Maker Pro
Maker Pro

messing with the power connection

K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
| In article <[email protected]>, phil-news-
| [email protected] says...
|>
|> Really? You make up some concept about quotation marks and think it relates
|> to invention vs. innovation, and just expect people to read your mind?
|
| No, I expect people here to be half-literate.

So then don't make stuff up.

Have you ever looked in a mirror, Phil. ...or did they all shatter?
 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
phil-news- said:
| MANY here have. Apparently it flies way over your head. ...or
| perhaps through your ears.

Let's see ... you, Michael A. Terrell, and that bud-- person. People that
don't speak specific. Ooooh ... I'm so impressed ... not.

You can lead an ass to information, but you can't make him listen.
 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
|> There's only about 6 of you I've seen on the whole Usenet.
|
| Crap, Phil! You oughta get your eyes checked. I only see one
| MikeT.

The "you" is the general class of people that are acting like jerks.
You ([email protected]) are one of them. There's the bud guy here.
The rest are in other newsgroups.

You can't get away with being a know-nothing "expert" and get away
with it, so you sob in the corner like a little girl. Grow up!
 
| In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
| says...
|>
|> |> There's only about 6 of you I've seen on the whole Usenet.
|> |
|> | Crap, Phil! You oughta get your eyes checked. I only see one
|> | MikeT.
|>
|> The "you" is the general class of people that are acting like jerks.
|> You ([email protected]) are one of them. There's the bud guy here.
|> The rest are in other newsgroups.
|
| You can't get away with being a know-nothing "expert" and get away
| with it, so you sob in the corner like a little girl. Grow up!

Huh? Your creative imagination is still driving you to making posts
that have no basis in fact or logic.
 
| [email protected] wrote:
|>
|> I don't see anyone backing up YOUR wild claims. In fact, it is very rare
|> that anyone does a followup to say "yeah, that guy is right, I back him up
|> with his wild claims". Even take "wild" out of that sentence, and there
|> is no common practice of such. That's the way it has been on Usenet since
|> I started using it in 1986.
|
|
| Rare, as opposed to you never being backed up?

Lots of discussions have been carried out where people discuss things that
have posted. They don't need to point out that I was right. They know it
and followed through. If I was wrong, they had the chance to challenge
and did not.

As I said before, I challenge YOU to post a followup to my posts that do
not follow you, stating exactly the specific error I make. Try it!
 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
phil-news- said:
| In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
| says...
|>
|> |> There's only about 6 of you I've seen on the whole Usenet.
|> |
|> | Crap, Phil! You oughta get your eyes checked. I only see one
|> | MikeT.
|>
|> The "you" is the general class of people that are acting like jerks.
|> You ([email protected]) are one of them. There's the bud guy here.
|> The rest are in other newsgroups.
|
| You can't get away with being a know-nothing "expert" and get away
| with it, so you sob in the corner like a little girl. Grow up!

Huh? Your creative imagination is still driving you to making posts
that have no basis in fact or logic.

Well, if we don't have Pa' Kettle here. Phil, you really are
becoming tiring.
 
| In article <[email protected]>, phil-news-
| [email protected] says...
|> | In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
|> | says...
|> |>
|> |> |> There's only about 6 of you I've seen on the whole Usenet.
|> |> |
|> |> | Crap, Phil! You oughta get your eyes checked. I only see one
|> |> | MikeT.
|> |>
|> |> The "you" is the general class of people that are acting like jerks.
|> |> You ([email protected]) are one of them. There's the bud guy here.
|> |> The rest are in other newsgroups.
|> |
|> | You can't get away with being a know-nothing "expert" and get away
|> | with it, so you sob in the corner like a little girl. Grow up!
|>
|> Huh? Your creative imagination is still driving you to making posts
|> that have no basis in fact or logic.
|
| Well, if we don't have Pa' Kettle here. Phil, you really are
| becoming tiring.

Will you tire of me, or tire of posting, first?
 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
phil-news- said:
| In article <[email protected]>, phil-news-
| [email protected] says...
|> | In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
|> | says...
|> |>
|> |> |> There's only about 6 of you I've seen on the whole Usenet.
|> |> |
|> |> | Crap, Phil! You oughta get your eyes checked. I only see one
|> |> | MikeT.
|> |>
|> |> The "you" is the general class of people that are acting like jerks.
|> |> You ([email protected]) are one of them. There's the bud guy here.
|> |> The rest are in other newsgroups.
|> |
|> | You can't get away with being a know-nothing "expert" and get away
|> | with it, so you sob in the corner like a little girl. Grow up!
|>
|> Huh? Your creative imagination is still driving you to making posts
|> that have no basis in fact or logic.
|
| Well, if we don't have Pa' Kettle here. Phil, you really are
| becoming tiring.

Will you tire of me, or tire of posting, first?

You. ...some time back.
 
| In article <[email protected]>, phil-news-
| [email protected] says...
|> | In article <[email protected]>, phil-news-
|> | [email protected] says...
|> |> | In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
|> |> | says...
|> |> |>
|> |> |> |> There's only about 6 of you I've seen on the whole Usenet.
|> |> |> |
|> |> |> | Crap, Phil! You oughta get your eyes checked. I only see one
|> |> |> | MikeT.
|> |> |>
|> |> |> The "you" is the general class of people that are acting like jerks.
|> |> |> You ([email protected]) are one of them. There's the bud guy here.
|> |> |> The rest are in other newsgroups.
|> |> |
|> |> | You can't get away with being a know-nothing "expert" and get away
|> |> | with it, so you sob in the corner like a little girl. Grow up!
|> |>
|> |> Huh? Your creative imagination is still driving you to making posts
|> |> that have no basis in fact or logic.
|> |
|> | Well, if we don't have Pa' Kettle here. Phil, you really are
|> | becoming tiring.
|>
|> Will you tire of me, or tire of posting, first?
|
| You. ...some time back.

Then maybe you should cease reading my posts. Afterall, they provide you
would no value whatsoever.
 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
phil-news- said:
| In article <[email protected]>, phil-news-
| [email protected] says...
|> | In article <[email protected]>, phil-news-
|> | [email protected] says...
|> |> | In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
|> |> | says...
|> |> |>
|> |> |> |> There's only about 6 of you I've seen on the whole Usenet.
|> |> |> |
|> |> |> | Crap, Phil! You oughta get your eyes checked. I only see one
|> |> |> | MikeT.
|> |> |>
|> |> |> The "you" is the general class of people that are acting like jerks.
|> |> |> You ([email protected]) are one of them. There's the bud guy here.
|> |> |> The rest are in other newsgroups.
|> |> |
|> |> | You can't get away with being a know-nothing "expert" and get away
|> |> | with it, so you sob in the corner like a little girl. Grow up!
|> |>
|> |> Huh? Your creative imagination is still driving you to making posts
|> |> that have no basis in fact or logic.
|> |
|> | Well, if we don't have Pa' Kettle here. Phil, you really are
|> | becoming tiring.
|>
|> Will you tire of me, or tire of posting, first?
|
| You. ...some time back.

Then maybe you should cease reading my posts. Afterall, they provide you
would no value whatsoever.

Give the man a cigar!
 
Top