Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Novice needs help with crazy project

M

MassiveProng

Jan 1, 1970
0
seeing how it works

I am quite sure that VERIZON will be interested in your spoofing
activities.

Message-ID: <54RLh.12075$dG.9794@trndny08>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:11:29 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.112.228.239
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: trndny08 1174396289 71.112.228.239 (Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:11:29
EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:11:29 EDT
Xref: Hurricane-Charley sci.electronics.repair:108475
sci.electronics.design:330173 alt.electronics:8530
sci.electronics.basics:75788
X-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:11:41 MST (be16.phx)

Complaint sent, fuckhead. They don't **** around with warning
emails either dipshit. Your account is in the toilet.
 
M

MassiveProng

Jan 1, 1970
0
I'm glad you imagine you do.

I do. It was the same silver powder used for photography. Very
fast burn, very bright flash. The fireworks folks still use it in
almost everything. It is called flash powder.

It doesn't change the fact that you
abundantly announced to everyone that you know almost nothing about
chemistry and are seriously in need of an education.

There is airspace in every bullet cartridge. Do you deny this fact?
 
M

MassiveProng

Jan 1, 1970
0
Late at night, by candle light, MassiveProng


Oh **** off. I'll do whatever I damn well please and there's nothing
you can do about it except piss and moan.

That is only due to the fact that I follow laws. If that were not
the case, dumb fucktards like you would be plowing fields at a prison
farm, because that is where I would ship your ass, trial or not.
 
M

MassiveProng

Jan 1, 1970
0
quote:
If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you summarize
the original at the top of the message, o

]
Yes. This means QUOTE the original pertinent material, idiot, NOT
that you should post your CRAP at the top of the reply.

You could be a little more retarded, just not in this life.

NOTE where I summarized your point first, at the top, with a quoting
from you, and then straightened out your bent perception of its
meaning in my subsequent reply material BELOW it!

Get a clue, dipshit.
 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
Consider how much oxygen is consumed when they explode, compared to how
much oxygen is in that airspace:

M80s have something like 99% or more of their oxidation done by oxygen
in non-gaseous material that they have.
I doubt that any of the oxidizer comes from "air". It's not where it
needs to be when the flame front gets there.
 
J

John Fields

Jan 1, 1970
0
I work in an environment where a very large amount of communication is done
via email between a very large number of people in a Fortune 500 company and
everyone top posts.

---
This is not a very large Fortune 500 company and this is not email.
This is USENET and hardly anyone top posts.
---
It just seems right to us. I was not trying to be difficult.
I was only ignorant of your adamancy.

---
I assumed, since you've been here for about a month and have posted
17 articles, (and no doubt read many more threads) that you would
have noticed that bottom posting was the norm. Since that didn't
seem to be the case, I asked you to bottom post and when you refused
to I was curious about your motivation.

For your edification:

http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
 
J

John Fields

Jan 1, 1970
0
[email protected] (MassiveProng) wrote in



Here is a quote (cut and paste actually) from the very page you guys
keep sending me to .. to see YOUR rules ..

read the last line of YOUR fucking bible ...

but I guess you decide which rules apply ...

quote:
If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you summarize
the original at the top of the message, or include just enough text of the
original to give a context. This will make sure readers understand when
they start to read your response. Since NetNews, especially, is
proliferated by distributing the postings from one host to another, it is
possible to see a response to a message before seeing the original. Giving
context helps everyone. But do not include the entire original!

***

so yes .. I understand the bottom post thing .. but .. if YOU are too
fucking LAZY to trim the post then put up with the top post. period
 
M

Michael A. Terrell

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jack said:
I work in an environment where a very large amount of communication is done
via email between a very large number of people in a Fortune 500 company and
everyone top posts. It just seems right to us. I was not trying to be
difficult. I was only ignorant of your adamancy.


This isn't email, its Usenet.

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
S

sg

Jan 1, 1970
0
just a thought how about using wireless. I guess the quality might not
be good and will have some delay.
 
R

Rich Grise

Jan 1, 1970
0
I doubt that any of the oxidizer comes from "air". It's not where it
needs to be when the flame front gets there.

In fact, air just gets in the way - some portion of the blast energy gets
dissipated by the shock wave.

Cheers!
Rich
 
J

Jamie

Jan 1, 1970
0
YD said:
Late at night, by candle light, MassiveProng
<[email protected]> penned this immortal
opus:




Oh **** off. I'll do whatever I damn well please and there's nothing
you can do about it except piss and moan.

- YD.
DOn't worry YD, he's a ****, that is why he can piss and moan at the
same time!..
 
M

MassiveProng

Jan 1, 1970
0
Why have you adopted the pseudonym of the most hated, reviled, stupid,
profane, useless piece of crap that USENET has ever produced?


Can't handle my jabs... that's all you're about, BOY!
 
Y

YD

Jan 1, 1970
0
Late at night, by candle light, MassiveProng
That is only due to the fact that I follow laws. If that were not
the case, dumb fucktards like you would be plowing fields at a prison
farm, because that is where I would ship your ass, trial or not.

Oh **** off a bit more. If I find the design for something that
interests me I'll build it no matter what. Now stick that in your
prong and light it up.

- YD.
 
Y

YD

Jan 1, 1970
0
Late at night, by candle light, Jamie
DOn't worry YD, he's a ****, that is why he can piss and moan at the
same time!..

LOL!

- YD.
 
M

MassiveProng

Jan 1, 1970
0
Why have you adopted the pseudonym of the most hated, reviled, stupid,
profane, useless piece of crap that USENET has ever produced?

Because the fucking retarded twit doesn't realize that spoofing
someone else's posting info is a severe TOS violation, and that
verizon will soon be letting him know that very thing.
 
M

Marc Britten

Jan 1, 1970
0
But, if it's patented, it'll be illegal for you to build one.

It's illegal to build one to the patent specs, however patents are
very specific. Using something besides fiber optics, and mounting the
screen in a different manner pretty much gets him around this patent.
 
F

feebo

Jan 1, 1970
0
You are still infantile as ever. Oh, well. Meanwhile, please check
with someone other than your dad about M80's and where their oxygen
comes from. You may learn something.

Jon


wasting your time Jon.

MP has a habit of arguin about stuff when he think he knows how it
works and then demonstrates (by spouting this "knowledge") that he
actually knows close to nothing at all... if you can get a word in
edgeways, ask him about PIN security :eek:) he was publicly slaughtered
on that one - I was a bit cruel, drawing him into making absolute
statements then producing an MSc written doc that shows how it all
really works.

While the tit-for-tat is amusing for a while I am certain you will
tire of it shortly.

all the best

H
 
Top