V_H or pulsed V_C power to the sensor. V_H especially needs to be a small and regulated voltage pulse to avoid damaging the platinum heater element. You will need more than a DC-to-DC converter to achieve that. And what specific model PIC did you see during your examination? I hope you took plenty of high-resolution and in-focus pictures of the commercial gas alarm.

Knowing the specifications of a working commercial product would go a long way toward defining specifications for something you might be able to build. I doubt that you would be able to "reverse engineer" the commercial version. The code downloaded into the PIC has most likely been "locked" to prevent theft of that intellectual property. Some manufacturers even grind off the part identification numbers embossed on the surface of the PICs and other ICs to prevent reverse engineering of the circuitry. The fact that the gas alarm device is no longer in your possession for examination limits any possibility of duplication, even if you had the skills to do so.

 

A schematic would be good.

Are you "hoping" to somehow take the 0.65 V DC pulse from the drain of the FET? Is the drain connected, through an unspecified resistor, to the positive DC output of an adjustable voltage regulator, nominally set to produce 0.65 V DC? If so, there will be zero output voltage at the drain when the FET is ON and conducting to the grounded source.

If a regulated voltage of 0.65 V DC is applied through the unspecified resistor to the drain when the FET is OFF, and there is no conduction to the source, this voltage divides unfavorably between the drain resistor and the heater resistance. For example, if the drain resistor were half the value of the heater resistance, the 0.65 V DC would be only 0.325 V DC at the heater terminals.

I thought you needed to provide a voltage-regulated, low-impedance, 0.65 V DC pulse to the heater. Or have I visualized your circuit incorrectly? That is why we use schematic diagrams to discuss circuits here.

 

I do like the idea of an adjustable, low-voltage-regulated supply, with its output to the heater somehow controlled by an FET (MOSFET, really) without losing the voltage regulation. There should be a way to do this; you just need to find it. Meanwhile, I will try my luck with Google to see what I can find. The voltage applied to the heater probably needs to be inside a feedback loop that controls the output of the voltage regulator, perhaps with some convenient means to disable the voltage regulator when no output is needed. If a solution can be found, it will apply equally well to the measuring voltage as well as the heater voltage.

Continue with your research! Next thing to do is to find out what a dangerous concentration of natural gas is. There are two kinds of danger: danger from an explosive mixture being ignited, and danger of suffocation by the displacement of oxygen from the air. There should be some information available regarding when (and how) to detect and protect people and equipment from both dangers.

 

@Rajinder: With almost no effort, I found this DC-to-DC buck converter with a wide range of adjustable output voltages. You might want to pick up a couple to "play" with. DigiKey will sell you two for about $17.00. Here is a link to a page where you can view or download the datasheet for the OKR-T/6-W12-C.

The thing I noticed about it is the ability to turn the output on and off using a logic-level input for control. You still need a MOSFET switch circuit to control the output pulse width because I don't think it turns on fast enough. I couldn't find a spec on how fast it turns off, but the fact that you can turn it on and off provides some lee-way in the pulsed output circuit design. I am looking at p-channel MOSFETs as a possible high-side switch, but an n-channel MOSFET with the appropriate integrated circuit driver might be a better route to take. I have no experience in this area yet, so I will need to purchase some p-channel MOSFETs to experiment. Since this is your post-graduate certificate project, I suggest you set up a small work area and do the same. I may lose interest if I don't see any effort on your part.

 

Why would you choose a project requiring design skills that you haven't developed yet? There are plenty of off-the-shelf commercial gas sensors available. How are you advancing the state of the art by trying to re-invent this particular wheel? Does someone hand out Post Graduate Certificates like jelly beans, without any demonstration of work or competence? Or is this a team project, where EP members are supposed to carry the load while you receive the glory? What is your part in this project?

 

Whew! It is nice to know that you DO have some help. This would be quite a project for a production team of, say, six or seven experienced members, to include marketing and sales people who would decide how to place the end product for maximum return on investment. School is different. Most post-grads I have worked with are content with doing just enough hardware/software to demonstrate feasibility and proof-of-concept, sometimes only breadboarding a concept and then writing a paper about it. Very few have gone on to produce anything remotely useful, other than the Masters or PhD degree they are awarded for their efforts. Those who do put forth the extra effort are often rewarded with nice jobs and a boost in their career, but it has to be in a area that someone wants and is willing to pay a little extra to obtain. Not too sure that applies to gas sensors, but PIC programming skills and knowledge of analog electronics is valuable.

Remember what I said about choosing to use a very high resolution analog-to-digital converter, typically a sigma-delta converter, with enough dynamic range to encompass your entire raw data signal. If you digitize and convert the raw data to floating-point arithmetic, you can do ALL your offset and scaling functions in software and not have to worry about analog electronics... except for best construction techniques to avoid introducing noise into your data.

Sounds like you are well on your way to getting this successfully finished.