Connect with us

lm3914n

Discussion in 'Electronic Basics' started by Colin Dawson, Apr 20, 2004.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. Colin Dawson

    Colin Dawson Guest

    Hi all.

    I'm finally getting round to finishing my bar graph display that I started a
    few weeks ago. The circuit that Fred Bloggs sent was a great start and I've
    done a minor tweek to it, to save on resisters. You'll find the circuit
    diagram at

    http://www.cjdawson76.btinternet.co.uk/circuits/PowerIndicator.jpg

    Basically, the tweeks that I've made to the circuit are to remove 10 * 1K
    Resisters that were in series with each of the LED's. Then I've changed R14
    from 1.5K to 6.8K which reduces the current drawn into the chip. Other
    than that there's been no change.

    Now for the problem. If I run the circuit in Bar mode (SW2 closed)
    everything works perfectly, as you'd expect.
    When I change to Dot mode (SW2 open) a strange thing happens. If the chip
    was displaying more than one LED in bar mode then the correct LED is
    illuminated as you'd expect. BUT... D10 is also partially illuminated!!!!!

    How can I stop D10 more illuminating unless it is supposed to be?

    Thanks in advance for the Help

    Colin.
     
  2. Colin Dawson

    Colin Dawson Guest


    I sorted it!!!! :) I think I'm beggining to get the hang of it again
    ;-)

    Here's what I did. First of all I changed R14 to 3K9 This has increased the
    brightness. It's also well within the capability of the chip.

    Next I added a 5k resister, this is connected to the 12V supply and pin 1 on
    the chip (LED 1 Output). When running in bar mode, the first LED to light
    will be a little dimmer than the others, but this is not noticable. When I
    switch to DOT mode and one of the other LED's is lit, the chip will draw a
    few hundred microamps, the resister will then come into play and use some of
    that power meaning that the LED won't light up. Which is much more
    astheticly pleasing overall :)

    Regards

    Colin.
     
  3. UncleWobbly

    UncleWobbly Guest

    Colin... hope you are well...

    I may be missing sunnik but from the circuit you show, it is possible to
    short your DCin to ground through VR1. Mal-adjustment of VR1 might allow
    harm to whatever is providing your signal. You might like to put and
    "endstop" resistor between the ground-end of VR1 and ground just to limit
    current draw when VR1 is at zero... R11 will prevent shorting to vRef at the
    other end of VR1.

    just a consideration.
     
  4. Colin Dawson

    Colin Dawson Guest

    Hi, yes you are missing something....

    The 5.1V, DCin and Gnd0 terminals are a seperate circuit on the Velleman
    K8004 Pulse Width Modulator circuit.
    These three terminals between them provide a method of manually controlling
    the pulse width. If the DCIn does does get shorted to ground, it will
    signal the circuit to provide a pusle width of 0%. Basically, turning the
    whole thing off.

    If DCin was shorted to 5.1v then the circuit would set the pulse width to
    100%. I don't think there's a major issue with either scenario. I'd just
    need to replace the damaged component, and nothing else will suffer from
    that. It might even be possible to remove C5 and c4 completely. But I'm
    not, as I'd rather have them than damage the chip.

    Regards

    Col.
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
Loading...
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-