J
JeffM
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
....and it's been that way for MANY years.qrk said:Not at all. I'm suggesting that Symantec has crappy apps
that create enough problems to make your computing experience
a pain in the glutious maximus.
Mine has been the polar opposite.My past experience with ZA (a decade ago) was horrid.
I still see many tales of woe *attributed* to ZoneAlarm.Perhaps ZA is much improved.
M$'s crapware DOES NOT filter EGRESS trafficAnyway, if you have XP, the built-in firewall works fine
(contrary to the MAIN reason to have a *software* firewall).
If you get infected from a CDand you don't need all these silly firewall addins.
(ostensibly benign trojans are common in commercial software)[1]
and are running M$'s "software firewall",
outbound traffic from that infection will pass unchallenged.
If you install an app that constantly tries to "phone home"[1],
this will NEVER be flagged by M$'s garbage "firewall".
ALL OTHER software firewalls intercept outbound packets.
Now ask yourself:
WHY IS ONLY REDMOND'S STUFF CRIPPLED?
If you have a router (a hardware firewall) between you and the 'Net,
M$'s crapware is redundant and just burns cycles needlessly.
..
..
[1] You'd be shocked at the number of people
who report "mainstream" apps pulling this crap.