E
Eeyore
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Fred said:Well how many people have that lame "rabbitsfirendsandidiots" email?
What's that got to do with posting through Google ?
I have NEVER had an account terminated.
Graham
Fred said:Well how many people have that lame "rabbitsfirendsandidiots" email?
Eeyore said:Fred Bloggs wrote:
What's that got to do with posting through Google ?
I have NEVER had an account terminated.
Graham
Fred said:Of course you're going to say that, it's part and parcel with your
psychosis.
The data is filed under "climate change"
Martin
Eeyore said:Fred Bloggs wrote:
I suggest you find even a single example of me posting through Google. Should be
easy enough. Google has extensive records AIUI.
If you can't then SHUT UP.
As for psychosis you're apparently the expert, having magicked up some mythical
google account you imagine I have.
Graham
Fred said:Martin Griffith a écrit:
Does this mean that "climate change" is just one of the current noises?
Fred said:Typical schizoid response, this is too classic...
Right, otherwise known as thermoelectric effect. You can make a pretty
good people detector using that.
"John Larkin About Fuckwit TROLL "
** A blind man's opinion of the view.
** Yawn ............
** So the trolling, autistic fool has no experience to draw from.
** A blind man's opinion of the view.
It all looks dark to him.
....... Phil
I wonder how many measurements of resistor "excess noise" are
confounded by these other effects. A bunch, I'd bet. That would help
explain why the measurements seem to be so inconsistant.
If there's voltage across them, some may have "excess noise",
which should in theory be very small for metal film resistors.
I've
tried to measure the excess noise of various expensive (thin film) and
dirt-cheap (cermet and carbon film) resistors, without success; they
all seem the same.
Le Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:09:54 +0200, Martin Griffith a écrit:
Does this mean that "climate change" is just one of the current noises?
I've done experiments to measure excess noise on a variety of
resistors, and never resolved any noise-versus-bias voltage effects...
Phil said:** Any LYING fool can claim any damn stupid thing.
"John Larkin Autistic FUCKING MORON "
** Any LYING fool can claim any damn stupid thing.
There is any amount of credible literature on the topic.
Try reading up on maker's specs for a start
- YOU VILE ASD FUCKED FUCKWIT !!!
...... Phil
"John Larkin Fucking MORON "
** A blind man's opinion of the view.
** So the trolling, autistic fool has no experience to draw from.
** A blind man's opinion of the view.
It all looks dark to him.
....... Phil
John said:I've done experiments to measure excess noise on a variety of
resistors, and never resolved any noise-versus-bias voltage effects
with a measurement floor close to Johnson. What have you done?
John
John said:Ah, you read about life instead of living it.
I gave an answer to this on another NG; DigiKey carries a brand thatWhat type of resistors are low noise resistors? i am using surface
mount (SMD) resistors. I learnt that there are thick film and thin
film resistors. Which types of SMD resistors have lowest noise? kindly
enlighten on this.
Thanks
Kristo
Where did you get that bit of mis-information? Metal film SMD resistors
are usually good enough.
The trick to low noise design is mostly a matter of decoupling or
mis-matching the noise sources in a circuit. I've made amplifiers with
300pV/rt(Hz) input-referred noise and 50 Ohm input resistance, despite
opinions that one could never get below about 0.5nV/rt(Hz) in a wideband
matched system.