Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Line Voltage Sensing

L

Lord Inexorx

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi,

i need to sense the line voltage(duh!). My set-up is basically a two
resistor divider across the L & N. The lower resistor is sized such that
I get an approx. 4V peak-peak over it. A difference amplifier is
connected across this resistor with a gain of approx. 1. Theoretically
I'm suppose to get a replica of the mains voltage waveform. But, after
building the circuit the output tends to be almost a square wave. Supply
to the cct is +/-15v. The square wave peaks are hitting the supply rail.
Any ideas how i could remedy this problem?
 
L

Lord Inexorx

Jan 1, 1970
0
Lord said:
Hi,

i need to sense the line voltage(duh!). My set-up is basically a two
resistor divider across the L & N. The lower resistor is sized such that
I get an approx. 4V peak-peak over it. A difference amplifier is
connected across this resistor with a gain of approx. 1. Theoretically
I'm suppose to get a replica of the mains voltage waveform. But, after
building the circuit the output tends to be almost a square wave. Supply
to the cct is +/-15v. The square wave peaks are hitting the supply rail.
Any ideas how i could remedy this problem?

Sorry, what i meant was i'm suppose to get a scaled down replica of the
mains voltage waveform.
 
M

Mac

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi,

i need to sense the line voltage(duh!). My set-up is basically a two
resistor divider across the L & N. The lower resistor is sized such that
I get an approx. 4V peak-peak over it. A difference amplifier is
connected across this resistor with a gain of approx. 1. Theoretically
I'm suppose to get a replica of the mains voltage waveform. But, after
building the circuit the output tends to be almost a square wave. Supply
to the cct is +/-15v. The square wave peaks are hitting the supply rail.
Any ideas how i could remedy this problem?

Can you post a link to a schematic?

--Mac
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"Lord Inexorx"
i need to sense the line voltage(duh!). My set-up is basically a two
resistor divider across the L & N. The lower resistor is sized such that I
get an approx. 4V peak-peak over it. A difference amplifier is connected
across this resistor with a gain of approx. 1.


** That is a stupid and dangerous arrangement.

If the neutral connection ever comes loose, your IC will be subjected to 230
volts AC and likely destroyed.

The better and foolproof way is to use a small step down transformer -
toroidal for best waveform accuracy.

Or at least, a differencing stage PROPERLY designed to accept 230 volts AC
input with and the desired voltage reduction ratio.



........ Phil
 
Lord said:
Hi,

i need to sense the line voltage(duh!). My set-up is basically a two
resistor divider across the L & N. The lower resistor is sized such that
I get an approx. 4V peak-peak over it. A difference amplifier is
connected across this resistor with a gain of approx. 1. Theoretically
I'm suppose to get a replica of the mains voltage waveform. But, after
building the circuit the output tends to be almost a square wave. Supply
to the cct is +/-15v. The square wave peaks are hitting the supply rail.
Any ideas how i could remedy this problem?

Sounds like common mode voltage, you need 2 voltage dividers, one for
each input of the op amp. A much better way is to use an ac input opto
coupler.
 
P

Paul Hovnanian P.E.

Jan 1, 1970
0
Mac said:
Can you post a link to a schematic?

Make sure the schematic shows how the power supply to your amplifier is
connected, grounded, etc. with respect to the power line it is
monitoring.
 
L

legg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Sorry, what i meant was i'm suppose to get a scaled down replica of the
mains voltage waveform.

Your diff amp needs common mode rejection for the full amplitude of
the source, and whatever it might be floating on.

To illustrate, the following SWCadIII schematc and waveforms are on
alt.binaries.schematics.electronic.

For galvanic isolation, as mentioned elsewhere, a transformer or
optically isolated method should be considered.

RL

Version 4
SHEET 1 880 680
WIRE -256 176 -256 160
WIRE -256 384 -256 256
WIRE -176 384 -256 384
WIRE -160 160 -256 160
WIRE -160 256 -256 256
WIRE -32 160 -80 160
WIRE -32 160 -32 144
WIRE -32 224 -32 160
WIRE -32 256 -80 256
WIRE -32 320 -32 256
WIRE -16 144 -32 144
WIRE 0 320 -32 320
WIRE 64 224 -32 224
WIRE 64 256 -32 256
WIRE 96 208 96 96
WIRE 96 448 96 272
WIRE 160 320 80 320
WIRE 160 384 -96 384
WIRE 160 384 160 320
WIRE 176 144 64 144
WIRE 176 240 128 240
WIRE 176 240 176 144
WIRE 192 320 160 320
WIRE 192 352 192 320
WIRE 272 240 176 240
WIRE 304 240 272 240
WIRE 304 320 192 320
WIRE 400 96 96 96
WIRE 400 128 400 96
WIRE 400 320 304 320
WIRE 400 320 400 208
WIRE 400 448 96 448
WIRE 400 448 400 400
FLAG 192 352 0
FLAG -32 144 N1
FLAG -32 256 N2
FLAG 272 240 n3
SYMBOL Opamps\\2pole 96 240 R0
SYMATTR InstName U1
SYMBOL res -64 144 R90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 0
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0
SYMATTR InstName R1
SYMATTR Value 1E7
SYMBOL res -64 240 R90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 0
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0
SYMATTR InstName R2
SYMATTR Value 1E7
SYMBOL res 80 128 R90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 0
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0
SYMATTR InstName R3
SYMATTR Value 1E5
SYMBOL res 96 304 R90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 0
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0
SYMATTR InstName R4
SYMATTR Value 1E5
SYMBOL res 320 336 R180
WINDOW 0 36 76 Left 0
WINDOW 3 36 40 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName R5
SYMATTR Value 1E3
SYMBOL voltage 400 112 R0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName V1
SYMATTR Value 12
SYMBOL voltage 400 304 R0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName V2
SYMATTR Value 12
SYMBOL voltage -256 160 R0
WINDOW 3 -84 -60 Left 0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName V3
SYMATTR Value SINE(0 140 60 0 0 0 20)
SYMBOL voltage -80 384 R90
WINDOW 0 -32 56 VBottom 0
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName V4
SYMATTR Value SINE(0 65 85 .1 0 0 30)
TEXT -342 506 Left 0 !.tran 0 .3 .05
 
W

Winfield Hill

Jan 1, 1970
0
[email protected] wrote...
Sounds like common mode voltage, you need 2 voltage dividers, one for
each input of the op amp. A much better way is to use an ac input opto
coupler.

Two dividers, yes, but with their low end tied to the measurement-
circuit ground. Inexorx says he's seeking a replica of the AC line
voltage, and an opto-coupler wouldn't be accurate. Nor do I think
a transformer is necessary, provided certain precautions are taken.
The AC power line can have short spikes to many thousands of volts,
and it's important that the resistive divider circuit handle these
without endangering the equipment or any users. Because the subject
is complex, I'll not take the time to here to explore it, except to
say that even a simple version should have many components.

So a transformer may be the easiest solution. If Inexorx needs an
accurate output, he can lightly load the transformer with an RC to
control high-frequency error and still enjoy a wideband low-voltage
replica of the line voltage. For example, let's consider a Signal
Transformer 241-3-24. This is a small 2.4VA split-bobbin type with
excellent input-output isolation, but with the usual losses that we
see in small, cheap transformers. We can analyze a simple model*
to estimate its errors.

primary L_m, 4.6 H (low-level L-meter)
primary L_m, 11.2 H (meas with 120Vac)
primary Rdc, 372 ohms
secondary L_ell, 25.1 mH
secondary Rdc, 23.8 ohms
open-circuit turns ratio, 0.254

First we'll consider the transformer's primary circuit, where its
roughly 11H of (nonlinear) magnetizing inductance has a reactance
of j4.27k ohms at 60Hz, which with 372 ohms of series resistance
and 120V causes a 28mA magnetizing current at a calculated lag of
-90+5 = -85 degrees to the 120 60Hz ac voltage. The transformer
primary's R-L calculated vector loss is 0.4% at 60Hz, dropping to
0.09% at 120Hz, and less at higher harmonics. The 5-degree phase
lag at 60Hz drops to 2.5 degrees at 120Hz and less above that.

Second, we'll consider the scene at the transformer's secondary.
We can add a 100pF output capacitor, which with the 25mH leakage
inductance will limit the high-frequency response to 100kHz, plus
a 15k load resistor to damp the 100kHz L-C resonance. Multiply the
primary's series copper resistance by 0.254^2 and add this to the
secondary's resistance to get the transformer's Zout = 47.8 ohms.
This means our 15k load will drop the output voltage by about 0.3%,
which is fine given we don't know the turns ratio any better than
than anyway.

Lord Inexorx will end up with an accurate voltage transformer up
to 100kHz, with a small 0.4% drop-off at 60Hz (or an above-200Hz
increase of 0.4%, if he prefers to think of it that way). This
small error could be corrected with a few more parts.

* Data from leakage-inductance threads on s.e.d., January, 1998.
Try these threads, Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
 
K

Ken Smith

Jan 1, 1970
0
Winfield Hill said:
So a transformer may be the easiest solution. If Inexorx needs an
accurate output, he can lightly load the transformer with an RC to
control high-frequency error and still enjoy a wideband low-voltage
replica of the line voltage. For example, let's consider a Signal
Transformer 241-3-24.


Another wat to go is to use a large value resistor to feed current into a
transformer working as a current-xformer. This lets you use a
mechanically smaller transformer at the cost of having to burn off a
little power in the resistor.
 
M

martin griffith

Jan 1, 1970
0
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:55:01 +0000 (UTC), in sci.electronics.design
Another wat to go is to use a large value resistor to feed current into a
transformer working as a current-xformer. This lets you use a
mechanically smaller transformer at the cost of having to burn off a
little power in the resistor.


--
There is an (audio) application showing this on the Lundhal transfomer
site


martin
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"Winfield Hill"
Lord Inexorx will end up with an accurate voltage transformer up
to 100kHz, with a small 0.4% drop-off at 60Hz (or an above-200Hz
increase of 0.4%, if he prefers to think of it that way).


** All is sweetness and light until you factor in the effect of the
"magnetising current " devil.

The I mag waveform is non-sine and hence NOT linearly proportional to input
voltage - its reaches peak value close to each zero crossing causing
significant distortion of the AC supply waveform appearing at the secondary.

With a low VA E-core, as mentioned by Win, this distortion is easily visible
on a scope & amounts to circa 10% 3H.

The Imag current peak also causes a 15 to 20 degree lag in the zero
crossings seen at the secondary - buggers up any zero crossing detector.

Also, the *actual* voltage ratio of the small E-core will vary with AC
supply voltage - by at around 2 or 3% over the whole range.

All these nasties are easily avoided by using a toroidal type where Imag is
Lilliputian.




.......... Phil
 
L

Lord Inexorx

Jan 1, 1970
0
Lord said:
Sorry, what i meant was i'm suppose to get a scaled down replica of the
mains voltage waveform.

Hello All,

Thank you for all the smart replies but i think i have left out
something. I'm trying to do this for a 3-phase supply source. So the
transformer solution though the best but would severely stretch the
budget and the pcb real estate. Thanks all for sharing ur ideas &
knowledge. Appreciate it.
 
L

Lord Inexorx

Jan 1, 1970
0
legg said:
Your diff amp needs common mode rejection for the full amplitude of
the source, and whatever it might be floating on.

To illustrate, the following SWCadIII schematc and waveforms are on
alt.binaries.schematics.electronic.

For galvanic isolation, as mentioned elsewhere, a transformer or
optically isolated method should be considered.

RL

Version 4
SHEET 1 880 680
WIRE -256 176 -256 160
WIRE -256 384 -256 256
WIRE -176 384 -256 384
WIRE -160 160 -256 160
WIRE -160 256 -256 256
WIRE -32 160 -80 160
WIRE -32 160 -32 144
WIRE -32 224 -32 160
WIRE -32 256 -80 256
WIRE -32 320 -32 256
WIRE -16 144 -32 144
WIRE 0 320 -32 320
WIRE 64 224 -32 224
WIRE 64 256 -32 256
WIRE 96 208 96 96
WIRE 96 448 96 272
WIRE 160 320 80 320
WIRE 160 384 -96 384
WIRE 160 384 160 320
WIRE 176 144 64 144
WIRE 176 240 128 240
WIRE 176 240 176 144
WIRE 192 320 160 320
WIRE 192 352 192 320
WIRE 272 240 176 240
WIRE 304 240 272 240
WIRE 304 320 192 320
WIRE 400 96 96 96
WIRE 400 128 400 96
WIRE 400 320 304 320
WIRE 400 320 400 208
WIRE 400 448 96 448
WIRE 400 448 400 400
FLAG 192 352 0
FLAG -32 144 N1
FLAG -32 256 N2
FLAG 272 240 n3
SYMBOL Opamps\\2pole 96 240 R0
SYMATTR InstName U1
SYMBOL res -64 144 R90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 0
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0
SYMATTR InstName R1
SYMATTR Value 1E7
SYMBOL res -64 240 R90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 0
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0
SYMATTR InstName R2
SYMATTR Value 1E7
SYMBOL res 80 128 R90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 0
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0
SYMATTR InstName R3
SYMATTR Value 1E5
SYMBOL res 96 304 R90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 0
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0
SYMATTR InstName R4
SYMATTR Value 1E5
SYMBOL res 320 336 R180
WINDOW 0 36 76 Left 0
WINDOW 3 36 40 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName R5
SYMATTR Value 1E3
SYMBOL voltage 400 112 R0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName V1
SYMATTR Value 12
SYMBOL voltage 400 304 R0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName V2
SYMATTR Value 12
SYMBOL voltage -256 160 R0
WINDOW 3 -84 -60 Left 0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName V3
SYMATTR Value SINE(0 140 60 0 0 0 20)
SYMBOL voltage -80 384 R90
WINDOW 0 -32 56 VBottom 0
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName V4
SYMATTR Value SINE(0 65 85 .1 0 0 30)
TEXT -342 506 Left 0 !.tran 0 .3 .05
Please forgive me for my ignorance but where do i get swcadii or a
viewer for the aforementioned code. I've tried the newsgroup u have
mentioned but the post is a replica of ur previous post here.
 
T

Tony Williams

Jan 1, 1970
0
Lord Inexorx said:
......... So the transformer solution though the best but
would severely stretch the budget and the pcb real estate.

The transformer solution is still the best bet though.
Have a look at using 1:1 (600:600 ohm) telecommunications
transformers, (as used in modems, etc) connected across
the lower-R in your attenuator. Cheap, small, 200Hz to
4KHz, and low THD.

I have used these for low-level 400Hz. The only problem
is that they do have some sensitivity to external magnetic
fields....... lay them out at right-angles to each other,
and fit the whole pcb assembly into a steel box.

A quick, (easy to implement, but more expensive), solution
is 3-off LEM LV 25-P isolated voltage transducers.
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"Tony Williams"
The transformer solution is still the best bet though.
Have a look at using 1:1 (600:600 ohm) telecommunications
transformers,


** Mad idea.

Forget it.

Ordinary AC supply transformers are far cheaper and ACTUALLY intended to
operate at AC line voltage and frequency.





........ Phil
 
Top