Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Matched resistors

S

Stefan Heinzmann

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi all,

I was wondering whether one can make any assumptions on how well
resistors are matched in a resistor network. It is quite convenient
nowadays to buy little SMD resistor networks with 4 independent
resistors of equal value. The tolerance usually is 5% or 1%, but maybe
the matching between resistors of the same package is actually better,
since they're manufactured together.

So the question is: Do I have a reasonable chance to have better
matching in a resistor network than in separate resistors with the same
tolerance?

Obviously, it depends on the manufacturing method whether this is true
or not. If it is similar to IC fabrication, the matching will be much
better than the absolute accuracy.

As you probably know well, the absolute accuracy is not important in
some applications as long as you have good matching.

Cheers
Stefan
 
C

Charles DH Williams

Jan 1, 1970
0
I was wondering whether one can make any assumptions on how well
resistors are matched in a resistor network.

The rule is simple: Assume nothing that is not stated explicitly
on the specification sheet.

Charles
 
F

Fred Bartoli

Jan 1, 1970
0
Stefan Heinzmann said:
Hi all,

I was wondering whether one can make any assumptions on how well
resistors are matched in a resistor network. It is quite convenient
nowadays to buy little SMD resistor networks with 4 independent
resistors of equal value. The tolerance usually is 5% or 1%, but maybe
the matching between resistors of the same package is actually better,
since they're manufactured together.

So the question is: Do I have a reasonable chance to have better
matching in a resistor network than in separate resistors with the same
tolerance?

Obviously, it depends on the manufacturing method whether this is true
or not. If it is similar to IC fabrication, the matching will be much
better than the absolute accuracy.

As you probably know well, the absolute accuracy is not important in
some applications as long as you have good matching.

I think you can assume absolutely nothing because the resistors are first
made under the value then ajusted by a laser cut.

The only good thing is that you'll have better temperature matching since
Al2O3 thermal conductivity is very good and the chip is quite small.

It's just time to take a few dozen chips and help yourself.


Fred.
 
J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi all,

I was wondering whether one can make any assumptions on how well
resistors are matched in a resistor network. It is quite convenient
nowadays to buy little SMD resistor networks with 4 independent
resistors of equal value. The tolerance usually is 5% or 1%, but maybe
the matching between resistors of the same package is actually better,
since they're manufactured together.

So the question is: Do I have a reasonable chance to have better
matching in a resistor network than in separate resistors with the same
tolerance?

Probably so. The materials and substrate are identical, and the same
laser trimmer was used to tweak both. Thinfilms are likely to be
better than thick.
Obviously, it depends on the manufacturing method whether this is true
or not. If it is similar to IC fabrication, the matching will be much
better than the absolute accuracy.

As you probably know well, the absolute accuracy is not important in
some applications as long as you have good matching.

Cheers
Stefan

I've seen people take an 8-resistor network and use interleaved
resistors in series to make two resistors of 4R each. The claim is
that the tolerances are better and the TC matching is much better.

Lots of people are now making thinfilm-on-silicon networks that are
guaranteed to match well. The SOT-23s are cool.

John
 
B

Bill Sloman

Jan 1, 1970
0
Stefan Heinzmann said:
Hi all,

I was wondering whether one can make any assumptions on how well
resistors are matched in a resistor network. It is quite convenient
nowadays to buy little SMD resistor networks with 4 independent
resistors of equal value. The tolerance usually is 5% or 1%, but maybe
the matching between resistors of the same package is actually better,
since they're manufactured together.

So the question is: Do I have a reasonable chance to have better
matching in a resistor network than in separate resistors with the same
tolerance?

Obviously, it depends on the manufacturing method whether this is true
or not. If it is similar to IC fabrication, the matching will be much
better than the absolute accuracy.

As you probably know well, the absolute accuracy is not important in
some applications as long as you have good matching.

You can make all the assumptions you like, or you can buy a thin film
precision resistor network from Vishay - the RMKMS816 series offers
+/-0.1% absolute tolerance and matching, +/-5ppm/C tracking and
+/-10ppm/C absolute stability. Farnell stocks 100R, 1k, 10k and 100k
arrays, and you can presumably buy specific values from Vishay, though
you will probably have to accept a minimum order quantity of several
hundred parts.
 
K

Kevin Kilzer

Jan 1, 1970
0
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 23:01:15 +0100, Stefan Heinzmann

So the question is: Do I have a reasonable chance to have better
matching in a resistor network than in separate resistors with the same
tolerance?

You at least have a better chance that the ratio between two is very
consistent. One advantage of (un-trimmed) thick-film is that the
resistor values are determined by geometry: the length and width is
determined by the mask, and the thickness by the squeegee that laid
the ink.

Clearly, the mask is dimensionally stable during the manufacturing,
and since the two resistors are close, the sqeegee should have laid
down about the same thickness of ink on the same device. The sqeegee
process can vary from device-to-device, and especially between
manufacturing lots.

This was one of the selling points in the early 70's when thick-film
resistor arrays were first marketed. Thin-film is similar, but a
different process.

Kevin
 
S

Spehro Pefhany

Jan 1, 1970
0
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 23:01:15 +0100, Stefan Heinzmann



You at least have a better chance that the ratio between two is very
consistent. One advantage of (un-trimmed) thick-film is that the
resistor values are determined by geometry: the length and width is
determined by the mask, and the thickness by the squeegee that laid
the ink.

Clearly, the mask is dimensionally stable during the manufacturing,
and since the two resistors are close, the sqeegee should have laid
down about the same thickness of ink on the same device. The sqeegee
process can vary from device-to-device, and especially between
manufacturing lots.

This was one of the selling points in the early 70's when thick-film
resistor arrays were first marketed. Thin-film is similar, but a
different process.

I checked a couple and the variation between them was as bad as the
variation from nominal value (some high and some low). They were quite
close to nominal, however.

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
 
C

Chris

Jan 1, 1970
0
Stefan Heinzmann said:
Hi all,

I was wondering whether one can make any assumptions on how well
resistors are matched in a resistor network. It is quite convenient
nowadays to buy little SMD resistor networks with 4 independent
resistors of equal value. The tolerance usually is 5% or 1%, but maybe
the matching between resistors of the same package is actually better,
since they're manufactured together.

So the question is: Do I have a reasonable chance to have better
matching in a resistor network than in separate resistors with the same
tolerance?

Obviously, it depends on the manufacturing method whether this is true
or not. If it is similar to IC fabrication, the matching will be much
better than the absolute accuracy.

As you probably know well, the absolute accuracy is not important in
some applications as long as you have good matching.

Cheers
Stefan

Hi, Stefan. Your assumption is fairly common, and unfortunately, not
a good one. Screened thick film, even in its cured state, is not
homogeneous. When it is trimmed, the intense localized heat of the
laser leads to very significant temperature gradients, which causes
unrelieved mechanical stresses within the film near the cuts and a
phenomenon called microcracking. Microscopic radial cracks, which
extend out from the length of the laser cut, and also out from the
edge of the cut, are areas of weakness on the surface of the resistor.
These are actually one of the main limiting factors in trying to get
precise tolerances on thick film, and why tolerances better than 0.5%
are usually very expensive and custom-order only. By using premium
non-blended inks and trimming at slower rates with less power, you can
help to minimize this problem, but it will always be there. No
manufacturer of thick film is going to cut laser throughput to 1/2 to
1/5 of normal rate (pretty standard with resistor matching to 0.1%
tolerance) to meet an unspecified requirement. The microcracking
effect is usually responsible for drift up, and is usually less than
0.5%, so the trim shop will just target a little on the low side, and
run subs through as fast as possible to meet spec.

One thing you might want to try to illustrate this problem is to pick
out a few 5% SIP resistor networks having two resistors which measure
nearly identical ohms. Write down the values, then put them on rated
wattage a few times for a couple of minutes, allowing them to cool
after each time, and then measure them again. Your identical
resistors on the 5% SIP may not be identical any more, and will likely
have somewhat different values than initial readings. With thermal
cycling, the thermal expansion/contraction cycles will tend to extend
the microcracking, causing the resistance value to increase just like
extending the laser cut. (Remember that this problem is separate from
the issue of thermal coefficient of expansion differences between the
thick film and the substrate, which can be greatly reduced with
premium inks and good process engineering). Again, since thick film
by nature is not homogeneous, this will vary from resistor to
resistor, even on the same sub with resistors right next to each
other. The effect can be minimized by using very conservative loading
of the SIPs or SMT parts, and also by handling the parts with care
(mechanical shock also extends microcracking, much less of a problem
with the smaller SMT parts) and minimizing the amount of heat applied
to the parts during soldering.

Another respondent suggested using thin film precision-matched
resistors, and that sounds like a better idea, if you want a
"for-certain" engineered solution. If you want a hack on matched
resistors, grab a handful of 1% units, and cycle them at rated wattage
a few times to age the thick film. If they're high resistance and
rated wattage is impractical, set your oven for 120 degrees C, put
them on a baking pan, and put them in and out of the oven a few times,
allowing them to cool completely after each removal. Then measure
resistance, and sort out your best matches. This isn't by any means a
guaranteed method, but I guess it's better than nothing.

Good luck
Chris
 
S

Stefan Heinzmann

Jan 1, 1970
0
Chris said:
Hi, Stefan. Your assumption is fairly common, and unfortunately, not
a good one. Screened thick film, even in its cured state, is not
homogeneous. When it is trimmed, the intense localized heat of the
laser leads to very significant temperature gradients, which causes
unrelieved mechanical stresses within the film near the cuts and a
phenomenon called microcracking. Microscopic radial cracks, which
extend out from the length of the laser cut, and also out from the
edge of the cut, are areas of weakness on the surface of the resistor.
These are actually one of the main limiting factors in trying to get
precise tolerances on thick film, and why tolerances better than 0.5%
are usually very expensive and custom-order only. By using premium
non-blended inks and trimming at slower rates with less power, you can
help to minimize this problem, but it will always be there. No
manufacturer of thick film is going to cut laser throughput to 1/2 to
1/5 of normal rate (pretty standard with resistor matching to 0.1%
tolerance) to meet an unspecified requirement. The microcracking
effect is usually responsible for drift up, and is usually less than
0.5%, so the trim shop will just target a little on the low side, and
run subs through as fast as possible to meet spec.

One thing you might want to try to illustrate this problem is to pick
out a few 5% SIP resistor networks having two resistors which measure
nearly identical ohms. Write down the values, then put them on rated
wattage a few times for a couple of minutes, allowing them to cool
after each time, and then measure them again. Your identical
resistors on the 5% SIP may not be identical any more, and will likely
have somewhat different values than initial readings. With thermal
cycling, the thermal expansion/contraction cycles will tend to extend
the microcracking, causing the resistance value to increase just like
extending the laser cut. (Remember that this problem is separate from
the issue of thermal coefficient of expansion differences between the
thick film and the substrate, which can be greatly reduced with
premium inks and good process engineering). Again, since thick film
by nature is not homogeneous, this will vary from resistor to
resistor, even on the same sub with resistors right next to each
other. The effect can be minimized by using very conservative loading
of the SIPs or SMT parts, and also by handling the parts with care
(mechanical shock also extends microcracking, much less of a problem
with the smaller SMT parts) and minimizing the amount of heat applied
to the parts during soldering.

Another respondent suggested using thin film precision-matched
resistors, and that sounds like a better idea, if you want a
"for-certain" engineered solution. If you want a hack on matched
resistors, grab a handful of 1% units, and cycle them at rated wattage
a few times to age the thick film. If they're high resistance and
rated wattage is impractical, set your oven for 120 degrees C, put
them on a baking pan, and put them in and out of the oven a few times,
allowing them to cool completely after each removal. Then measure
resistance, and sort out your best matches. This isn't by any means a
guaranteed method, but I guess it's better than nothing.

Good one! That was the kind of answer I was hoping for. Thanks Chris!

Looks as if I wanted to be clever and get something for free. At least I
know now more about the details of resistor construction.

Since you seem to know a lot about it, let me ask another question:
Depending on construction, some resistors seem to be noisier than
others. This excess noise appears to be related to joints or
discontinuities between materials. While reading your text it occurred
to me that these microcracks could also be a source of such excess
noise, particularly when the resistor is thermally excercised. Is that true?

Cheers
Stefan
 
Top