Connect with us

My brutally honest opinions on *soundcard* MIDI synths.

Discussion in 'Electronic Basics' started by Radium, Feb 28, 2007.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. Radium

    Radium Guest

    Hi:

    I know I've brought this extremely-off-topic subject up -- and in
    other groups -- before but I just can't get over it. I apologize
    profusely to those who might be annoyed. I hate soundfonts,
    emulations, softsynths, and sample playback MIDI synths.

    I request that readers please read this message from began to end
    until they fully understand it.

    To be honest, I've tried "white hat guy" tactics for along time in
    many forums [such as the Creative Labs forums] and have either been
    ridiculed, ignored, or given wrong information [on purpose].

    As for hiring someone to make a card, its going to cost $$billions and
    even then they still might do a shabby job. Like most people, I don't
    have anywhere near the amount of money necessary to get someone to
    make a customized MIDI synth for me.

    Am I better off building own FM synth chip design myself after
    learning about how it works? I mean, I just don't have the money
    necessary to make someone do it for me. Its so very unlikely that
    anyone will be willing to do it for me because that person already has
    billions in his/her account and has nothing to lose by refusing me or
    building the FM chip in a defective manner, no matter how kind and
    patient I am. Hell, such rich folks have nothing to lose by attaching
    a dynamite to it and then laughing sadisticaly as my room catches fire
    when I turn the synth on.

    For these dudes, its do all at your own risk, nothing guaranteed at
    all. These guys just don't care. All they want is money, but they
    already have too much of it. So there is no incentive for them to
    build me a professional, upgraded version of CMS220. Even if I was the
    richest and friendliest individual on earth, I'd still be taking a
    *huge* risk in requesting anyone to build any customized hardware for
    me. Cuz they still wouldn't give a f---

    CMS220 has one of the best synth pads. Try comparing the quality of
    polysynth-pads of a sample playback MIDI synth to that of CMS220.

    Polysynth pads are my favorite instrument in Creative Music Synth
    [220].

    Nothing sounds more refreshing the sound of SB16's polysynth pads with
    the central channel removed.

    The halo-pads of CMS220 provide a touching psychedelic sound. Compare
    that to the stale, boring, halo-pads of a soundfont based MIDI synth.

    Once again, the synth pads of softsynths really stink. In CMS220,
    theyare far more pleasant.

    Polysynth on FM gets to exploit its main advantage, dynamic
    synthesis. The tone was generated on an FM synth, so naturally an FM
    synth can do it better than any stinky soundfont kakaa.

    On the Creative website -- forums.creative.com -- I am known as
    "CMS220"

    In the above link, is where I take revenge against the following:

    1. Creative Technology for no longer making or upgrading Creative
    Music Synth [220]

    2. Customers who like -- or don't mind -- sample playback MIDI synths,
    softsynths, emulations, and soundfonts

    3. Customers who dislike -- or don't care for - Creative Music Synth
    [220]

    On the Creative Technology site, I first asked my questions politely
    but no one answered me. I then got frustrated and vented all my anger.
    Now those jerks know how I feel.

    I lost control of my temper and used very bad words. As a result, any
    computer with my home IP address cannot access the Creative forums.
    Also, if I login under the name "CMS220" in any part of the world, the
    Creative site will automatically ban access to its forums from that
    network. They've banned access to the forums from three places already
    because I logged in under CMS220. They've got some auto-ban type of
    feature, it seems.

    It started off like this. I asked in the Creative Technology
    http://forums.creative.com as politely as I could. I waited a couple
    of weeks. No response. I asked again as politely as I could, waited
    another few weeks. Again no answers. I tried on the third and last
    time as politely as I could. AGAIN, no answers!!!

    I then got impatient and aggressive. I started venting my anger in
    those forums. I used bad words. As a result, they've permanently
    banned my IP and I can no longer access their forums. What a buncha
    jerks. Yes, I did get carried away with the foul language but hey, can
    ya blame me?

    So I can no longer sign-in under CMS220. I got a new username "SB16-
    ISA-FM" and logged in from another network outside my house. I started
    venting my anger again using colorful language. One of the Creative
    Technology companymen then sent me a warning note, in which he/she/it
    threatened to contact my ISP and shut-down my internet connection.
    What those fools don't realize is that I can log in under any name
    from any network that I am given access to. It doesn't have to be from
    my house.

    Maybe if Creative Technology weren't made up of such jerks, then I
    wouldn't have started spamming their forums in the 1st place. So its
    not my fault.

    I would like a real Creative Music Synth [220]. Doesn't have to be in
    a sound card. It could be a keyboard, a MIDI box or in any other
    form.

    Sadly, its not gonna happen because the mechanism by which Creative
    Music Synth [220] is kept classified as top-secret by Creative
    Technology Ltd. CMS220 is no longer made yet the sick @$$ company
    still keeps the working of CMS220 a secret.

    Creative Technology is a stubborn piece of crap. F--k those stingy
    secretive bastards.

    I hate sick sample playback MIDI synths, softsynths, emulations, and
    soundfonts.

    I just wish the audio communities would revert back to real, non-
    emulated SB16 FM synthesis and upgrade from there.

    FM emulation [or any audio emulation for that matter] is sample
    playback. Sample playback synth = human kakaa

    SB Live stinks like human kakaa. It has no real music synthesis. Its
    all kakaa-like emulation.

    SB16 PCI has the disadvantages of SB16 ISA [e.g. limitation to 16-bit
    resolution] without the advantages [e.g. *real* FM synthesis]. All
    SB16 PCIs should be burned in oxyacetylene flames.

    AFAIK, some PCI cards contain something called 'Yamaha FM synth'. I
    hate it though because it is emulation. The Avance sound card has
    'Avance FM synth', but its also a real stinker as it isn't a real
    synth. The evil PCI loves to inflict pain on other types of slot --
    ISA being the unfortunate victim. PCI cards don't contain real FM
    synths.

    Anything kind of 'OPL' a PCI would have, would be emulation. The only
    'OPL' any PCI cards have is OPL emulation. Emulation stinks like human
    diarrhea kakaa foam. I don't understand why a PCI card cannot contain
    a real FM synth like Creative Music Synth [220]. Is there a technical
    barrier to this?

    I can easily tell the difference between the freshness, brightness,
    warmth, and liveliness of a *real* synth from the stale, cacophonous
    -- or rather KAKAA-FOAMous -- fart of emulation.

    Creative Music Synth [220] = SB16 ISA's FM synth = my favorite MIDI
    synth.

    I don't care for other MIDI synths.

    Creative Music Synth [220] is:

    1. Real

    and

    2. Digital

    and

    3. Hardware

    and

    4. Real-time

    All other FM synths are okay. Wavetables are also good. But I don't
    care for them.

    Here is my ratings for soundcard MIDI synths:
    1. Creative Music Synth [220]
    2. Digital hardware FM synths other than Creative Music Synth [220],
    non-FM digital synths [including *real wavetables*; excluding sample
    playbacks, soundfonts, and emulations], and analog synths
    3. Sample playback synths, soundfonts, softsynths, and emulations of
    synths.

    Sample playback synths, soundfonts, softsynths, and emulations are the
    worst. They all STEEEENK!!!!

    Soundfonts = thick stinky diarrhea kakaa foam of humans

    Sample playback MIDI synths, softsynths, emulations, and soundfonts
    are the worst audio equipment ever. They are stinky, tickly, itchy,
    creepy, irritating, farty, foamy, hissy, terrifying, disgusting, and
    annoying.

    I like the audio quality of Creative Music Synth [220]. It sounds so
    warm, fresh, bright, rejuvenating, lively and effervescent.

    The only thing about Creative Technology that I like is their Creative
    Music Synth [220]. Other than that, they are a piece of kakaa.

    Creative Technology is one f--king piece of crap that provides sh--ty
    customer service. Their tech support is so limited.

    Creative Technology used to be such a great company 13 years ago. Now
    there are nothing but stinky-diarrhea-kakaa-foam-of-humans.

    I've asked them about Creative Music Synth [220] -- through a variety
    of means, including but not limited to phone, fax, and their online
    tech support -- only to be totally-ignored. I asked them about this
    for the past 5 years. Never got a decent answer. In addition, most of
    their online tech support is pre-written garbage.

    Creative Technology also uses such f--ked up sickening disgusting
    sample playback synths in their PCI cards.

    I wish that a gang of persons who support Creative Music Synth [220]
    would attack Creative Technology and force them to make hardware
    versions of Creative Music Synth [220] -- in PCI cards that are
    compatible with PCI slots and Windows XP -- upgraded from 16-bit to 64-
    bit-resolution and from 44.1 KHz to 2.88-Ghz-sample-rate. And from
    there, keep on upgrading! When XP and PCI are obsolete then Creative
    Technology should be forced to make even newer hardware versions of
    CMS220 -- with even wider bit-resolutions and higher sample-rates --
    that are compatible with the newer hardwares and softwares that will
    exist in that future time.

    If Creative Technology refuses, I hope the CMS220-advocating gang ties
    up the people who make up that company and torturously forces them to
    repeatedly listen to sample playback MIDI synths, softsynths,
    emulations, and soundfonts until those Creative personnel are annoyed
    with burning headaches and are deathly desperate for an escape. Only
    then will the people of Creative Technology do the right thing -- make
    upgraded versions of Creative Music Synth [220].

    A rich spoiled-rotten company like Creative deserves to be heinously
    hijacked and forced to do their duties.

    The least Creative Technology Ltd could do is put a *real* 64-bit-
    resolution, 2.88-Ghz-sample-rate, version of Creative Music Synth
    [220] in a PCI card. But noooooooooooooooooooooo! They are too f--king
    lazy.

    Its not just Creative Technology that's responsible. Its also the
    fault of self-destructive customers who don't mind paying $$$$$$$$$$$$$
    $$$$$$ for those crappy sample playback synths. F--k those customers
    as well. Masochistic perverts! I don't care if those customers destroy
    themselves. Though, I sure as f--k don't want them destroying me! Such
    customers should eat their own stinky diarrhea kakaa foam. If you feed
    a scum, then you're just as filthy as that scum and I sincerely hope
    you suffer just as much.

    I feel like torching the chips of soundfonts, softsynths, emulations,
    sample playback synths with oxyacetylene flames to distort their audio
    output.

    Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite MIDI synth.

    Its those sample playback synths that are crap.

    Sadly most MIDI magazines advertise the kakaa-stinky sample playback
    as a good thing often referring to them as 'wavetables'. These sick
    marketers call sample playback synthesis 'realistic sounding'.

    Sample playbacks synths are nothing more than the sound of a stinky
    fart emitted from a human colon.

    I've been looking hard for true FM synths. No luck. Most PCI cards
    have OPL emulation. I hate FM emulation. FM emulation -- much like any
    sample playback synthesis -- is to the ear what human kakaa is to the
    nose.

    I want *real* FM synthesis not some stinky trashy out-of-a-human-
    behind emulation.

    Those stinky-f==king marketers who refer to sample playback synthesis
    as 'wavetables' deserve to be thrown into the sewer and made to eat
    their own crap.

    There is a world of different between sample playback synthesis and
    wavetable synthesis.

    If you still believe the marketer-induced myth that wavetable
    synthesis and sample playback synthesis are the same thing, then
    please educate yourself with the hardcore scientific facts presented
    on the following link:

    http://www.musicdsp.org/files/Wavetable-101.pdf

    Wavetable synthesis is so much better than any kakaa-spitting sample
    playback synth but not nearly as heavenly as *true* FM synthesis. Of
    all the *true* FM synths, Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite.

    If a synth is *not*:

    1. *Real*

    AND

    2. *Digital*

    AND

    3. *Real-time*

    AND

    4. *Hardware*

    then it,
    STEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    For those of you who think MIDI is something of the past, there are
    many people who still care about MIDI but unfortunately, these are the
    sick f--ks who actually like sample playback MIDI synths, softsynths,
    emulations, and soundfonts.

    You are SOOOOO wrong if you think MIDI is obsolete. Its just that
    today's MIDI audio often takes the stinky sample playback MIDI synths,
    softsynths, emulations, and soundfonts. I feel like burning all sample
    playback MIDI synths, softsynths, emulations, and soundfonts along
    with their consumers, and their companies. Sick pieces of stinky thick
    diarrhea human kakaa foam they are. Vaporize all of those involved
    with nuclear-fusion flames!!!!!

    So yes. There plenty of those sample-playback-loving scumbags who
    still indulge in the evils of sample playback MIDI synths, softsynths,
    emulations, and soundfonts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Got it????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

    There are tons of evil lovers of sample playback MIDI synths,
    softsynths, emulations, and soundfonts in the entire world.

    Try visiting the newsgroups: comp.music.midi and alt.music.midi

    Majority of those sick f--ks continually hurl insults at Creative
    Music Synth [220] while praising sample playback MIDI synths,
    softsynths, emulations, and soundfonts. I feel like surrounding those
    scumslimes with superhot flames resulting from localized nuclear
    fusion.

    I would like to make some replicable magnetic electronic nanobots that
    will search for sample playback MIDI synths, softsynths, emulations,
    and soundfonts in any part of the world and attach to the digital
    chips of sample playback MIDI synths, softsynths, emulations, and
    soundfonts. These nanobots should contain magnetic receivers that will
    extract any random environmental magnetic audio signals from 2 kHz to
    50 kHz [excluding spikes, square-waves, white noise, brown noise, pink
    noise and bass sounds]. The nanobots then amplify those signals to the
    point where they would significantly interfere with -- and cause
    inductive crosstalk in -- the audio signals in the digital electronic
    chips of the sample playback MIDI synths, softsynths, emulations, and
    soundfonts. This will cause sample playback MIDI synths, softsynths,
    emulations, and soundfonts to be full of annoying -- and perhaps even
    frightening -- auditory disruptions from environmental magnetic
    interference**.

    That way all companies will be forced to abandon all their sample
    playback MIDI synths, softsynths, emulations, and soundfonts. In
    addition, all listeners will be forced to endure the pollution of
    sample playback MIDI synths, softsynths, emulations, and soundfonts.

    For those who miss their stinky human kakaa foam of soundfonts,
    emulations, and sample playback synths, well, f--k them!

    Voila! No more sample playback MIDI.

    I demand that MIDI either use CMS220, or that MIDI audio not be used
    at all.

    Death to MIDI other than Creative Music Synth [220].

    All sample playback MIDI synths, softsynths, emulations, and
    soundfonts must be burned badly. That way those involved in MIDI audio
    will not have much choice other than to listen to [or produce]:
    1. Creative Music Synth [220]
    2. Digital FM synths other than Creative Music Synth [220]
    3. *Real* wavetables
    4. Other digital synths [excluding emulations, soundfonts, and sample
    playback]
    5. Analog synths

    OR, the other option for those sample-playback-loving, emulation-
    supporting, soundfont-advocating, softsynth-desiring f--kheads is to
    totally give up on MIDI, get depressed -- due to the absence of sample
    playback MIDI synths, softsynths, emulations, and soundfonts, and jump
    off a cliff!!!!

    I'll see to it that revenge is mine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    **Note: The magnetic signals that interfere with those digital chips
    should be purely-analog. I just love it when purely-analog magnetic
    signals cause significant disruptions in purely-digital chip-based
    parts of electronic devices that I don't like. Sample playback MIDI
    synths, softsynths, emulations, and soundfonts are an example of
    digital electronic devices that I don't like so I want to victimize
    them in this manner -- i.e. via magnetic interferences.

    I try playing Creative Music Synth [220], through my so called
    'karaoke voice canceller' -- which inverts the phase of one stereo
    channel [right or left] and then combines it the other channel --
    which results in anything identical in both the left and right
    channels being removed. I get a mono of what was different in the left
    and right channels.

    When I play Creative Music Synth [220] audio through the voice-
    canceller, it sounds more treble, sharper, brighter, warmer, and
    crisper than when I don't use the voice canceller.

    Due to the above, my MIDI synth dream would be a mono, 64-bit-
    resolution, 2.88-Ghz-sample-rate, version of Creative Music Synth
    [220] based on the signals that were phased differently in the
    original CMS220. CMS220 is a stereo FM synth who left and right
    signals are phased differently, this is why I get a different sound
    when I play throught voice-canceller. The signals of CMS220 that have
    the same phase for both L and R have a more cheesy sine-wave quality
    which I don't care for. The signals in CMS220 that are phased
    differently in L and R tend to resemble a fresher sawtooth-wave
    quality which I like. That is why I want my version of CMS220 to be
    based on the sounds that were phased differently in the original
    CMS220. I want my version to be monoaural because I want all speakers
    to give out the same signal.

    Try listening to a sample playback MIDI synth -- such as SoundMax's
    MIDI synth -- and compare that to Creative Music Synth [220]. You'll
    *definitely* notice the difference.

    SoundMax MIDI synth audio is to the ear what stinky thick diarrhea
    kakaa foam of humans is to the nose.

    The Crystal soundfont is even worse than SoundMax.

    Creative Music Synth [220], OTOH, is auditory paradise.

    Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly
    appreciated.


    Thanks,

    Radium
     
  2. Michael

    Michael Guest

    I'm afraid all I can offer is astonishment, indiscreet laughter, and my
    earnest suggestion that you seek treatment - *soon*.

    Will that do?
     
  3. Radium

    Radium Guest

    Yeah right. Whats treatment gonna do? Change my auditory perception so
    I'll stop noticing the difference between the heavenly CMS220 and
    those hellish softsynths? I am afraid, that such is impossible, given
    the state of today's technology.
    Sadly, no.
     
  4. Michael

    Michael Guest

    Allow you to finally move beyond your present anal-stage-arrested
    development.
    Who cares about that? I sure don't. Like what you like, hate what you
    hate. No skin off my nose.

    It's your offensive and socially poisonous scatological compulsions that you
    should be trying to change.

    Get help.
     
  5. Mr.T

    Mr.T Guest

    ....Trots out the same old TROLL once more, to prove he is deaf and insane.

    Interesting story in a local magazine about a person still watching his 50
    year old black and white television every night. (And he spends far more on
    repairs than buying a new color TV by the way.)
    A friend of Radium's perhaps :)

    MrT.
     
  6. Mark Jerde

    Mark Jerde Guest

    I would appreciate a *short* summary of the problem(s) you're trying to
    solve. I don't understand your point(s) from a quick look-see at your post.

    -- Mark
     
  7. Radium

    Radium Guest

    The problem is that Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite
    soundcard MIDI synth because of its audio quality. My PC is the only
    PC that contains SB16 ISA -- which contains CMS220 chip. Currently, my
    CMS220 works fine, however, due to the laws of physics, its circuits
    are eventually going to breakdown in my lifetime. I don't want that.
    If my CMS220 loses its circuits due to old age, I want a replacement
    or repair. But no one will do that. No one will repair the CMS220 or
    replace it with an exact replica. Instead -- being the sadistic turds
    they are -- they will tell me to get a new sound card. Today's sound
    cards contain soundfonts, softsynths, emulations, or sample playback
    MIDI synths -- all of which I truly hate. So if my ISA soundcard
    breaks, I am screwed. I hate this situation.

    In addition, I would like an upgrade of my existing CMS220. The
    upgrade should be based on the signals that are phased differently in
    my current CMS220.

    I try playing Creative Music Synth [220], through my so called
    'karaoke voice canceller' -- which inverts the phase of one stereo
    channel [right or left] and then combines it the other channel --
    which results in anything identical in both the left and right
    channels being removed. I get a mono of what was different in the left
    and right channels.

    When I play Creative Music Synth [220] audio through the voice-
    canceller, it sounds more treble, sharper, brighter, warmer, and
    crisper than when I don't use the voice canceller. I like such
    qualities.

    So, my MIDI synth dream would be a mono, 64-bit-resolution, 2.88-Ghz-
    sample-rate, version of Creative Music Synth [220] based on the
    signals that were phased differently in the original CMS220. CMS220 is
    a stereo FM synth who left and right signals are phased differently,
    this is why I get a different sound when I play throught voice-
    canceller. The signals of CMS220 that have the same phase for both L
    and R have a more cheesy sine-wave quality which I don't care for. The
    signals in CMS220 that are phased differently in L and R tend to
    resemble a fresher sawtooth-wave quality which I like. That is why I
    want my version of CMS220 to be based on the sounds that were phased
    differently in the original CMS220. I want my version to be monoaural
    because I want all speakers to give out the same signal.
     
  8. dave king

    dave king Guest

    Perhaps you should board the next spaceship to the planet ZOG. I
    believe that they have an abundance of CMS220's there. The last WPIS
    radio talk show broadcast from there that I heard claimed that they were
    now attempting to connect them in a hypercube configuration to beam ESP
    sound waves to the inhabitants of the planet Xsorus. This will enable
    them to teach their pet gerbils to sing...

    Albert, how am I doing, I am an amateur at this but perhaps there is a
    future for me ;>>
     
  9. contrex

    contrex Guest

    Radium's crap is clearly caused by brain rot due to excessive
    masturbation.
     
  10. Mr.T

    Mr.T Guest

    Either that or too much listening to 4 op FM synth crap has addled his
    brain.
    Or he simply gets his jollies throwing a dead fish in the water, and
    watching the sea gulls fight over it :)

    (BTW the 220 simply refers to the PC port address, Radium doesn't seem to
    have worked that out yet after 100's of troll posts :)

    MrT.
     
  11. Sorry guys, forgery.

    Bob Morein
    Dresher, PA
    (215) 646-4894
     
  12. contrex

    contrex Guest

    Why doesn't he fire up his soldering iron and make himself a synth if
    he's so bloody clever?
     
  13. Mr.T

    Mr.T Guest

    What makes you think he is clever?

    MrT.
     
  14. His troll has been remarkably successful this time round :)
     
  15. contrex

    contrex Guest

    In sarcastic usage, one reads "if he's so clever" as "if he's as
    clever as he clearly thinks he is".
     

  16. Yea, and after all that grunting and sweat stained carpet, bleeding
    blisters on both hands, a gross of worn out tweezers and still no
    results? What do you really expect from a substandard troll?


    --
    Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
    prove it.
    Member of DAV #85.

    Michael A. Terrell
    Central Florida
     

  17. A troll by any other name is still only good for the compost pile.


    --
    Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
    prove it.
    Member of DAV #85.

    Michael A. Terrell
    Central Florida
     
  18. Peter Larsen

    Peter Larsen Guest

    If you want your posts read, then you have to stop making the same
    posts. Please find a new issue of concern and please post to relevant
    newsgroups only.

    Regards

    Peter Larsen
     
  19. Mogens V.

    Mogens V. Guest

    Well, maybe a somewhat shorter, condensed, edited posting without very
    personel expressions, in a more to-the-fact style might help.

    Might also be helpful posting specifics to related NG's, instead of
    Xposting it all to five ones.
     
  20. Glennbo

    Glennbo Guest

    In the killer
    Here's *LOTS* of them. Stock yourself up for the rest of your life,
    and find something more important to freek yourself out about. ;)

    http://search.ebay.com/Soundblaster...2QQsbrftogZ1QQsofocusZbsQQsubmitsearchZSearch

    --
    Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email
    ________ ____
    / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____
    / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \
    / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ /
    \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-